🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

California Labor Guidance

Free plain-English summaries of opinion letters, administrative policies, and interpretive notices from California's labor agency, with the current status and the official source on every page.

278 documents · Updated July 6, 2026
278 documents

No California documents match your search

Try different keywords or clear a filter.

Day-of-rest exemption for the "grape industry" during harvest extends to wineries fermenting grapes

A law firm asked DLSE to reconcile the Industrial Welfare Commission's wage orders with Labor Code § 551's day-of-rest requirement, and whether Order 8-80's exemption for the "grape industry" during t…

Opinion Letter May 16, 1988

Time spent changing into required uniforms may be compensable; DLSE adopts the Lindow de minimis test

A hotel chain's counsel argued that time employees spend changing into and out of a required company uniform is de minimis and non-compensable under Lindow v. United States (9th Cir. 1984). DLSE disag…

Opinion Letter May 16, 1988

Payday timing for unscheduled overtime and commissions under semi-monthly pay periods (Labor Code § 204)

A corporate personnel officer asked DLSE to clarify Labor Code § 204's timely-payment rules for wages earned in excess of an employee's normal work period, and for commissions, under a semi-monthly pa…

Opinion Letter May 5, 1988

Auto-repair "commissions" paid per repair are piece-rate wages, not sales commissions, and can't be withheld past the final-pay deadline

A law firm asked whether its client could keep delaying payment of "commissions" to terminated employees until customer offsets and recall reimbursements were resolved. Citing the recent Keyes Motors …

Opinion Letter May 4, 1988

How to calculate overtime owed on commissions earned on top of an hourly wage

A company officer asked DLSE how to calculate overtime for employees who earn commissions in addition to an hourly wage. DLSE explained the basic method: divide the commissions earned in a workweek by…

Opinion Letter March 28, 1988

No cap on daily overtime hours if premium pay is paid; day-of-rest and constructive-discharge limits explained to a state legislator

A member of the California Assembly forwarded a constituent's complaint about excessive required overtime. DLSE responded that no law or regulation caps the amount of daily overtime an employer may re…

Opinion Letter March 21, 1988

Overtime for substitute employees who fill in on a different shift length under an alternative-workweek agreement (Wage Order 5-80)

A law firm asked DLSE how overtime applies to substitute employees who work rotating 8-hour and 12-hour shifts under the alternative-workweek amendments to Wage Order 5-80. DLSE distinguished three si…

Opinion Letter March 21, 1988

Meal periods spent confined to the employer's premises count as hours worked

An attorney asked DLSE to explain its position under Section 11 of the Industrial Welfare Commission orders on employees required to remain on the employer's premises during meal periods. DLSE reaffir…

Opinion Letter January 5, 1988

Pre-existing, firm-wide sabbatical programs get a narrow exception from Suastez

An attorney followed up on DLSE's July 13, 1987 letter (1987.07.13-1) to ask about a sabbatical leave program offered to all employees of a firm, not just senior managers. DLSE reaffirmed that a firm-…

Opinion Letter October 6, 1987

Federal Service Contract Act vacation rules are a floor, not a ceiling, under California law

The U.S. Department of Energy's Assistant Chief Counsel asked DLSE about vacation-benefit obligations for federal Service Contract Act contractors operating in California. DLSE's Chief Counsel respond…

Opinion Letter September 8, 1987

No California exemption from daily overtime for federal Service Contract Act employees

A federal contractor's human resources manager asked whether California exempts employees working under the federal Service Contract Act and Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act from the Indus…

Opinion Letter August 27, 1987

Criteria for a sabbatical leave program to fall outside Suastez and Section 227.3

An attorney asked DLSE whether Labor Code Section 227.3 and the Suastez decision apply to a client's sabbatical leave program. DLSE opined that a true sabbatical, defined as paid leave for travel, res…

Opinion Letter July 13, 1987

Longevity bonuses in lieu of vacation at temporary service agencies, evaluated case-by-case for Suastez subterfuge

A temporary staffing company's president asked DLSE how the Suastez decision applies to temporary service agencies that pay longevity bonuses instead of offering vacation. DLSE explained that because …

Opinion Letter July 13, 1987

Repayable quarterly 'yearly' bonus for nurses raises substantial-performance and deduction problems

An attorney asked DLSE about a bonus plan for nurses that pays a yearly bonus in quarterly installments, with repayment required if the employee does not complete a full year. DLSE said paying the bon…

Opinion Letter July 1, 1987

Federal Service Contract Act vacation rules do not preempt California's Suastez proration requirement

An attorney for a security-guard contractor at the Oakland Army Base asked whether the federal Service Contract Act's vacation rules, which do not require proration, override California's Suastez v. P…

Opinion Letter June 13, 1987

Bonus plans conditioned on active employment: substantial performance decided case-by-case

A law firm asked DLSE two questions about employee bonus plans: (1) whether a plan may require active employment on the bonus payment date, and (2) how the reason for termination affects eligibility. …

Opinion Letter June 3, 1987

Suastez does not apply where no paid vacation is offered at all

An attorney asked DLSE whether the Suastez decision applied to a client whose sales representatives received no paid vacation but could take unpaid time off by mutual agreement, continuing to earn com…

Opinion Letter May 14, 1987

'Unlimited' executive vacation with approval still vests pro rata under Suastez

An attorney asked DLSE to review a client's executive vacation and sick-leave policy, arguing that no vacation was accruing because managers were told they had unlimited vacation "with approval." DLSE…

Opinion Letter May 11, 1987

Decelerating vacation accrual and probationary forfeitures violate Suastez

A trade association's executive asked DLSE to review specific vacation-accrual mechanics against the Suastez decision and Interpretive Bulletin 86-3. DLSE found that disproportionate, decelerating acc…

Opinion Letter March 16, 1987

Sick leave convertible to 'personal compelling business' time is treated as vacation

A bank's personnel assistant asked DLSE about a policy letting employees use 3 days (24 hours) of earned sick leave for "personal compelling business" once 80 hours of sick leave had accrued. DLSE con…

Opinion Letter March 11, 1987

Minimum wage as a draw against commissions, and reconciliation timing

An individual asked DLSE about paying minimum wage combined with commissions. DLSE explained that an employee covered by an Industrial Welfare Commission order must be paid at least minimum wage for e…

Opinion Letter March 3, 1987

Prizes count toward overtime pay only if regular and tied to job performance

A law firm asked DLSE whether the value of prizes given to employees (nominal lottery tickets and raffle prizes) must be factored into the regular rate used to calculate overtime pay. DLSE responded t…

Opinion Letter February 17, 1987

Personal Days Off convertible to vacation are subject to the Suastez no-forfeiture rule

A company's staff attorney asked DLSE to review its Personal Days Off (PDO) policy against the California Supreme Court's Suastez v. Plastic Dress-Up decision and DLSE's Interpretive Bulletin 86-3. Be…

Opinion Letter January 14, 1987

Electronic payroll deposit requires voluntary employee authorization

An employer's personnel director asked whether the company could establish an automatic electronic payroll deposit system. DLSE confirmed that Labor Code Section 213 permits automatic deposit into an …

Opinion Letter January 7, 1987

A vacation accrual rate that decelerates mid-employment is a Suastez red flag, with a narrow pre-existing-policy exception

An attorney asked DLSE to review a client's vacation policy where the accrual rate accelerated in the second six months of employment, then decelerated and leveled off, under the Suastez decision. DLS…

Opinion Letter December 30, 1986

Cafeteria-style benefit plans under IRC Section 125 do not excuse compliance with Suastez

A bank's general counsel asked DLSE how Interpretive Bulletin 86-3 (applying the Suastez decision) interacts with IRS regulations under Internal Revenue Code Section 125 governing cafeteria-style bene…

Opinion Letter December 24, 1986

Quarterly incentive bonus payments must still meet Labor Code Section 204's payday timing

An attorney asked DLSE to review a client's "Quality Incentive Bonus Plan" against Labor Code Sections 204 (payday timing) and 210 (penalties for late wages). DLSE confirmed that paying the bonus quar…

Opinion Letter December 23, 1986

Traditional sabbatical leave generally falls outside Suastez, decided case-by-case

A company president asked DLSE how the Suastez decision and Interpretive Bulletin 86-3 apply to sabbatical leave. DLSE explained that sabbatical leave is generally not covered by Suastez, assuming it …

Opinion Letter December 13, 1986

Workweek overtime and split-shift premium explained for an irregular retail schedule

A retail employer's assistant employee relations manager asked DLSE about overtime owed under a specific weekly work schedule. DLSE explained that IWC Order 7-80 requires overtime after 8 hours in a d…

Opinion Letter December 1, 1986

Computing pro rata vacation pay for salespeople on a draw plus commissions

A trade association's executive director asked DLSE how vacation pay should be computed for salespeople paid a draw plus commissions, following the Suastez decision. DLSE explained that Suastez lets e…

Opinion Letter November 17, 1986

Flexible time off (FTO) that mixes vacation, sick leave, and personal time is subject to Suastez

A manufacturers' association's general counsel asked DLSE to review a member employer's flexible time off (FTO) policy against the Suastez decision. DLSE concluded FTO usable at the employee's discret…

Opinion Letter November 4, 1986

Floating holidays and general absence time count as vacation; deducting advanced vacation at termination

A law firm asked DLSE several questions under Interpretive Bulletin 86-3. DLSE stated that floating holidays and general absences count as vacation time under Suastez. Vacation time advanced before it…

Opinion Letter October 28, 1986

A quitting employee generally must return to the workplace to collect final wages under Section 208

A retailer asked DLSE to issue an Interpretive Bulletin clarifying Labor Code Section 208's requirement that wages of a discharged employee be paid at the place of discharge, and that a quitting emplo…

Opinion Letter September 15, 1986

IWC uniform-maintenance requirements are not preempted by the NLRA, even under a collective bargaining agreement

A defense contractor's senior counsel argued that the Industrial Welfare Commission Orders' requirement that an employer maintain uniforms it requires interferes with collective bargaining and is pree…

Opinion Letter July 31, 1986

Car allowance is a business expense, not vacation pay, absent a specific agreement

A personnel coordinator asked DLSE whether a car allowance must be included when calculating accrued vacation pay owed to terminated employees. DLSE responded that, absent a specific agreement includi…

Opinion Letter May 20, 1986

The ten-minute rest period must be 'net' of travel time, including in the cotton gin industry

A trade association executive raised a dispute with DLSE staff over the meaning of "net" rest time under Industrial Welfare Commission Order 8-80, Section 12, for the cotton gin industry. DLSE explain…

Opinion Letter January 3, 1986

California IWC Orders apply to a business on federal National Forest land

A resort marina's regional accounting manager asked DLSE whether the business must comply with the California Industrial Welfare Commission Orders given its location on federal National Forest land. D…

Opinion Letter February 14, 1985

Mechanics paid a 'flat rate hour' are not exempt from overtime as commissioned salespeople

An attorney asked DLSE to reconsider its position on overtime for auto mechanics paid on a "flat rate hour" basis, citing a municipal court decision that treated such mechanics as paid on commission a…

Opinion Letter November 25, 1983

Browse California guidance by topic

These are official interpretive documents from California's labor agency: opinion letters answering questions from employers and workers, administrative policies, and interpretive notices. They show how the agency applies wage-and-hour and workplace law to real situations, but they are guidance, not statutes or court decisions, and the agency can supersede or withdraw them. Every page above shows the document's current status, when that status was last verified, and a link to the official source.

Labor guidance in other states