🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
CA Opinion Letter 1988.05.05 May 5, 1988 Active
Back to California guidance

Payday timing for unscheduled overtime and commissions under semi-monthly pay periods (Labor Code § 204)

Summary: A corporate personnel officer asked DLSE to clarify Labor Code § 204's timely-payment rules for wages earned in excess of an employee's normal work period, and for commissions, under a semi-monthly pay schedule. DLSE explained that unscheduled overtime beyond an employee's normal hours may be paid on the next regular payday rather than immediately, that a semi-monthly schedule complies with § 204 only if wages earned the 1st-15th are paid by the 26th (applying equally to part-time workers), and that commissions must be paid by the 26th or 10th of the next month depending on when in the pay period they became payable. DLSE also noted it allows employers reasonable time to fix noncompliant payroll practices, but not an open-ended delay.

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ezel answers your specific situation, under current California labor law, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

STATI OF CALIFORNIA GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor

DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS

DIVISION OF LABOR STANDARDS ENFORCEMENT
525 GOLDEN GATE AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO. CA 94102
ADDRESS REPLY TO:
P.O. BOX 603
San Francisco CA 94102

                                                                       IN REPLY REFER TO:

May 5, 1988

Ms. Maureen Haggarty
Vice President - Personnel
GMAC Mortgage Corporation
8360 Old York Road
Elkins Park, PA 19117-1590

Dear Ms. Haggarty:

This is in reply to your letter of April 18, 1988 regarding the timely payment of wages under California law. The answers to your specific questions are as follows:

  1. Wages "earned in excess of the normal work period" would cover work that is not normally scheduled i.e., usually unscheduled overtime. Some employers may schedule regular overtime for extensive periods during peak operations; such overtime would not fall under the intent of the statute and must be paid on the designated payday.

Any hours worked beyond an employee's normal work period may be considered in "excess of the normal work period," although such work is not at premium rates, these wages may be paid at the next regular payday. An example would be a part-time worker who normally works 4 hours per day is required to work 6 hours per day due to unanticipated work loads, the 2 hours may be paid on the next payday.

In your example, the 5 hours may be paid on the next regular payday after the pay period in which the extra work was performed.

  1. A semi-monthly pay period is considered a "regular pay period" if the employer normally pays wages on a semi-monthly basis as permitted by Section 204 of the Labor Code. Unscheduled work in excess of the normal work schedule during a semi-monthly pay period may be paid on the next payday.

  2. Semi-monthly pay periods are in compliance with Section 204, provided wages earned from the 1st to the 15th of the month are paid by the 26th of the same month. This requirement includes part-time workers. The payday must be designated in advance.

Commissioned employees must be paid their commissions within the framework of Section 204 when the commissions become payable. If in your example commissions are earned at the close of a loan, such commission must be paid by the 26th of the month if the loan closes during the period between the 1st to the 15th of the month. Commissions on closings after the 15th are payable by the 10th of the following month.

hhf
DLSE 905

1988.05.05


Page 2

Ms. Maureen Haggarty
May 5, 1988
Page Two

It is the Division policy to give employers reasonable time to adjust payroll practices to conform to the Labor Code mandates, however, taking until January 1, 1989 would be considered an excessive period of time. For your guidance enclosed is a digest of California's wage payment laws.

I hope this answers your questions; if not, please let me know.

Very truly yours,

Lloyd W. Aubry, Jr.
State Labor Commissioner

LWA/st

Get the answer for your situation

You just read California's guidance on this. Ezel checks current California labor law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.