🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
CA Opinion Letter 1986.11.17 November 17, 1986 Active
Back to California guidance

Computing pro rata vacation pay for salespeople on a draw plus commissions

Summary: A trade association's executive director asked DLSE how vacation pay should be computed for salespeople paid a draw plus commissions, following the Suastez decision. DLSE explained that Suastez lets employers set the amount of vacation and how it is calculated for commissioned employees, including limiting vacation pay to just the draw or various draw-plus-commission-percentage combinations, and that any commissions that become due during a vacation are owed regardless of vacation policy. On termination, DLSE pro-rates whatever the employer's specific vacation policy provides.

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ezel answers your specific situation, under current California labor law, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN Governor
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS

DIVISION OF LABOR STANDARDS ENFORCEMENT
525 GOLDEN GATE AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA

       (415)      557-3827                                ADDRESS REPLY TO:
                                                            PO BOX 603
                                                            San Francisco, CA 94101

                                 November 17, 1986        IN REPLY REFER TO:

Mr. Vic Biondi
Executive Director
California Broadcasters Association
1127 - 11th Street, Suite 720
Sacramento, CA 95814

Dear Mr. Biondi:

Thank you for your letter of October 21, 1986, regarding payment of vacation pay to employees on a draw plus commissions under the recent Suastez decision.

The Labor Code and the Suastez decision permit employers to establish the amount of vacation and control the time when vacation may be taken. In determining the amount of vacation in the context of a commissioned employee, the employer may limit the vacation pay to the amount of the draw, or various combinations of draw plus percentages of commissions.

In most instances, when a salesperson is on a draw plus commission, that person receives the draw during the vacation period and any previously earned commissions that become due during the vacation period. This arrangement may lead to a dip in the earnings a few weeks later as the salesperson does not generate any new commissions during the vacation period. Salespersons usually realize that when they are on vacation, they cannot service their accounts and must rely on backup assistance or repeat orders during their vacation.

It is very rare that an employer would average out commissions for the period prior to the vacation and pay this amount during the vacation period. However, as the Suastez decision permits employers to set the amount of vacation, there could be numerous combinations of draws and commissions available as a basis for setting a vacation policy.

To answer your specific question regarding how the Division would compute pro rata vacation, the Division would look to the basic vacation policy or agreement and require the employer to pro-rate on that basis. For example, if the policy is to pay


Page 2

only a draw during the vacation period, the pro rata share of the draw would be required to be paid. It should be noted that the employee, under the basic wage laws, would be entitled to any commissions that become due and payable during the vacation period regardless of the Suastez decision and/or the employer's vacation policy.

I would suggest that you advise the employers to review their vacation policies covering salespersons to make sure that in cases of a determination that the agreement is specific as to how the amount of vacation is computed (consistent, of course, with the principles of Suastez). If terminated, the employee will be entitled to a pro rata share of that amount.

I hope this answers your questions. If not, please let me know.

Very truly yours,

Lloyd W. Aubry, Jr.
State Labor Commissioner

LWA: ba

1986.11.17

Get the answer for your situation

You just read California's guidance on this. Ezel checks current California labor law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.