South Carolina: Voting Leave Requirements
The short answer
South Carolina has no general private-employer statute requiring time off or pay for an employee to vote. The election code instead criminalizes using threats or intimidation to procure another person's vote for or against a candidate and, at an election, threatening, mistreating, or abusing a voter to control or intimidate the exercise of suffrage. Those crimes do not create a leave duration, pay rule, request deadline, employer scheduling right, or posting duty.
Ask Ezel about your situation
This is the general rule in South Carolina. Ezel applies current South Carolina law to your specific facts and answers with citations to the statutes.
| Governing law | No general private-employer voting-leave statute located; related voter-protection crimes are S.C. Code §§ 7-25-70, 7-25-80 |
|---|---|
| Eligible workers and elections | No statutory employee-leave eligibility; §§ 7-25-70 and 7-25-80 instead protect voters against candidate-directed threats and election-site intimidation |
| Outside-work-hours test | None; South Carolina states no general private-employer voting-leave entitlement |
| Time-off amount | None required by the located statutes |
| Paid or unpaid | No mandatory voting-leave pay under the located statutes |
| When leave is taken | No statutory voting-leave window or scheduling rule |
| Employee notice and employer posting | No voting-leave request deadline, required form, or employer-posting duty stated |
| Protection and penalties | No employment-specific leave protection; procuring a candidate vote by threat or intimidation is a misdemeanor carrying a $100-$500 fine, up to 3 years' imprisonment, or both (§ 7-25-70), while election-site threats, mistreatment, or abuse intended to control or intimidate suffrage are a felony carrying a discretionary fine, up to 10 years, or both (§ 7-25-80) |
Compare this rule across all 50 states + DC →
No private-sector time-off mandate
The located current South Carolina statutes do not require an ordinary private
employer to release an employee from a scheduled shift to vote. They state no
leave duration, paid-time rule, outside-work-hours test, employee request
procedure, employer scheduling authority, or voting-leave posting duty.
South Carolina's election code addresses coercion instead. Section 7-25-70
makes it a misdemeanor to use threats or another form of intimidation to
procure, offer, or promise to endeavor to procure another person's vote for or
against a candidate. The punishment is a $100 to $500 fine, imprisonment for
up to three years, or both.
Section 7-25-80 reaches conduct at a general, special, or primary election. A
person who threatens, mistreats, or abuses a voter to control or intimidate the
free exercise of suffrage commits a felony punishable by a discretionary fine,
up to ten years' imprisonment, or both.
What trips people up
Criminal voter-protection statutes are not voting-leave statutes. Sections
7-25-70 and 7-25-80 may prohibit coercive conduct about a person's vote, but
neither requires an employer to interrupt a work shift, continue wages during
an absence, or accept a leave request.
The practical ability to vote early also does not itself create workplace
leave. Whether an employer voluntarily allows paid or unpaid time remains a
matter of employer policy or agreement rather than a general state mandate.
Common questions
Does South Carolina require two paid hours to vote?
No. The located current statutes state no private-sector voting-leave duration
or pay requirement.
Is threatening someone to control a vote a crime?
Yes. The applicable classification and punishment depend on whether the
conduct falls under § 7-25-70 or the election-site offense in § 7-25-80.
Must an employee give advance notice?
No statutory notice deadline or form exists because South Carolina has no
general private-employer voting-leave entitlement.
Statutes and sources
- S.C. Code § 7-25-70: threats or intimidation to procure a vote for or against
a candidate — official text
(accessed July 13, 2026). - S.C. Code § 7-25-80: threats, mistreatment, or abuse at an election intended
to control or intimidate suffrage — official text
(accessed July 13, 2026).
Source links
Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.
Get the answer for your situation
You just read how South Carolina handles this in general. Ezel applies current South Carolina law to your facts and answers your specific question, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.