Oregon: Voting Leave Requirements
The short answer
Oregon has no general private-employer statute requiring time off or pay for an employee to vote. Its election code instead prohibits using undue influence—including actual or threatened loss of employment—to induce a person to vote, refrain from voting, or vote in a particular manner. That protection does not create a leave duration, pay rule, request deadline, scheduling right, or posting duty. A violation without another specified civil penalty may draw up to $1,000 per violation.
Ask Ezel about your situation
This is the general rule in Oregon. Ezel applies current Oregon law to your specific facts and answers with citations to the statutes.
| Governing law | No general private-employer voting-leave statute located; related protections are Or. Rev. Stat. §§ 260.665, 260.995 |
|---|---|
| Eligible workers and elections | No statutory employee-leave eligibility; § 260.665 protects any person against undue influence intended to induce voting, nonvoting, or voting in a particular manner |
| Outside-work-hours test | None; Oregon states no general private-employer voting-leave entitlement |
| Time-off amount | None required by the located statutes |
| Paid or unpaid | No mandatory voting-leave pay under the located statutes |
| When leave is taken | No statutory voting-leave window or scheduling rule |
| Employee notice and employer posting | No voting-leave request deadline, required form, or private-employer posting duty stated |
| Protection and penalties | Actual or threatened loss of employment is 'undue influence' and may not be used to induce voting, nonvoting, or a particular vote (§ 260.665(1)-(2)); where no other civil penalty applies, the Secretary of State or Attorney General may impose up to $1,000 per violation (§ 260.995(1)) |
Compare this rule across all 50 states + DC →
No private-sector time-off mandate
The located current Oregon statutes do not require an ordinary private employer
to release an employee from a scheduled shift to vote. They state no leave
duration, wage-continuation rule, outside-work-hours test, employee request
procedure, employer scheduling authority, or voting-leave posting duty.
Oregon instead protects voting choices from undue influence. Section
260.665(1) defines that term to include actual or threatened loss of
employment, along with force, violence, restraint, injury, damage, harm, other
loss, and specified offers of value.
Under § 260.665(2), a person may not use that undue influence to induce someone
to register or vote, refrain from registering or voting, or register or vote
in a particular manner. The prohibition is not limited to employers, but its
express reference to loss of employment reaches job-based threats.
Section 260.995(1) authorizes the Secretary of State or Attorney General,
following an investigation, to impose a civil penalty up to $1,000 for an
election-law violation when another civil penalty is not provided.
What trips people up
Protection from a threatened job loss over how or whether someone votes is not
a right to interrupt work. Section 260.665 does not require leave and does not
say an employer must pay for time away.
Oregon conducts elections primarily by mail, but the voting method does not
itself create an employment scheduling duty. Voluntary time off remains a
matter of employer policy or agreement.
Common questions
Does Oregon require paid time off to vote?
No. The located current statutes state no private-sector voting-leave or pay
requirement.
May an employer threaten job loss to control a vote?
No. Loss of employment or its threat is expressly included in “undue
influence” under § 260.665.
Must an employee give advance notice?
No statutory notice deadline exists because Oregon has no general
private-employer voting-leave entitlement.
Statutes and sources
- Or. Rev. Stat. § 260.665(1)-(2): undue influence, including job-loss threats,
used to affect voting — official text
(accessed July 13, 2026). - Or. Rev. Stat. § 260.995(1): general civil penalty up to $1,000 — official
text
(accessed July 13, 2026).
Source links
Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.
Get the answer for your situation
You just read how Oregon handles this in general. Ezel applies current Oregon law to your facts and answers your specific question, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.