Arizona: Pay Stub Requirements
The short answer
Arizona's general wage-payment statute requires a statement only when wages are paid by deposit to a financial institution or to a payroll card account; it does not state the same duty for cash or check payment. For either covered electronic-payment method, the employer must furnish a written or electronic statement of earnings and withholdings when the wages are paid. A violation of the section is a petty offense, while the statute's treble-damages remedy requires unpaid wages rather than a statement-only error.
Ask Ezel about your situation
This is the general rule in Arizona. Ezel applies current Arizona law to your specific facts and answers with citations to the statutes.
| Governing law and coverage | A.R.S. §§ 23-350, 23-351(E)-(F). Employers and employees under Article 7, but statement duty is limited to wages paid by financial-institution deposit or payroll card; no parallel cash/check statement rule stated |
|---|---|
| Must provide a statement and when | When wages are paid by financial-institution deposit or payroll card, furnish statement of earnings/withholdings. No general every-payment statement for cash, check, or public warrant stated (§ 23-351(D)-(F)) |
| Pay period, employer, and employee identification | No pay-period dates, payday, employer/employee name or address, employee number, or SSN field stated (§ 23-351(E)-(F)) |
| Gross earnings, hours, rates, and pay basis | Statement of employee's earnings; no separate gross-pay, hours, regular/overtime rate, piece-unit, commission, salary, shift, or assignment field stated (§ 23-351(E)-(F)) |
| Deductions, net pay, allowances, and other required items | Statement of withholdings; no itemization/purpose, net-pay, allowance, tip, leave-balance, or employer-contribution field stated (§ 23-351(E)-(F)) |
| Electronic delivery, consent, printing, and storage | Written or electronic statement expressly allowed for both covered payment methods; no separate statement consent, paper opt-out, printing, downloading, saving, or portal-duration condition stated (§ 23-351(E)-(F)) |
| Employee copy access and employer retention | § 23-351 states no stub-retention or historical-copy procedure. Separately, minimum-wage-law employers keep payroll records 4 years and let employee/designee inspect and copy their payroll records (§ 23-364(D)) |
| Enforcement, damages, penalties, and deadlines | Any § 23-351 violation is a petty offense (§ 23-351(I)). Treble damages require unpaid wages (§ 23-355), not a statement-only violation. Separate minimum-wage recordkeeping/access violations: at least $250 first, at least $1,000 subsequent/willful (§ 23-364(F)) |
Compare this rule across all 50 states + DC →
Requirements one by one
The statement duty turns on payment method
A.R.S. § 23-351(D) lists cash, check, public warrant, deposit to a financial
institution, and payroll card as payment methods. Subsections (E) and (F) attach
the earnings-and-withholdings statement only to financial-institution deposits
and payroll card accounts.
The Article 7 definitions in § 23-350(2)-(3) cover a person performing services
under an Arizona-connected employment contract and the employing private or
public entity.
The statute does not repeat that statement duty for cash, negotiable check, or
public warrant payment. Arizona therefore is not an unconditional every-payment
pay-stub state under this general provision.
The content list is compact
For either covered electronic-payment method, including the payroll-card rule in
§ 23-351(F), the employee receives a statement
of “earnings and withholdings.” The text does not separately name pay-period
dates, payday, party identifiers, gross or net pay, hours, rates, pay basis,
deduction itemization or purpose, leave balance, tips, allowances, or employer
contributions.
That does not mean an employer may calculate earnings or withholdings
incorrectly. It means the employee-facing field list in § 23-351(E)-(F) is not
more specific than those two categories.
Written and electronic statements are both express options
Both subsection (E) and subsection (F) say “written or electronic statement.”
The statement provision itself states no separate consent, paper opt-out,
printing, downloading, saving, or portal-access-duration condition.
Consent to direct deposit is a different issue under subsection (D). It should
not be converted into a separate consent requirement for the statement format.
General wage law and minimum-wage records use different scopes
Section 23-351 states no retention period or former-employee copy procedure for
the earnings-and-withholdings statement. Arizona's separate minimum-wage law
requires employers within that article to keep payroll records for four years
and permit the employee or designated representative to inspect and copy the
employee's payroll records.
That separate access rule should be reported with its minimum-wage-law scope,
not treated as proof that § 23-351 itself promises old pay-stub copies to every
employee covered by Article 7.
A statement violation is a petty offense
A.R.S. § 23-351(I) makes any employer violation of the section a petty offense.
The private treble-damages provision in § 23-355(A) requires a failure to pay
wages due, so it does not create treble damages for a statement-only omission
when the wages were fully paid.
Within the separate minimum-wage article, a recordkeeping or access violation
can carry a civil penalty of at least $250 for a first violation and at least
$1,000 for a subsequent or willful violation under § 23-364(F).
What trips people up
Direct deposit and payroll cards have the same statement rule, but they do not
have the same payment-consent structure. The statement can be written or
electronic in either case.
“Earnings and withholdings” is the entire express employee-facing content rule.
Do not silently import detailed federal payroll-record fields into the Arizona
statement.
The four-year access rule comes from the minimum-wage article. It is not a
universal historical-stub rule written into § 23-351.
Common questions
Does a cash-paid employee have a general Arizona pay-stub right?
Section 23-351 lists cash as a lawful payment method but attaches its statement
duty only to financial-institution deposits and payroll-card payments.
Must the statement be paper?
No. The statute expressly allows a written or electronic statement.
Does a missing statement automatically produce triple damages?
No. Section 23-355's treble recovery requires unpaid wages. Section 23-351 makes
its own violation a petty offense.
Statutes and sources
- A.R.S. §§ 23-350, 23-351(D)-(I). Coverage, payment-method limitation,
statement content and format, and petty-offense liability. Official
text (accessed July 13, 2026). - A.R.S. § 23-355(A). Unpaid-wage condition for treble damages. Official
text (accessed July 13, 2026). - A.R.S. § 23-364(D), (F). Minimum-wage-law four-year payroll records,
employee inspection/copying, and recordkeeping penalties. Official
text (accessed July 13, 2026).
Source links
Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.
Get the answer for your situation
You just read how Arizona handles this in general. Ezel applies current Arizona law to your facts and answers your specific question, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.