Michigan: Employee Personnel File Access Requirements
The short answer
Michigan gives current and former employees of an employer with at least four employees a written-request right to review personnel records used for employment decisions. Review is offered at reasonable intervals—generally no more than twice per year—but the Act sets no fixed response-day count. After review, the employee may obtain copies at actual incremental cost, submit a written rebuttal, and sue to compel compliance.
Ask Ezel about your situation
This is the general rule in Michigan. Ezel applies current Michigan law to your specific facts and answers with citations to the statutes.
| Governing law | Bullard-Plawecki Employee Right to Know Act, Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 423.501-.511 |
|---|---|
| Who may request the file | Current or former employee; employer must have ≥4 employees. No former-worker cutoff or general representative right stated (§ 423.501) |
| Records covered | Records used or potentially affecting employment, promotion, transfer, added compensation, or discipline, including contracted recordkeepers (§ 423.501) |
| Excluded or redacted records | References, multiemployee planning, separately available medical records, third-party private data, separate investigations, education records, unshared maker notes (§ 423.501) |
| How to request and verify authority | Written request describing the personnel record; no notarization, certified mail, employer form, or general ID-copy requirement (§ 423.503) |
| Response deadline and inspection location | No fixed day count—reasonable intervals, generally ≤2/year, near workplace during office hours; alternate reasonable time if work leave otherwise needed (§ 423.503) |
| Copy, mailing, and cost rights | After review, all/part copies at actual incremental duplication cost; mail required on written request if employee cannot review at employing unit (§ 423.504) |
| Correction or employee rebuttal | Mutual correction/removal; unresolved statement up to 5 letter-size sheets travels with disclosure; knowingly false material may be judicially expunged (§ 423.505) |
| Former-worker limits and enforcement | Former employees covered without stated cutoff; generally ≤2 reviews/year. Court compliance action; actual damages/costs, plus $200 and fees for willful knowing violation (§§ 423.501, .503, .511) |
Compare this rule across all 50 states + DC →
Requirements one by one
Who may review and what is covered
Section 423.501 covers both current and former employees and gives no post-
termination cutoff. The employer must have at least four employees. The record
is defined by use: material that identifies the employee and is used, has been
used, or may affect employment, promotion, transfer, additional compensation,
or discipline. A contracted outside recordkeeper does not take the record out
of the Act.
The exclusions include identifying references, multiemployee staff planning,
medical material available from the provider, third-party private information,
separately kept criminal and grievance investigations, student education
records, and genuinely private maker notes that are not shared.
Written request, review, and copies
The employee submits a written request describing the personnel record. The Act
does not set a numeric response deadline. It requires review at reasonable
intervals, generally no more than twice per calendar year, at a location near
the workplace during normal office hours. If that timing would require leave
from work, the employer must offer another reasonable time.
After review, the employee may obtain all or part of the information. The fee is
limited to actual incremental duplication cost. If the employee demonstrates an
inability to review at the employing unit, § 423.504 requires mailing on written
request.
Correction, rebuttal, and court relief
The parties may agree to remove or correct disputed information. If they do not,
the employee may submit a statement of no more than five letter-size sheets. It
must accompany the disputed information whenever that information is disclosed
to a third party while it remains in the file.
An employee may sue in circuit court to compel compliance. A prevailing employee
receives actual damages and costs; a willful and knowing violation adds $200 and
reasonable attorney fees.
What trips people up
The twice-yearly language is a general frequency rule, not a fixed response
deadline. A request still must be handled at reasonable intervals, but the Act
does not translate that standard into a set number of days.
The ordinary copy right follows review. Mailing is narrower still: the employee
must demonstrate an inability to review at the employing unit and make a written
request. The statute does not create a general right to demand mail delivery in
every case.
Former employees remain within the definition without a stated one-year or
three-year window. That does not create a separate retention period; access can
only reach records the employer still has.
Common questions
Can a former employee make a request?
Yes. Section 423.501 defines employee to include a person formerly employed and
states no post-termination cutoff.
Can the employer charge for copies?
Yes, but only the actual incremental cost of duplicating the requested
information.
Can I force the employer to delete an evaluation I dispute?
Correction or removal requires agreement unless the information was knowingly
false and legal action supports expungement. Otherwise, the employee can add the
statutory written statement.
Statutes and sources
- Mich. Comp. Laws § 423.501: covered employees and employers, functional record
definition, and exclusions — official text
(accessed July 12, 2026). - Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 423.503-.504: written request, reasonable-interval review,
location, copies, fee, and mailing — review
and copies
(accessed July 12, 2026). - Mich. Comp. Laws § 423.505: correction, employee statement, and expungement —
official text
(accessed July 12, 2026). - Mich. Comp. Laws § 423.511: compliance action, damages, costs, and attorney
fees — official text
(accessed July 12, 2026).
Source links
Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.
Get the answer for your situation
You just read how Michigan handles this in general. Ezel applies current Michigan law to your facts and answers your specific question, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.