South Dakota: Employee Expense Reimbursement Requirements
The short answer
Yes. SDCL § 60-2-1 requires an employer to indemnify an employee for necessary expenditures or losses directly caused by the employee's duties or obedience to employer directions. Ordinary business risks and specified coworker-negligence losses are excluded, while employer-carelessness losses are always covered.
Ask Ezel about your situation
This is the general rule in South Dakota. Ezel applies current South Dakota law to your specific facts and answers with citations to the statutes.
| Governing law and coverage | SDCL §§ 60-2-1 to 60-2-3; general employer-to-employee indemnity duty, plus a specific required-medical-exam cost rule in § 60-11-2 |
|---|---|
| Reimbursable expense standard | All the employee necessarily expends or loses in direct consequence of duties or obedience to employer direction (§ 60-2-1) |
| Authorization, direction, and primary benefit | Discharge of employee duties or obedience to employer direction; no separate preapproval, ratification, or primary-benefit test stated (§ 60-2-1) |
| Excluded losses and employee fault | Ordinary business risks and specified coworker-negligence losses excluded; known-unlawful directions excluded; employer-carelessness losses covered (§§ 60-2-1 to -3) |
| Request deadline and documentation | No submission deadline, receipt, itemization, certification, or missing-document procedure stated (§§ 60-2-1 to -3) |
| Employer policy, preapproval, and caps | No express policy, preapproval, specification, cap, de minimis, deadline-extension, or waiver rule stated (§§ 60-2-1 to -3) |
| Payment deadline, method, and interest | No fixed payment deadline, clock trigger, method, advance, stipend, or interest rule stated (§§ 60-2-1 to -3) |
| Enforcement and remedies | Sections create the indemnity duty without a specific agency, damages, fee, interest, or limitations formula; required-exam cost shifting is a Class 2 misdemeanor (§ 60-11-2) |
Compare this rule across all 50 states + DC →
Requirements one by one
Necessary costs and losses tied directly to the work are covered
SDCL § 60-2-1 requires an employer to indemnify an employee for everything the
employee “necessarily expends or loses” in direct consequence of the employee's
duties or obedience to the employer's direction.
The direction may be unlawful, but the protection does not extend to an
employee who believed the direction was unlawful when obeying it. The section
does not add a separate advance-approval or primary-benefit test.
Ordinary risks and specified coworker losses are excluded
Under § 60-2-2, an employer generally need not indemnify losses caused by the
ordinary risks of the business. The section also excludes losses caused by a
coworker's negligence in the same general business unless the employer failed
to use ordinary care in selecting the culpable employee.
By contrast, § 60-2-3 says the employer must “in all cases” indemnify losses
caused by the employer's want of ordinary care.
The statutes supply no claim or payment procedure
Sections 60-2-1 to 60-2-3 state no employee submission deadline, receipt form,
itemization requirement, missing-document substitute, employer-policy rule,
reimbursement cap, payment clock, payment method, interest provision, agency
claim, statutory damages amount, attorney-fee rule, or limitations formula.
South Dakota separately makes it a Class 2 misdemeanor under § 60-11-2 to
require an employee to pay for a medical examination or records required as a
condition of continued employment.
What trips people up
The indemnity duty is broader than the medical-examination rule. It reaches
necessary expenditures and losses directly caused by duties or employer
direction, subject to the exclusions in § 60-2-2.
The statute does not set a category-specific mileage rate, phone percentage,
travel allowance, or home-office amount. Its text supplies a necessary-cost and
direct-consequence standard instead.
Common questions
Does South Dakota require advance approval?
Section 60-2-1 states no separate advance-approval requirement. It asks whether
the necessary expense or loss directly resulted from duties or obedience to the
employer's direction.
Is there a statutory deadline for submitting receipts?
Not in §§ 60-2-1 to 60-2-3. Those sections state no submission period or
required receipt format.
Are ordinary business risks reimbursable?
Generally no under § 60-2-2. But § 60-2-3 requires indemnity when the employer's
want of ordinary care caused the loss.
Statutes and sources
- SDCL chapter 60-2 index. Current official chapter structure for employer
and employee obligations. Official index
(accessed July 14, 2026). - SDCL §§ 60-2-1 to 60-2-3. Necessary expenditures and losses, the
unlawful-direction exception, ordinary-risk and coworker-negligence
exclusions, and employer-carelessness losses. Official § 60-2-1
(accessed July 14, 2026). - SDCL § 60-11-2. Required continued-employment examination and records
costs, with misdemeanor classification. Official text
(accessed July 14, 2026).
Source links
Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.
Get the answer for your situation
You just read how South Dakota handles this in general. Ezel applies current South Dakota law to your facts and answers your specific question, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.