🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

North Dakota: Employee Expense Reimbursement Requirements

verified against the statute 2026-07-14 4 statute sources

The short answer

Yes. N.D.C.C. § 34-02-01 requires an employer to indemnify an employee for necessary expenditures or losses directly caused by duties or employer directions. Ordinary business risks and specified coworker-negligence losses are excluded, and tools or equipment also used outside work are not covered.

Ask Ezel about your situation

This is the general rule in North Dakota. Ezel applies current North Dakota law to your specific facts and answers with citations to the statutes.

Governing law and coverageN.D.C.C. §§ 34-02-01 to 34-02-03; general employer-to-employee indemnity duty with no employer-size or listed occupation threshold stated
Reimbursable expense standardAll the employee necessarily expends or loses in direct consequence of duties or obedience to employer directions (§ 34-02-01)
Authorization, direction, and primary benefitDischarge of employee duties or obedience to employer directions; no separate preapproval, ratification, or primary-benefit test stated (§ 34-02-01)
Excluded losses and employee faultOrdinary risks and specified coworker-negligence losses excluded; known-unlawful directions and tools/equipment also used outside work excluded (§§ 34-02-01 to -02)
Request deadline and documentationNo submission deadline, receipt, itemization, certification, or missing-document procedure stated (§§ 34-02-01 to -03)
Employer policy, preapproval, and capsNo express policy, preapproval, specification, cap, de minimis, deadline-extension, or waiver rule stated (§§ 34-02-01 to -03)
Payment deadline, method, and interestNo fixed payment deadline, clock trigger, method, advance, stipend, or interest rule stated (§§ 34-02-01 to -03)
Enforcement and remediesSections create the indemnity duty but state no agency procedure, statutory damages, penalty, fee rule, interest, or limitations formula (§§ 34-02-01 to -03)

Compare this rule across all 50 states + DC →

Requirements one by one

Necessary costs and losses tied directly to the work are covered

N.D.C.C. § 34-02-01 requires an employer to indemnify an employee for all the
employee “necessarily expends or loses” in direct consequence of duties or
obedience to employer directions.

The direction may be unlawful, but the protection does not extend to an
employee who believed the direction was unlawful when obeying it. The section
does not add a separate advance-approval or primary-benefit test.

Dual-use tools and equipment are expressly excluded

Section 34-02-01 excludes the cost of buying or renting tools of a trade or
other equipment that the employee also uses outside the scope of employment.
The exclusion turns on outside-work use; the statute does not create a fixed
percentage or depreciation formula for mixed use.

Ordinary risks and specified coworker losses are excluded

Under § 34-02-02, an employer generally need not indemnify losses caused by the
ordinary risks of the business. The section also excludes losses caused by a
coworker's negligence in the same general business unless the employer failed
to use ordinary care in selecting the culpable employee.

By contrast, § 34-02-03 says the employer must “in all cases” indemnify losses
caused by the employer's want of ordinary care.

The statutes supply no claim or payment procedure

Sections 34-02-01 to 34-02-03 state no employee submission deadline, receipt
form, itemization requirement, missing-document substitute, employer-policy
rule, reimbursement cap, payment clock, payment method, interest provision,
agency claim, statutory damages amount, attorney-fee rule, or limitations
formula.

What trips people up

A tool may be necessary for the job and still fall outside the indemnity duty if
the employee also uses it outside the scope of employment. Section 34-02-01
states that exclusion expressly.

The statute also does not set a category-specific mileage rate, phone
percentage, travel allowance, or home-office amount. Its text supplies a
necessary-cost and direct-consequence standard instead.

Common questions

Does North Dakota require advance approval?

Section 34-02-01 states no separate advance-approval requirement. It asks
whether the necessary expense or loss directly resulted from duties or employer
directions.

Must an employer pay for a tool the employee also uses personally?

Not under § 34-02-01's indemnity duty. The section excludes a tool of the trade
or other equipment also used outside the scope of employment.

Is there a statutory deadline for submitting receipts?

Not in §§ 34-02-01 to 34-02-03. Those sections state no submission period or
required receipt format.

Statutes and sources

  • North Dakota Century Code official-version notice. The Legislative Branch
    identifies its online Century Code as the official version. Official notice
    (accessed July 14, 2026).
  • N.D.C.C. §§ 34-02-01 to 34-02-03. Necessary expenditures and losses,
    unlawful directions, dual-use tools and equipment, ordinary risks, coworker
    negligence, and employer-carelessness losses. Official chapter PDF
    (accessed July 14, 2026).

Source links

Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.

N.D.C.C. § 34-02-01 · accessed 2026-07-14
N.D.C.C. § 34-02-02 · accessed 2026-07-14
N.D.C.C. § 34-02-03 · accessed 2026-07-14
This page is general legal information about state-law reimbursement of employee business expenses, not legal advice about a purchase, mileage claim, remote-work arrangement, reimbursement policy, or wage claim. The result can depend on whether the expense was necessary, reasonable, authorized or required, primarily for the employer's benefit, documented on time, and within valid policy limits. Separate federal, state, and local rules govern minimum wages, tax treatment, public-employee travel, workers' compensation, wage deductions, and independent contractors. Verified against the official statute, regulation, or agency material on the date shown; confirm current law or consult the state labor agency or a licensed attorney before relying on it.

Get the answer for your situation

You just read how North Dakota handles this in general. Ezel applies current North Dakota law to your facts and answers your specific question, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.