Connecticut: Employee Expense Reimbursement Requirements
The short answer
Connecticut has no general private-sector mandate requiring repayment of every necessary work expense. Its wage regulations require payment of travel expenses only when the employee's payment would reduce earnings below the minimum wage. Restaurant and hotel-restaurant employees have a separate right to transportation costs when required or permitted to travel between establishments during the workday.
Ask Ezel about your situation
This is the general rule in Connecticut. Ezel applies current Connecticut law to your specific facts and answers with citations to the statutes.
| Governing law and coverage | No general business-expense mandate. RCSA § 31-60-10 supplies a minimum-wage travel-cost floor; RCSA § 31-62-E10 separately covers restaurant and hotel-restaurant employees traveling between establishments |
|---|---|
| Reimbursable expense standard | General rule: expenses directly incidental to and resulting from covered travel, only when employee payment would bring earnings below minimum wage. Restaurant rule: transportation cost between establishments during the workday |
| Authorization, direction, and primary benefit | Employee must be required or permitted to make the covered travel; no separate advance-preapproval, ratification, or primary-benefit test stated (§§ 31-60-10, 31-62-E10) |
| Excluded losses and employee fault | No general negligence, ordinary-risk, theft, wear, commuting, or personal-cost list. Both rules are limited by travel category; the general rule also requires a minimum-wage impact |
| Request deadline and documentation | No expense-request deadline, receipt, itemization, certification, or missing-document substitute stated in §§ 31-60-10 or 31-62-E10 |
| Employer policy, preapproval, and caps | No general policy, preapproval, specification, or cap framework. Restaurant rule requires the transportation cost; general rule is capped by the amount needed to prevent a below-minimum-wage result |
| Payment deadline, method, and interest | No separate reimbursement clock, payment method, interest rule, or mileage rate stated; restaurant rule requires reimbursement of transportation cost |
| Enforcement and remedies | Restaurant-order complaints go to CTDOL Wage and Workplace Standards. CTDOL says it lacks authority over ordinary business-expense complaints; no reimbursement-specific damages, fees, interest, or limitations period stated in the cited materials |
Compare this rule across all 50 states + DC →
Requirements one by one
Most travel expenses are protected only at the wage floor
RCSA § 31-60-10(b) addresses expenses directly incidental to and resulting from
covered travel. The employer must pay them when leaving the cost with the
employee would bring the employee's earnings below the minimum fair wage.
That is a minimum-wage boundary, not a general promise to repay every necessary
business expense. The regulation states no mileage rate or general rule for
phones, home offices, tools, uniforms, supplies, or losses.
Restaurant travel between establishments has a broader rule
RCSA § 31-62-E10 applies to restaurant and hotel-restaurant occupations. When
an employee is required or permitted to travel from one establishment to
another after the workday begins or before it ends, the employer must pay the
travel time at the working rate and reimburse the transportation cost.
Unlike § 31-60-10(b), this industry rule does not condition transportation
reimbursement on the cost reducing earnings below minimum wage. It states no
fixed mileage rate, claim form, receipt rule, reimbursement deadline, payment
method, or interest rule.
Ordinary business-expense complaints are outside CTDOL authority
The Connecticut Department of Labor's current complaint instructions say the
Wage and Workplace Standards Division lacks statutory authority to investigate
“business expenses.” Mandatory Order No. 8 separately directs complaints about
the restaurant and hotel-restaurant order to that division.
The cited materials state no reimbursement-specific civil damages, attorney's
fees, interest, or limitations period. They should not be read as creating a
general expense claim beyond the two travel rules described here.
What trips people up
The two travel provisions use different triggers. Under § 31-60-10(b), the
employee-paid travel cost must reduce earnings below the minimum wage. Under
§ 31-62-E10, a covered restaurant or hotel-restaurant employee traveling
between establishments during the workday must receive the transportation
cost without that additional wage-floor condition.
Neither provision supplies Connecticut's state employees' travel schedule as a
rate for private employment. Public-employee travel rules are outside this
survey.
Common questions
Must every Connecticut employer reimburse business mileage?
No general private-sector mileage mandate or rate appears in the official
materials reviewed. The general travel rule applies only when the employee's
payment would reduce earnings below minimum wage, while the restaurant order
covers transportation between establishments during the workday.
Does a restaurant employee need to show the cost lowered wages below minimum?
Not under § 31-62-E10. That rule requires reimbursement of transportation costs
for covered inter-establishment travel during the workday without stating the
minimum-wage-impact condition found in § 31-60-10(b).
Is there a statutory receipt or 30-day submission rule?
Sections 31-60-10 and 31-62-E10 state no receipt format or expense-request
deadline.
Statutes and sources
- RCSA § 31-60-10(b). Travel expenses directly incidental to covered travel
must be paid when employee payment would reduce earnings below the minimum
fair wage. Official 2026 CTDOL poster
(accessed July 14, 2026). - RCSA § 31-62-E10 and Mandatory Order No. 8. Restaurant and hotel-
restaurant transportation reimbursement and the complaint direction.
Official 2026 CTDOL order
(accessed July 14, 2026). - Connecticut Department of Labor wage-complaint instructions. The division
states that ordinary business-expense complaints are outside its statutory
authority. Official instructions
(accessed July 14, 2026).
Source links
Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.
Get the answer for your situation
You just read how Connecticut handles this in general. Ezel applies current Connecticut law to your facts and answers your specific question, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.