🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Maine: Call and Conversation Recording Consent Requirements

verified against the statute 2026-07-20 7 statute sources

The short answer

Maine is a one-party consent state. Because a sender or receiver of a communication is not an 'interceptor,' you may record a call or conversation you take part in without anyone else's permission. Illegal interception is a Class C crime punishable by up to five years and a $5,000 fine, and a separate privacy law requires everyone's consent to record inside a bathroom, dressing room, or similar private place.

Ask Ezel about your situation

This is the general rule in Maine. Ezel applies current Maine law to your specific facts and answers with citations to the statutes.

Governing law and covered recording15 M.R.S. ch. 102 (Interception of Wire and Oral Communications); § 710 defines the offenses, § 709 the key terms, and § 711 the civil action. A separate crime, 17-A M.R.S. § 511, governs recording in a private place.
Whose consent a participant needsOne party. The offense reaches only 'interception,' and 'intercept' expressly excludes the sender or receiver and a person given prior authority by the sender or receiver (§ 709(4)). A participant is therefore not intercepting and may record.
Privacy, confidentiality, or secrecy triggerAn oral (in-person) communication is protected only when uttered under a justified expectation against interception (§ 709(5)). Words within another person's normal unaided hearing are outside the definition of intercept (§ 709(4)(B)). The § 511 private-place rule is location-based instead.
Telephone, in-person, and electronic coverageThe interception law covers 'wire' and 'oral' communications (§ 709(5), (7)); it does not define or reach 'electronic communications,' so texts, email, and data are boundary subjects under other law. A face-to-face conversation and a telephone call follow the same participant rule.
How consent or notice is givenBeing the sender or receiver is itself the lawful basis; otherwise the sender or receiver must give prior authority (§ 709(4)). No written form, tone, or script is prescribed.
Major participant-facing exceptionsThe definition of intercept excludes participants, persons within normal unaided hearing, and persons authorized by a party (§ 709(4)). Common-carrier employees, law enforcement, and designated corrections and jail officers are excepted from the offense (§ 710(1)). No general threat or self-help exception is stated.
Criminal classification and penaltyIllegal interception, disclosure, or use is a Class C crime (§ 710): up to 5 years' imprisonment (17-A M.R.S. § 1604) and a fine up to $5,000 (17-A M.R.S. § 1704). Recording in a private place is a Class D crime (17-A M.R.S. § 511).
Civil remedy and evidence effectAny party to a conversation intercepted, disclosed, or used in violation of the chapter may recover actual damages but not less than liquidated damages of $100 per day of violation, plus a reasonable attorney's fee and litigation costs (§ 711). A recording you lawfully make as a participant is not an interception.
Interstate and federal boundaryMaine's one-party rule tracks federal law, which lets a participant or a person with one party's consent record unless the purpose is criminal or tortious (18 U.S.C. § 2511(2)(d)). A stricter state on the other end of an interstate call may still apply, so all-party consent is the prudent baseline.

Compare this rule across all 50 states + DC →

Requirements one by one

Governing law and covered recording

Maine's recording rules are in 15 M.R.S. chapter 102, "Interception of Wire and Oral Communications." Section 710 sets out the offenses, § 709 supplies the definitions that do the real work, and § 711 creates the civil claim. A separate provision of the Criminal Code, 17-A M.R.S. § 511, governs recording inside a private place and applies a stricter rule there.

Whose consent a participant needs

Maine reaches its one-party result through a definition. The offense in § 710 punishes only an "interception," and "intercept" is defined to mean hearing or recording a communication "by any person other than ... the sender or receiver of that communication" or "a person given prior authority by the sender or receiver" (§ 709(4)). A participant is a sender or receiver, so recording your own call or conversation is not an interception at all — no one else's consent is required.

Privacy, confidentiality, or secrecy trigger

For in-person speech, protection depends on privacy. An "oral communication" is covered only when "uttered by a person exhibiting an expectation that such communication is not subject to interception under circumstances justifying such expectation" (§ 709(5)). And words spoken within another person's "range of normal unaided hearing" are outside the definition of intercept (§ 709(4)(B)). The § 511 private-place rule works differently: it protects a location regardless of any particular speaker's expectation.

Telephone, in-person, and electronic coverage

Chapter 102 covers "wire" and "oral" communications (§ 709(5), (7)). It does not define or reach "electronic communications," so text messages, email, and stored data are governed by other law, not by this chapter's participant rule. A telephone call and a face-to-face conversation follow the same rule: a participant may record.

How consent or notice is given

Being the sender or receiver is itself the lawful basis. If you are not a party, the sender or receiver must give you "prior authority" to record (§ 709(4)(C)). Maine prescribes no particular form — no writing, tone, or script is required.

Major participant-facing exceptions

The definition of intercept already excludes participants, people within normal unaided hearing, and anyone a party authorizes (§ 709(4)). On top of that, the offense in § 710 does not apply to communication-carrier employees, law enforcement officers, or designated corrections and jail investigative officers carrying out permitted practices. The chapter states no general "evidence of a threat" or self-help exception for a private person, but a participant does not need one because participant recording is not an interception.

Criminal classification and penalty

Illegal interception, disclosure, or use is a Class C crime (§ 710). A Class C crime carries up to five years' imprisonment (17-A M.R.S. § 1604) and a fine up to $5,000 (17-A M.R.S. § 1704). Recording inside a private place without the consent of those entitled to privacy is a separate, lower-grade offense — violation of privacy, a Class D crime (17-A M.R.S. § 511).

Civil remedy and evidence effect

Section 711 gives "any party to a conversation" that is intercepted, disclosed, or used in violation of the chapter a civil claim for actual damages, but not less than liquidated damages of $100 per day of violation, plus a reasonable attorney's fee and litigation costs. A recording you lawfully make as a participant is not an interception, so it does not expose you to that liability; the remedy targets recordings made by non-participants without authority.

Interstate and federal boundary

Maine's one-party rule lines up with federal law, which permits a participant, or a person with one party's prior consent, to record unless the purpose is criminal or tortious (18 U.S.C. § 2511(2)(d)). That agreement does not settle an interstate call. If the other participant is in an all-party state, that state's stricter law may govern the recording made there, so getting everyone's consent is the safe course when a call crosses state lines.

What trips people up

The private-place rule can override your participant status. Even though you may record a conversation you are part of, 17-A M.R.S. § 511 makes it a crime to install or use a device to record inside a "private place" — expressly including "changing or dressing rooms, bathrooms and similar places" — without the consent of everyone entitled to privacy there. Being in the room is not enough in those settings.

Chapter 102 is about wire and oral audio, not texts. The interception law covers wire and oral communications; it does not define electronic communications (§ 709). Do not assume the participant rule answers questions about recording or capturing text messages, email, or app data — those turn on other law.

Disclosing or using an illegal recording is its own crime. Section 710(3) makes it a Class C crime to knowingly disclose or use the contents of a communication you know was obtained through interception, so passing along someone else's illegal recording creates fresh exposure.

Common questions

Do I have to tell the other person I am recording our call? No. As the sender or receiver you are not "intercepting" the communication, so no notice or consent from the other party is required (§ 709(4)).

Can I hide a recorder in a bathroom or dressing room? No. That is a private place under 17-A M.R.S. § 511, and recording there without the consent of those entitled to privacy is a Class D crime, even in a space you can enter.

What if the person I am calling is in an all-party state? Maine law permits your recording, but the other state's stricter rule may apply to the call. When a conversation crosses state lines, get consent from everyone to stay on the safe side.

Statutes and sources

  • 15 M.R.S. § 709 — definitions; the participant-excluding definition of "intercept" and the oral-communication privacy trigger. https://legislature.maine.gov/statutes/15/title15sec709.html (accessed 2026-07-20)
  • 15 M.R.S. § 710 — interception, disclosure, and use offenses (Class C). https://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/15/title15sec710.html (accessed 2026-07-20)
  • 15 M.R.S. § 711 — civil remedy, liquidated damages, and attorney's fees. https://legislature.maine.gov/statutes/15/title15sec711.html (accessed 2026-07-20)
  • 17-A M.R.S. §§ 1604, 1704 — Class C imprisonment and fine limits. https://legislature.maine.gov/statutes/17-A/title17-Asec1604.html (accessed 2026-07-20)
  • 17-A M.R.S. § 511 — violation of privacy; private-place recording. https://legislature.maine.gov/statutes/17-A/title17-Asec511.html (accessed 2026-07-20)
  • 18 U.S.C. § 2511(2)(d) — federal one-party consent rule. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title18-section2511&num=0&edition=prelim (accessed 2026-07-20)

Source links

Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.

15 M.R.S. § 709 · accessed 2026-07-20
15 M.R.S. § 710 · accessed 2026-07-20
17-A M.R.S. § 1604 · accessed 2026-07-20
17-A M.R.S. § 1704 · accessed 2026-07-20
15 M.R.S. § 711 · accessed 2026-07-20
17-A M.R.S. § 511 · accessed 2026-07-20
18 U.S.C. § 2511(2)(d) · accessed 2026-07-20
This page is general legal information about state call and conversation recording law, not legal advice or permission to record a particular person. The result can depend on who is participating, where each person and the recording device are located, the communication medium, whether the setting is private or confidential, how notice or consent was given, and why the recording is made or used. Interstate choice of law is fact-specific, and a stricter state rule may apply even when federal law or another state would permit one-participant consent. Separate rules govern nonparticipant interception, law enforcement, public meetings, hidden-camera images, workplaces, health and financial information, customer-service calls, and later disclosure. Criminal charges, civil damages, and exclusion of evidence may be possible. Verified against the official statute text on the date shown; obtain consent from every participant when potentially applicable rules differ, and consult a licensed attorney before recording or using a recording in a disputed or interstate matter.

Get the answer for your situation

You just read how Maine handles this in general. Ezel applies current Maine law to your facts and answers your specific question, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.