South Carolina: Anti-SLAPP Laws
The short answer
No. South Carolina has no anti-SLAPP statute, special early-dismissal motion, automatic discovery stay, SLAPP-specific burden shift, fee award, or interlocutory appeal. A litigant must use ordinary civil procedure, while the general Frivolous Civil Proceedings Sanctions Act may support sanctions for a frivolous filing; the two anti-SLAPP proposals from the 2025-2026 session died when the regular session adjourned sine die on May 14, 2026.
Ask Ezel about your situation
This is the general rule in South Carolina. Ezel applies current South Carolina law to your specific facts and answers with citations to the statutes.
| Governing law | None enacted. The official current Title 15 index contains no anti-SLAPP chapter, and current Chapter 3 contains Articles 1, 2, 3, and 5 — not the proposed Article 7. The only nearby statewide scheme is the general South Carolina Frivolous Civil Proceedings Sanctions Act, S.C. Code § 15-36-10. H.3305/S.43 and H.5420 did not become law before the 2025-2026 regular session adjourned sine die on May 14, 2026 |
|---|---|
| What speech/conduct is protected | N/A No South Carolina anti-SLAPP statute defines protected petitioning, speech, press, assembly, or association activity |
| Special motion to strike/dismiss | N/A No anti-SLAPP special motion, filing deadline, expedited hearing, ruling deadline, or automatic discovery stay. Ordinary civil-procedure motions apply |
| Burden of proof | N/A No SLAPP-specific burden shift or evidentiary screen. Ordinary pleading and summary-judgment standards apply; § 15-36-10 separately uses a reasonable-attorney/frivolousness standard for sanctions |
| Attorney's fees | No SLAPP-specific fee shifting. Under the general sanctions act, a court may impose a just sanction for a violating filing, and sanctions may include the prevailing party's reasonable costs and attorney's fees (§ 15-36-10(B)(2), (G)(1)) |
| Appeal rights | N/A No anti-SLAPP interlocutory appeal or expedited appeal exists. Ordinary appellate rules govern |
| Exemptions | N/A There is no anti-SLAPP statute and therefore no statutory exemptions list |
Compare this rule across all 50 states + DC →
Requirements one by one
What applies without an anti-SLAPP statute
South Carolina has no special statutory procedure for a claim based on speech, petitioning,
press, assembly, or association. The official current Title 15 index contains no anti-SLAPP
chapter, and Chapter 3 has no Article 7 of the kind the failed bills proposed. A defendant
therefore uses the ordinary civil rules; there is no anti-SLAPP filing deadline, automatic
discovery stay, special evidentiary screen, mandatory prevailing-movant fee award, or special
interlocutory appeal.
The closest statewide statute is the general Frivolous Civil Proceedings Sanctions Act,
S.C. Code § 15-36-10. It applies to civil litigation generally, not only to speech cases. A
signature certifies that a reasonable attorney would view the filing as legally supportable,
not intended merely to harass, and not frivolous or interposed for delay. A violation can
produce a sanction the court considers "just, equitable, and proper," including reasonable
costs and attorney's fees (§ 15-36-10(B)(2), (G)(1)). That is a sanctions mechanism, not an
early anti-SLAPP motion.
What trips people up
- Old bill trackers can still make H.3305 or H.5420 look pending. H.3305 stopped after a
second Senate reading in May 2025; H.5420 never left House Judiciary. The regular session
adjourned sine die on May 14, 2026, so both proposals died and would need to be introduced
again in a later General Assembly. - General sanctions are not anti-SLAPP protection. Section 15-36-10 can penalize a
frivolous filing, but it does not create an automatic stay, expedited hearing, special
burden shift, or speech-specific right to fees and appeal.
Common questions
Does filing a motion to dismiss automatically stop discovery?
No. South Carolina has no anti-SLAPP automatic stay. Any stay must come from the ordinary
civil rules or a court order applicable to the case.
Can H.3305 still become law without being reintroduced?
No. It did not complete Senate passage before the 2025-2026 regular session ended. The
official Senate Journal records sine die adjournment on May 14, 2026.
Can a court award fees for a frivolous speech-related lawsuit?
Potentially under the general sanctions act. Section 15-36-10(G)(1) allows reasonable costs
and attorney's fees as a sanction, but only under that general statute's standards — not
through a special anti-SLAPP prevailing-party rule.
Statutes and sources
- S.C. Code Title 15 index and Chapter 3 — current civil-remedies structure; no enacted anti-SLAPP chapter or proposed Article 7. https://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/title15.php and https://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t15c003.php (accessed 2026-07-16)
- S.C. Code § 15-36-10 — general frivolous-civil-proceedings standards and available sanctions. https://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t15c036.php (accessed 2026-07-16)
- H.3305 and H.5420 — final official bill histories before the session ended. https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess126_2025-2026/bills/3305.htm and https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess126_2025-2026/bills/5420.htm (accessed 2026-07-16)
- South Carolina Senate Journal, May 15, 2026 — records that the regular session adjourned sine die on May 14, 2026. https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess126_2025-2026/sj26/20260515.htm (accessed 2026-07-16)
Source links
Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.
Get the answer for your situation
You just read how South Carolina handles this in general. Ezel applies current South Carolina law to your facts and answers your specific question, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.