Minnesota Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board Ethics Opinions
Free plain-English summaries of legal ethics opinions issued by the Minnesota Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board, with full citations and source links on every page.
No Minnesota Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board opinions match these filters
Try a different search term or clear the filters.
When is using 'Associates' or '& Associates' in a Minnesota firm name misleading?
The opinion concludes that using 'Associates' in a firm name is false and misleading unless at least two licensed attorneys practice with the firm, and using '& Associates' is misleading unless at lea…
How must a Minnesota lawyer keep a law practice separate from debt-collection-agency work?
Under this now-repealed opinion, a lawyer involved with a debt collection agency had to keep the law practice visibly separate, supervise lay staff, personally sign legal documents, protect client con…
Browse Minnesota Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board opinions by topic
Legal ethics opinions from the Minnesota Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board interpret the rules of professional conduct for working lawyers, in response to inquiries from members and committees. They are not binding like court discipline decisions, but courts and discipline boards treat formal opinions as substantial guidance on how the rules apply. Every opinion above has a plain-English question and short answer, plus a link to the original source on the bar's site.