State Bar of California Ethics Opinions
Free plain-English summaries of legal ethics opinions issued by the State Bar of California, with full citations and source links on every page.
No State Bar of California opinions match these filters
Try a different search term or clear the filters.
What must a California lawyer do when charging a flat fee, refunding an advance flat fee after early termination, or renegotiating a flat fee mid-engagement?
The opinion concludes a California lawyer must clearly state which services the flat fee covers and when it is earned, must refund any unearned portion of an advance flat fee on early termination (eve…
Are California lawyers required to have a succession plan, and what duties does an assisting attorney take on?
California has no rule that expressly mandates a succession plan, but the combined duties of competence, diligence, communication, withdrawal, safekeeping client property, and supervision require ever…
How should a California lawyer represent a client whose decision-making capacity may be impaired, and when may the lawyer take protective action?
The opinion concludes that the lawyer should preserve a normal lawyer-client relationship insofar as possible; that informed, disinterested judgments about capacity will not be treated as unethical in…
When a California lawyer or law-firm colleague has a mental impairment affecting their practice, what do that lawyer, their subordinates, and their supervisors have to do?
An impairment does not excuse the impaired lawyer from any duty. It triggers parallel duties for that lawyer's subordinates, supervisors, and other colleagues who know of the conduct, including commun…
What ethical duties does a California lawyer owe when a third-party litigation funder is involved in the case?
Per California Formal Opinion 2020-204, lawyers must preserve independent professional judgment, comply with the duty of confidentiality, obtain the client's informed written consent before sharing co…
What are a California lawyer's ethical duties to prevent and respond to a data breach involving confidential client information?
Per California Formal Opinion 2020-203, lawyers must assess the risks of keeping confidential client information on electronic devices and take reasonable steps to secure those systems. After a breach…
May a California lawyer advise and assist a client in operating a cannabis business that is lawful under California law but unlawful under federal law?
Per California Formal Opinion 2020-202, yes. A California lawyer may advise and assist a client in conduct permitted by California cannabis laws even though that conduct may violate federal law, provi…
What ethical duties do a departing California lawyer and the lawyer's old firm owe to clients during the transition?
Per California Formal Opinion 2020-201, both the departing lawyer and the law firm must put the client's interests first, give timely notice to clients for whom the departing lawyer is principally res…
What must a California civil-trial lawyer do when a client's witness has testified or will testify falsely?
Under California Formal Opinion 2019-200, an attorney may use evidence that is merely suspected to be false but must refuse to present testimony known to be perjured even on the client's instruction; …
May a California lawyer who must withdraw because the client's claim lacks merit try to settle the case before withdrawing?
Per California Formal Opinion 2019-198, yes. The attorney's duty under Rule 1.16(d) to avoid reasonably foreseeable prejudice may be satisfied by negotiating a settlement before withdrawal, provided t…
When can a California lawyer consult outside counsel or law-firm in-house counsel about a current client's matter without creating a conflict and what must the lawyer tell the client?
Per California Formal Opinion 2019-197, the act of seeking legal advice about ethical compliance is not itself a conflict and need not be disclosed; once the lawyer learns of an error that could preju…
If a California lawyer represents a debtor in a pro bono simple, no-asset Chapter 7 bankruptcy and concurrently represents one of the debtor's creditors in an unrelated matter, must the lawyer obtain informed written consent from both clients?
Per California Formal Opinion 2014-191, no informed written consent is required under former Rule 3-310(C)(3) because a simple, no-asset Chapter 7 is an in rem proceeding that does not create direct a…
When a California law firm dissolves, what does each attorney (lead partner, associate on the matter, partner unrelated to the matter) owe each client of the firm under the duty to avoid foreseeable prejudice on withdrawal?
Per California Formal Opinion 2014-190, every attorney at the dissolving firm (regardless of partner/associate status or prior contact with the client) owes the client a duty under former Rule 3-700(A…
In a transactional negotiation, does a California lawyer have a duty to alert opposing counsel to (A) an apparent material error opposing counsel made or (B) a material change the lawyer made in revised contract language?
Per California Formal Opinion 2013-189, no duty arises in Scenario A if the lawyer did not induce opposing counsel's error; in Scenario B, once the lawyer realizes that an unintended defect in the red…
If a California lawyer receives from a third party what appears to be a privileged communication between opposing counsel and opposing counsel's client, can the lawyer read it under a crime-fraud theory?
Per California Formal Opinion 2013-188, the lawyer may not read the communication even if she suspects the crime-fraud exception applies; she must promptly notify opposing counsel and may not use the …
May a California lawyer run a virtual law office where all client communication and storage are handled through a third-party cloud vendor's portal, and what does she have to do to comply with her ethical obligations?
Per California Formal Opinion 2012-184, the Rules of Professional Conduct do not impose greater duties on a VLO than on a traditional office, but the cloud-only structure triggers specific due-diligen…
When a California lawyer needs to serve a discovery subpoena on a current client of the lawyer's firm in an unrelated matter, is that a conflict, and can it be cured by informed written consent?
Per California Formal Opinion 2011-182, serving a discovery subpoena on a current client is adverse and a conflict, but the firm may accept the new representation if it obtains informed written consen…
When a California lawyer settles a fee dispute with a client, may the settlement agreement include a general release and a Civil Code section 1542 waiver that also covers legal malpractice, and what does the lawyer have to do first?
Per California Formal Opinion 2009-178, a lawyer must promptly disclose to the client the facts giving rise to any actual or potential malpractice claim before entering into such a settlement. The law…
In a California case under a fee-shifting statute, may plaintiff's counsel block a settlement her client wants to accept because it waives statutory fees, and does defense counsel violate any ethical rule by recommending or conveying a fee-waiver settlement offer, either in a particular case or as a general practice?
Per California Formal Opinion 2009-176, no on all three counts. Plaintiff's counsel must inform the client of a fee-waiver settlement offer and consummate it in accordance with the client's wishes, ev…
What ethical duties does a California lawyer owe when hiring an outside contract attorney to make court appearances, and what duties does the contract attorney owe to the hiring lawyer's client?
Per California Formal Opinion 2004-165, the hiring lawyer must disclose the contract attorney's involvement when it is a significant development under former Rule 3-500 and Business and Professions Co…
What may a California lawyer do for a missing client who already authorized settlement of claims within a defined range, and how must the lawyer handle settlement proceeds and fees?
Per California Formal Opinion 2002-160, an attorney who has been given express authority to settle claims at or above a specified percentage of face value retains independent ethical duties (competenc…
Can a California lawyer jointly represent a close corporation and the controlling shareholder in a lawsuit brought by the only other shareholder against both, and who provides the corporation's consent?
Per California Formal Opinion 1999-153, under the facts presented a lawyer may jointly represent the corporation and the controlling shareholder under former Rule 3-310(C)(1) only if their interests a…
If one lawyer in a California firm received material confidential information from a former client, may another lawyer in the same firm accept a representation adverse to that former client without obtaining the former client's informed written consent?
Per California Formal Opinion 1998-152, the second lawyer is not subject to discipline under former Rule 3-310(E) because the rule references the individual 'member', not the firm; the imputed-knowled…
When discovery sanctions are sought (or awarded) against a California lawyer and the client jointly, what must the lawyer do to satisfy the duties to inform the client, oppose the motion, and (where necessary) withdraw?
Per California Formal Opinion 1997-151, a motion for discovery sanctions against the lawyer and client is ordinarily a significant development the lawyer must communicate under former Rule 3-500; an o…
When a California lawyer works on more than one client's matter during the same time period, may the lawyer bill each client a full hourly rate (or a multiple of it) for that time?
Per California Formal Opinion 1996-147, a lawyer may not bill more than one client at full hourly rates for the same time period, or bill a single client a multiple of that rate for shared time, unles…
If a California lawyer discovers that the client is committing an ongoing fraud and the client has used the lawyer's services to advance it, what may the lawyer say, what must the lawyer refuse to do, and when must the lawyer withdraw?
Per California Formal Opinion 1996-146, the lawyer must preserve client confidences under Business and Professions Code section 6068(e) and may not disclose the fraud, but also must not participate in…
Can a California lawyer advise a client to buy insurance, refer the client to a specific insurance agent, and accept a commission from that agent for the referral?
Per California Formal Opinion 1995-140, a lawyer may do so only by making full written disclosure under former Rule 3-310(B)(4) of the referral arrangement and its actual and reasonably foreseeable ad…
When a California lawyer is hired by an insurer to defend an insured, who is the client when the lawyer learns information that calls coverage into question, and what must the lawyer do?
Per California Formal Opinion 1995-139, the lawyer owes loyalty to the insured. Information adverse to the insurer learned in defense of the insured may not be disclosed to the insurer under Business …
When does a California lawyer's compensation of a non-employee outside lawyer constitute a 'division of fees' triggering former Rule 2-200's client-consent requirement, and when must the client be told about the outside lawyer's involvement?
Per California Formal Opinion 1994-138, former Rule 2-200(A) applies when the outside lawyer is paid a portion of the fee paid by the client. It does not apply where (1) the amount paid to the outside…
Can a California lawyer contract with a client at the outset of representation in a civil rights case that the client irrevocably assigns to the lawyer the right to seek and collect attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. section 1988, so the client cannot waive that right in settlement?
Per California Formal Opinion 1994-136, such agreements are not prohibited in 42 U.S.C. section 1988 actions so long as the lawyer fully complies with former Rule 3-300 (business transactions or pecun…
Under a California contingent fee agreement, if the contract is silent on payment from a structured settlement, may the lawyer take her fee in full from the up-front cash payment, or can she agree in advance to do so?
Per California Formal Opinion 1994-135, where the contract is silent, the lawyer may take her fee only on the same pro rata basis the client receives compensation; she cannot front-load her fee at set…
After a California client discharges counsel in a pending litigation matter but no substitution of counsel has been filed, what are the lawyer's ongoing duties to the client, and may the lawyer hold the client's file until the substitution is filed?
Per California Formal Opinion 1994-134, the lawyer remains the attorney of record (and is bound by competence and protect-from-prejudice duties) until the substitution form is filed or the tribunal ot…
Under former California Rule 2-100, may a lawyer counsel her client about the strategy and content of a direct communication the client wishes to have with the opposing party, who is represented by counsel?
Per California Formal Opinion 1993-131, former Rule 2-100 prohibits an attorney from communicating directly or indirectly on the merits with a represented opposing party without that party's counsel's…
Under former California Rule 5-100, may a lawyer's settlement demand letter say that 'all available legal remedies will be pursued' if a prompt settlement is not reached, when the dispute could also support criminal or administrative action?
Per California Formal Opinion 1991-124, yes. The committee concluded that 'all available legal remedies will be pursued' was ambiguous and was not, by itself, the overt threat to present criminal, adm…
May a California attorney-client retainer agreement include a mandatory binding arbitration clause for future malpractice claims against the attorney?
Per California Formal Opinion 1989-116, yes. The committee opined that nothing in the rules prohibits an arbitration provision in the initial retainer. For an initial retainer (no prior attorney-clien…
In a federal civil rights or other private-attorney-general case, must a California lawyer tell the client that the client can settle by waiving the statutory attorney's fees, even though doing so will leave the lawyer unpaid?
Per California Formal Opinion 1989-114, yes. Because the U.S. Supreme Court treated statutory fee awards as the client's property, the lawyer's duties of communication under former Rules 3-500 and 3-5…
May a California attorney institute conservatorship proceedings for a client who appears to be incompetent but who has not consented to the conservatorship?
Per California Formal Opinion 1989-112, no. The committee opined that initiating conservatorship over the client's objection would force the attorney to disclose client secrets in violation of Busines…
If a California civil defense lawyer has been served with a complaint, the answer is due, and the client has disappeared, what may the lawyer do, and what must the lawyer disclose to the court or to opposing counsel?
Per California Formal Opinion 1989-111, the attorney must take reasonable steps to avoid reasonably foreseeable prejudice (including filing the answer where appropriate), make a diligent effort to loc…
Is it unethical for a California attorney to represent two unrelated clients while arguing opposite sides of the same legal question before the same federal judge?
Per California Formal Opinion 1989-108, no. The committee opined that even where there is a substantial likelihood that one or both clients will be prejudiced, taking opposite legal positions for diff…
When a law firm dissolves or a lawyer leaves, what must the firm and lawyers tell clients about choosing counsel?
The committee concluded that both the firm and the departing attorneys owe a fiduciary duty to give clients fair, accurate, and timely notice of the change so each client can make an informed choice o…
Can a lawyer competently represent a client they cannot speak with directly in a shared language?
The committee concluded that a lawyer need not personally speak the client's language, but competence requires adequate communication, so the lawyer must use an interpreter, translator, or bilingual c…
Can a lawyer disclose a damaging expert report to third parties at risk if the client instructs the lawyer not to disclose it?
The committee concluded that, where the client instructed the lawyers not to disclose an engineer's report warning that a structure might fail in an earthquake, the lawyers could not disclose it to th…
Can a California lawyer put a binding fee-arbitration clause in a retainer agreement that the client signs before any fee dispute exists?
The committee concluded that a lawyer may not condition employment on a client's advance agreement to binding fee arbitration; a binding waiver of the right to a trial de novo may be made only after a…
Can a California lawyer charge interest on a client's past-due bill, and can the lawyer change the interest rate later?
The committee concluded that a lawyer may charge interest on past-due receivables if the client gives informed consent in advance, and that the rate may not later be changed unless the original fee ag…
Can a California lawyer defend a subordinate in a criminal case when the boss pays the fee on the condition that the subordinate not cooperate with the prosecution?
The committee concluded the representation may not properly be undertaken under those facts. Even with the subordinate's informed written consent, the lawyer could not honestly assure the client that …
Browse State Bar of California opinions by topic
Legal ethics opinions from the State Bar of California interpret the rules of professional conduct for working lawyers, in response to inquiries from members and committees. They are not binding like court discipline decisions, but courts and discipline boards treat formal opinions as substantial guidance on how the rules apply. Every opinion above has a plain-English question and short answer, plus a link to the original source on the bar's site.