🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Federal agency decisions, searchable in plain English.

Workplace-safety cases from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) and mine-safety cases from the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (FMSHRC), each with a plain-English summary, the standards it cites, and whether it counts as precedent. More agencies are coming.

5,577 decisions and counting · Latest decision July 17, 2026
5 decisions 29 C.F.R. § 1926.600(a)(6)

No decisions match these filters

Try a different search term or clear the filters.

COMM

Lake Erie Construction Co.

Vehicle-standard coverage made location-specific and case remanded

A Lake Erie Construction crew was removing highway guardrail posts when a truck-mounted attachment contacted or came close enough to an overhead power line for electricity to travel through the equipment and fatally injure an employee holding a chain. OSHA cited the company for willfully failing to…

September 24, 2015
Remanded
ALJ

Harry C. Crooker & Sons, Inc.

Excavator had to maintain clearance from an energized service line

A foreman operated an excavator with its boom six to seven feet from an energized 240-volt service drop while performing street reconstruction work. The applicable construction standard required at least ten feet of clearance. The ALJ held that the general-industry electrical rule did not displace…

October 5, 2007 ·Covette Rooney
Citations affirmed
ALJ

Hein Masonry Inc.

Forklift operated too close to energized power lines

Hein Masonry used a rough-terrain forklift to raise masonry materials beside scaffolding at a Wisconsin construction site. The forklift's metal platform came within about three to five feet of energized 13-kilovolt power lines, although the standard required at least 10 feet of clearance. A utility…

June 28, 2007 ·Benjamin R. Loye
Citations affirmed
ALJ

Globe Contractors, Inc.

Power-line and trench items affirmed, inspection item vacated

OSHA inspected Globe's underground-construction site on a public road and observed a backhoe operating within ten feet of an overhead wire and an employee standing on a ladder and later a water main inside an unprotected trench. The judge rejected Globe's warrant and inspection-conduct objections…

October 30, 1996 ·Benjamin R. Loye
Mixed result
COMM

Tri-City Construction Company

Willful power-line violation carries maximum penalty

A Tri-City employee operated a backhoe beneath a 7,200-volt overhead line and contacted it. The company knew the power-line hazard, did not use a designated observer while the backhoe traveled beneath the line, and could have sought de-energization or protective covering from the utility. The…

June 18, 1980
Citations affirmed

What these documents are

  • Commission decisions: Rulings by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission itself, the highest level of agency review. These are citable as Commission precedent, though a decision may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance.
  • ALJ decisions: Rulings by OSHRC Administrative Law Judges after a hearing. When no Commissioner directs review, an ALJ decision becomes a final order under 29 U.S.C. § 661(j): it binds the parties in that case but is not binding precedent in other cases.
  • Why finality matters: Every page here says which kind of decision you are reading, so you know whether it is precedent you can cite or a final order that only shows how one judge ruled on one set of facts.
  • Where they come from: Every page links the official OSHRC public release, and the full text on the page is that release. The plain-English summaries are written by Ezel.