🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
VA P.D. 14-94 BPOL Tax 2014-06-24

Was a common carrier created after the Interstate Commerce Commission was abolished exempt from Virginia local BPOL tax merely because it registered with the FMCSA?

Short answer: No. Under the statute as written in 2014, the carrier had to have been formerly certified by the Interstate Commerce Commission or meet the specified Surface Transportation Board registration language. FMCSA registration did not satisfy that wording, and a business created after the ICC's 1995 abolition could not have former ICC certification.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2014. Ezel answers yours, under current Virginia tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2014
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Virginia Tax Commissioner advisory opinion issued to a town on a locally administered BPOL tax. It applied the carrier-exemption language and federal registration structure in effect in 2014 to the facts presented; later statutory changes or different certification history can change the result. The town, not the Department, administers the tax. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Subject

Post-ICC common carrier did not qualify for BPOL exemption

Plain-English summary

Virginia advised that a common carrier established after the Interstate Commerce Commission was abolished did not qualify for the local BPOL carrier exemption. The carrier had a definite place of business in the town and was registered with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration for insurance purposes.

The 2014 statute exempted a carrier formerly certified by the ICC or presently registered for insurance purposes with the Surface Transportation Board under the quoted federal structure. The opinion explained that the FMCSA took over insurance-registration functions from the STB in 2000, but the Virginia exemption still used the older wording. Because tax exemptions are strictly construed, FMCSA registration alone did not meet the text.

The ICC was abolished in 1995. If the taxpayer was created afterward, it could not have been formerly certified by the ICC and therefore did not qualify under the other route either.

What this means for you

  • A business must satisfy the exemption statute's exact certification or registration terms.
  • Federal agency reorganizations do not automatically rewrite a state tax exemption.
  • This was a 2014 advisory opinion; carriers and localities should verify the current statute before applying it today.

Citations and references

  • Va. Code §§ 58.1-3701 and 58.1-3703 C 1.
  • 49 C.F.R. § 387.7.

Source

Original ruling text

June 24, 2014

Re: Request for Advisory Opinion

Business, Professional and Occupational License (BPOL) Tax

Dear *:

This is in response to your letter in which the * (the "Town") requests an advisory opinion as to whether a common carrier is exempt from the Business, Professional and Occupational License (BPOL) tax.

The local license fee and tax are imposed and administered by local officials. Virginia Code § 58.1-3701 authorizes the Department to issue advisory opinions on local license tax issues. The following opinion has been made subject to the facts presented to the Department summarized below. Any change in facts or the introduction of new facts may lead to a different result.

The Code of Virginia sections, regulation and public documents cited are available on-line at www.tax.virginia.gov in the Laws, Rules and Decisions section of the Department's web site.

FACTS

An enterprise (the "Taxpayer") with a definite place of business in the Town operates as a common carrier. The Taxpayer is registered with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) for insurance purposes. The Town requests an advisory opinion as to whether the Taxpayer qualifies for the exemption provided by Va. Code § 58.1-3703 C 1.

OPINION

Virginia Code § 58.1-3703 C 1 provides an exemption from BPOL taxation to "any public service corporation or any motor carrier, common carrier, or other carrier of passengers or property formerly certified by the Interstate Commerce Commission or presently registered for insurance purposes with the Surface Transportation Board of the United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration . . .".

By reason of their character as legislative grants, statutes relating to exemptions allowed against a tax liability must be strictly construed against the taxpayer and in favor of the taxing authority. See DKM Richmond Associates, L.P. v. City of Richmond , 249 Va. 401, 457 S.E.2d 76 (1995). As such, any taxpayer seeking to claim the exemption afforded by Va. Code § 58.1-3703 C 1 must meet the exemption's specific requirements.

Established on January 1, 2000, one of the functions of FMSCA was to take over the registration process for proof of insurance from the STB. See 49 C.F.R. § 387.7. Accordingly, public service corporations, motor carriers, common carriers, or other carrier of passengers or property no longer register for insurance purposes with the STB. Consequently, the only way a public service corporation or any motor carrier, common carrier, or other carrier of passengers or property can qualify for the exemption under Va. Code § 58.1-3703 C 1 as currently drafted is if they were formerly certified by the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC).

The ICC was abolished in 1995. If the Taxpayer was established after the dissolution of the ICC, it could not have been certified by the ICC and would not qualify for the exemption provided by Va. Code § 58.1-3703 C 1.

If you have any questions regarding this response, you may contact * in the Office of Tax Policy, Appeals and Rulings, at ***.

Sincerely,

Craig M. Burns

Tax Commissioner

AR/1-5627409908.B

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2014 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Virginia tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.