🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
VA P.D. 14-49 Fiduciary Income Tax 2014-04-02

Would appointing a Virginia resident to a limited co-trustee committee make three out-of-state trusts Virginia resident trusts?

Short answer: No. The trusts were created outside Virginia by non-Virginia grantors, owned no Virginia property, and were administered in another state. The Virginia co-trustee could not act individually and would participate only in out-of-state committee meetings setting distributions. On those facts, the trusts were not administered in Virginia, were not resident trusts, and did not have to file Virginia fiduciary returns.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2014. Ezel answers yours, under current Virginia tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2014
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Virginia Tax Commissioner ruling on three proposed generation-skipping trust arrangements. The result depended on non-Virginia creation, grantors, property, administration, committee meetings, and the Virginia co-trustee's inability to control a trust individually. Acceptance of broader authority, Virginia operations, Virginia assets, court supervision, or later law can change the result. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Virginia said the proposed resident co-trustee would not make the three generation-skipping trusts Virginia resident trusts. The trusts would not have to file Virginia fiduciary income tax returns on the stated facts.

The trusts were established outside Virginia by grantors who had never lived in Virginia. They held no Virginia property and were administered in another state by a corporate trustee responsible for portfolio management, tax filings, distributions, and day-to-day operations.

The proposed Virginia co-trustee would join a committee that set annual distributions. He could not make trust decisions individually and would participate in committee meetings in the other state.

Va. Code § 58.1-302 included a trust administered in Virginia within the resident-trust definition, and 23 VAC 10-115-10 generally treated a trust as Virginia-administered if its assets were here, its fiduciary was a Virginia resident, or a Virginia court supervised it.

Prior Department rulings recognized a narrower committee situation: when no member could exercise individual control, Virginia membership did not create a resident trust so long as the committee did not operate or remain controlled in Virginia. That rule applied here.

What this means for you

  • A Virginia fiduciary can create residency risk, but authority and where administration occurs matter.
  • Document whether a co-trustee can act alone or only as one member of a committee.
  • Keep committee meetings, records, assets, court supervision, and day-to-day administration outside Virginia if that is the intended structure.
  • Revisit the analysis before expanding a Virginia co-trustee's powers.

Common questions

Q: Did the trusts own Virginia property?
A: No.

Q: Could the Virginia co-trustee act alone?
A: No. His authority was limited to committee participation.

Q: Where would the committee meet?
A: In the state where the trusts were administered.

Citations and references

  • Va. Code §§ 58.1-302 and 58.1-381.
  • 23 VAC 10-115-10.
  • P.D. 02-101, P.D. 07-164, and P.D. 13-18.

Subject

Estates and Trusts

Source

Original ruling text

April 2, 2014

Re: Ruling Request: Fiduciary Income Tax

Dear *:

This will respond to your letter in which you request a nexus ruling for fiduciary income tax purposes.

FACTS

Three Generation-Skipping Trusts (GSTs) were established outside Virginia by grantors who never resided in Virginia. None of the Trusts own property in Virginia. The Trusts are being administered in * (State A) by a corporate trustee (Co-Trustee 1). Co-Trustee 1 administers the day-to-day operations of the GSTs including portfolio management, tax filings and execution of distributions to beneficiaries.

A Virginia resident (Co-Trustee 2) has been appointed as a co-trustee. Co-Trustee 2 would join a committee that would set annual distributions permissible by the trust documents. Co-Trustee 2 has not yet accepted the appointment. Co-Trustee 2 asks whether the GSTs would be considered to be resident trusts and have nexus with Virginia for fiduciary income tax purposes if he accepts the appointment.

RULING

Virginia Code § 58.1-381 provides that all resident trusts which are required to file a federal income tax return or that have any Virginia taxable income must file an income tax return in Virginia. A "resident trust" is defined in Va. Code § 58.1-302 includes:

  1. An estate of a decedent who was domiciled in Virginia at the time of their death;

  2. A trust created by will of a decedent who was domiciled in Virginia at the time of their death;

  3. A trust created by or consisting of property of a person domiciled in Virginia; or

  4. A trust or estate that is administered in Virginia.

The GSTs do not fit within the first two definitions of a resident trust. Accordingly, the relevant issue would be whether they are being administered in Virginia. Title 23 of the Virginia Administrative Code (VAC) 10-115-10 provides that a trust is being administered in the Commonwealth if its "assets are located in Virginia, its fiduciary is a resident of Virginia, or it is under the supervision of a Virginia court." Under this general rule, a trust would be considered to be administered in Virginia if its trustee is a resident of Virginia.

In Public Document (P.D.) 02-101 (6/24/2002), the Department ruled that when a committee administers a trust and the members of such committee cannot exercise control of the trust individually, membership in the committee by a Virginia resident or residents would not make the trust a "resident trust" for Virginia fiduciary income tax purposes, so long as the committee does not operate in Virginia or is not controlled in Virginia. See also P.D. 07-164 (10/10/2007) and P.D. 13-18 (2/05/2013).

According to the request, Co-Trustee 2 is a resident of Virginia who would not make decisions regarding the GSTs individually. Instead, his authority would be limited to participating in committee meetings in State A for the purpose of setting distribution amounts from the GSTs. Under these circumstances, the GSTs would not be administered in Virginia and would not be considered resident trusts for fiduciary income tax purposes. Accordingly, the GSTs would not be required to file Virginia fiduciary income tax returns.

This ruling is based on the facts presented as summarized above. Any change in facts or the introduction of new facts may lead to a different result.

The Code of Virginia sections, regulation and public documents cited are available online at www.tax.virginia.gov in the Laws, Rules & Decisions section of the Department's website. If you have additional questions, please contact * in the Office of Tax Policy, Appeals and Rulings Division, at ***.

Sincerely,

Craig M. Burns

Tax Commissioner

AR/1-5565832748.o

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2014 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Virginia tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.