What result is verifiable from the published order in Timothy S. Hunt v. Commonwealth of Virginia?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 2014. Ezel answers yours, under current Virginia tax law, with citations.
Subject
Court Case: Timothy S. Hunt v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Plain-English summary
The Norfolk Circuit Court sustained the Commonwealth's demurrer because sovereign immunity prevented the court from hearing Timothy S. Hunt's requested declaratory-judgment action. The court denied leave to amend and dismissed the declaratory-judgment case with prejudice.
The published order contains no description of the underlying tax dispute or the arguments beyond sovereign immunity. No substantive tax holding can be verified from this source.
What this means for you
- The order resolves this declaratory-judgment action on sovereign-immunity grounds.
- Dismissal with prejudice prevented refiling that declaratory-judgment claim in the same form.
- The document does not establish any rule about the underlying individual-income-tax issue.
- This is a trial-court order concerning the named parties, not a statewide appellate precedent.
Citations and references
- Norfolk Circuit Court, Case No. CL14002034-00, order entered August 22, 2014.
Source
- Landing page: Virginia Laws, Rules & Decisions
- Ruling: P.D. 14-175
Original ruling text
VIRGINIA:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF NORFOLK
TIMOTHY S. HUNT )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Case No. CL14002034-00
)
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA )
)
Defendant. )
ORDER
THIS CAUSE came before the Court on August 22, 2014, on the Defendant’s Demurrer, and the matter having been fully presented and argued to the court and submitted for its decision, and the Court being fully advised; and
IT APPEARING to the Court after hearing the arguments of counsel and reviewing the briefs submitted by counsel, that the Commonwealth’s sovereign immunity prevents this Court from entertaining a Declaratory Judgment action as requested in the Complaint, the Court finds that the Demurrer should be SUSTAINED.
It is therefore ADJUDGED, ORDERED, AND DECREED that the Defendant’s Demurrer is SUSTAINED without leave to amend. It is further ADJUDGED ORDERED and DECREED that this case be DISMISSED with prejudice as to the filing of such Declaratory Judgment. The Clerk is requested to send certified copies of this order to counsel of record.
ENTERED this 22 nd day of August, 2014
Circuit Court Judge
Charles E. Poston, Judge
COPY TESTE:
GEORGE E. SCHAEFER, CLERK
NORFOLK CIRCUIT COURT
BY: Brittany Hopper, Deputy Clerk
Authorized to sign on behalf
Of George E. Schaefer
Date : August 22, 2014
I ASK FOR THIS:
Elizabeth Bushnell Myers (VSB #80739)
Assistant Attorney General
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA
900 East Main Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219
Telephone: (804) 786-9516
Facsimile: (804) 692-1647
Email: [email protected]
Counsel for Defendant
SEEN AND OBJECTED TO for the reasons
State on the record.
Robert V. Roussos, Esq.
ROUSSOS, LASSITER, FLAZER & BARNHARD, P.L.C.
580 E. Main Street, Ste. 300
Norfolk, Virginia 23510
(757) 622-9005
Counsel for Plaintiff
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read a 2014 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Virginia tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.