🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
VA P.D. 14-125 Individual Income Tax 2014-07-28

Could buyers of transferred Virginia Land Preservation Tax Credits protect a refund claim while litigation challenged the Department's easement valuation?

Short answer: Potentially. Virginia did not reverse the Department's lower conservation-easement valuation. Because litigation was pending over that valuation, the taxpayers could consider a protective claim under Va. Code § 58.1-1824 for income tax paid; a final court-ordered credit adjustment would produce a refund.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2014. Ezel answers yours, under current Virginia tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2014
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official published Virginia Tax Commissioner determination on two taxpayers' transferred 2009 Land Preservation Tax Credits. It did not resolve the underlying conservation-easement valuation dispute; it identified a possible protective-claim procedure while separate litigation was pending. Different litigation outcomes, claim timing, or credit facts can change the result. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Subject

Protective claim pending conservation-easement valuation litigation

Plain-English summary

Virginia did not overturn the Department's reduced conservation-easement valuation, but it said the transferred-credit buyers might protect a future refund while the valuation litigation remained pending.

Two LLCs donated conservation easements, registered Land Preservation Tax Credits using their appraisal, and transferred part of the credits to the taxpayers. The Department concluded that the easement was overvalued, relied on a third-party appraisal, reduced the credits, and assessed additional 2009 tax and interest against credit holders.

After P.D. 14-7 upheld the Department's valuation, litigation was filed challenging it. P.D. 14-125 said the taxpayers could potentially file a protective claim under Va. Code § 58.1-1824 for income tax paid. If final adjudication later changed the easement valuation and credit amount, the taxpayers would receive a refund reflecting that adjustment.

What this means for you

  • Buying a transferred credit does not insulate the buyer from a later Department valuation adjustment.
  • A protective claim can preserve a refund position while related valuation litigation is unresolved.
  • This ruling did not decide the lawsuit or promise a refund; the result depended on the final adjudication.

Citations and references

  • Va. Code § 58.1-1824.
  • P.D. 14-7 (January 21, 2014), discussed in the ruling.

Source

Original ruling text

July 28, 2014

Re: § 58.1-1821 Application: Individual Income Tax

Dear *:

This will reply to your letter in which you seek correction of an individual income tax assessment issued to * (the "Taxpayers") for the taxable year ended December 31, 2009.

FACTS

In December 2008, two Virginia limited liability companies, * (VLLC1) and *** (VLLC2), conveyed a conservation easement on two adjacent parcels of land to a donee. Pursuant to the conveyance of the easement, VLLC1 and VLLC2 registered their donation with the Department for purposes of the Land Preservation Tax Credit (the "Credit"). Subsequently, VLLC1 and VLLC2 transferred a portion of the Credit to the Taxpayers based on an appraisal submitted with the registration. The Taxpayers claimed the Credit on their 2009 Virginia individual income tax return.

Under examination, the Department determined that the appraisal overvalued the easement and commissioned an appraisal from a third party appraiser. Based on this appraisal, the Credit was revalued and assessments were issued to the individuals that received the transferred Credit. As a result, additional tax and interest was assessed against the Credit holders, including the Taxpayers, for the 2009 taxable year.

In April 2012, VLLC1 and VLLC2 appealed the revaluation of the credit. The

Taxpayers appealed the assessment issued to them, referencing the appeal filed by VLLC1 and VLLC2.

DETERMINATION

The Department issued Public Document (P.D.) 14-7 (1/21/2014) upholding the Department's valuation of the easement on the basis that the third party appraisal commissioned by the Department most accurately valued the easement. Subsequent to the issuance of P.D. 14-7, Valley Medical and Chapman Brothers v. Virginia Department of Taxation , Circuit Court County of Loudoun, Case No. 86252, was filed challenging the valuation of the easement.

Pending a decision in the aforementioned litigation, the Taxpayers may be able to file a protective claim pursuant to Va. Code § 58.1-1824 with respect to any income tax paid. Any adjustment of the Credit resulting from the valuation of the easement in accordance with a final adjudication would result in a payment of a refund to the Taxpayers.

The Code of Virginia sections and public document cited are available on-line at www.tax.virginia.gov in the Laws, Rules and Decisions section of the Department's website. If you have any questions about this response, you may contact * in the Office of Tax Policy, Appeals and Rulings, at ***.

Sincerely,

Craig M. Burns

Tax Commissioner

AR/1-5007125473.B

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2014 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Virginia tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.