🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
VA P.D. 13-132 Retail Sales and Use Tax 2013-07-08

Did using a customer's nine-digit FEIN instead of Virginia's full registration number invalidate an otherwise complete Form ST-10?

Short answer: No. Virginia accepted the Form ST-10 because it was correct in every other respect and the Department's 15-digit registration number included the customer's nine-digit FEIN. Certificates obtained after an audit begins are not treated as having been accepted in good faith and receive greater scrutiny, but this certificate passed that review. The Department ordered the paid audit revised and directed a refund of the overpaid portion with interest.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2013. Ezel answers yours, under current Virginia tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2013
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Virginia Tax Commissioner determination on one medicine-and-medical-supplies retailer's July 2007-June 2010 audit. The result depended on a resale certificate that was otherwise complete and on the relationship between the FEIN and Virginia's registration number; it does not excuse other omissions or defects. Different certificates, customer uses, audit timing, tax periods, or later law can change the result, and another taxpayer should not assume it controls. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Virginia accepted an otherwise complete resale certificate that listed the customer's FEIN rather than the full Virginia registration number. The taxpayer sold medicine and medical supplies. Its audit had disallowed exempt sales supported by invalid certificates, but replacement certificates led to adjustments, and the taxpayer sought another revision for one customer.

Virginia emphasized that exemption certificates obtained only after an audit begins are not considered accepted in good faith at the time of sale. They receive closer review and are allowed only when complete, valid, and confirmed as proper for the specific audited transaction.

The disputed Form ST-10 used the customer's nine-digit FEIN in the registration-number field. Virginia's newer 15-digit registration number included the FEIN, and no other deficiency appeared on the certificate. The Commissioner therefore accepted it and ordered another audit adjustment.

Because the assessment had already been paid, the ruling directed a refund of the resulting overpayment with interest.

What this means for you

  • Obtain complete exemption certificates when the sale occurs; replacements produced during audit face greater scrutiny.
  • An FEIN did not invalidate this certificate because the form was otherwise correct and the Virginia number incorporated that FEIN.
  • The ruling does not excuse missing signatures, addresses, purchase descriptions, or other facial defects.
  • Tie each replacement certificate to the specific customer and audited transaction.

Common questions

Q: Is an FEIN always enough on Form ST-10?
A: The ruling accepted it only because the certificate was otherwise complete and Virginia's registration number incorporated the FEIN.

Q: Are certificates obtained after audit automatically rejected?
A: No, but they are not treated as having been accepted in good faith and are reviewed more closely.

Q: What happened to the paid assessment?
A: Virginia ordered the audit revised and the overpaid portion refunded with interest.

Q: Did the ruling allow other certificate defects?
A: No. It repeatedly relied on the absence of any other deficiency.

Citations and references

  • Va. Code §§ 58.1-15, 58.1-603, and 58.1-623 A-B.
  • 23 VAC 10-210-280 A.
  • Virginia Public Documents 98-29, 11-8, and 12-155.

Subject

Good faith acceptance of the resale certificate/ ST-10

Source

Original ruling text

July 8, 2013

Re: § 58.1-1821 Application: Retail Sales and Use Tax

Dear *:

This will reply to your letter in which you seek correction of the retail sales and use tax assessment issued to * (the "Taxpayer") for the period July 2007 through June 2010. I note that the Department's assessment has been paid.

FACTS

The Taxpayer is a retailer making sales of medicine and medical supplies. The Department's audit disclosed that the Taxpayer made exempt sales and accepted exemption certificates that were deemed to be invalid. The Taxpayer secured valid replacement certificates and the Department's audit was adjusted. The Taxpayer has also submitted corrected exemption certificates for one customer in its protest and seeks a further revision of the Department's assessment.

DETERMINATION

Virginia Code § 58.1-603 imposes a tax upon every person who engages in the business of selling at retail or distributing tangible personal property in Virginia. Va. Code § 58.1-623 A states that all sales or leases are subject to the tax until the contrary is established. The burden of proving that a sale, distribution, lease, or storage of tangible personal property is not taxable is upon the dealer unless he takes from the taxpayer a certificate to the effect that the property is exempt under the Retail Sales and Use Tax Act in Title 58.1 of the Code of Virginia .

Title 23 of the Virginia Administrative Code 10-210-280 A interprets this statute and provides the following:

All sales, leases and rentals of tangible personal property are subject to the tax until the contrary is established. The burden of proving that the tax does not apply rests with the dealer unless he takes, in good faith from the purchaser or lessee, a certificate of exemption indicating that the property is exempt under the law. The certificate will remain in effect except upon notice from the Department of Taxation that it is no longer acceptable. However, a certificate that is incomplete, invalid, infirm or inconsistent on its face is never acceptable, either before after notice.

Further, subsection B of Va. Code § 58.1-623 provides that “[s]uch certificate shall be signed by and bear the name and address of the taxpayer; shall indicate the number of the certificate of registration, if any, issued to the taxpayer; shall indicate the general character of the tangible personal property sold . . . or to be sold . . . in such form as the Tax Commissioner may prescribe.”

The Tax Commissioner previously ruled in Public Document (P.D.) 98-29 (2/20/98) that the absence of an exemption certificate at the time of a sales transaction or the acceptance of an incomplete or invalid exemption certificate indicates that the certificate was never accepted in good faith. Thus, exemption certificates obtained after the start of an audit cannot be accepted "in good faith" and as a result are subject to greater review by the Department. Accordingly, such certificates are acceptable only if they are complete and valid and the Department is able to confirm that a customer's use of the certificate was valid and proper for a specific transaction identified during the Department's audit.

The Taxpayer has submitted a customer's exemption certificate that is correct in all respects with the exception that the customer has inserted its 9-digit federal identification number (FEIN) in the certificate of registration number space rather than the actual 15-digit registration number issued by the Department. In the second exemption certificate, the customer's certificate was correct in all respects with the exception that the customer inserted in the certificate of registration number space a 10-digit registration number that was previously issued by the Department when a dealer is registered for the collection and reporting of the retail sales and use tax. In 2004 the Department began issuing the 15-digit registration number, which is inclusive of the FEIN, in lieu of the previous 10-digit registration number.

The Department's ST-10 resale exemption certificate limits the exempt purchase of tangible personal property to purchases for resale or for other specific classes of tangible personal property. In this instance, the resale exemption certificate listing the FEIN is acceptable. In P.D. 12-155 (10/4/12) reference was made to P.D. 11-8 (1/20/11) in which, for the purpose of that response, the use of the FEIN was not appropriate for use on the Form ST-10 since the certificate was not otherwise complete and a specific 10-digit registration number was in use for the audit period at issue in that response. The Tax Commissioner advised that unlike the situation in P.D. 11-8 the Virginia certificate of registration number includes the FEIN as a part of the registration number. The Tax Commissioner concluded that the use of the FEIN on the resale certificate of exemption Form ST-10 would not invalidate the good faith acceptance of the resale certificate with the provision that no other deficiencies are found on the resale exemption certificate. Accordingly, in this instance, the use of the FEIN is acceptable since the resale certificate was correct in every other manner. Accordingly, I find cause for adjusting the Department's assessment.

CONCLUSION

The appropriate field audit staff will revise the audit in accordance with this determination. Because the bills are paid in full, a refund of the overpaid portion will be issued to the Taxpayer as soon as practical. The refund will include interest computed in accordance with Va. Code § 58.1-15.

The Code of Virginia sections, regulation and public documents cited are available on-line in the Laws, Rules and Decisions section of the Department's website located at www.tax.virginia.gov . If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact * in the Department's Office of Tax Policy, Appeals and Rulings, at ***.

Sincerely,

Craig M. Burns

Tax Commissioner

AR/1-5283287497.Q

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2013 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Virginia tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.