🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
VA P.D. 13-105 BPOL Tax Communications Sales and Use Tax 2013-06-14

Could a telecommunications provider exclude its local BPOL tax from the sales price subject to Virginia communications sales tax?

Short answer: No. BPOL tax is imposed for the privilege of doing business in a locality; it is not a tax on the customer's purchase, sale, use, or consumption of communications service, and it is not a government fee that must be added to the service price. It therefore remained a provider expense included in the communications-services sales price. Virginia upheld the paid assessment and denied a refund.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2013. Ezel answers yours, under current Virginia tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2013
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Virginia Tax Commissioner determination on one telecommunications provider's January 2007-March 2011 audit. The result depended on the statutory communications-services sales-price definition and the character of BPOL tax as a local privilege-of-business tax rather than a required customer transaction charge. Different charges, invoicing, taxes, tax periods, or later law can change the result; another provider should not assume it controls. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Virginia included BPOL tax in the sales price subject to communications sales and use tax. The telecommunications provider argued that separately stated government taxes and fees were excluded.

The communications-tax base included the total amount charged for the right to use communications services and could not be reduced by provider expenses such as property tax, purchased-service sales tax, net-income taxes, or universal-service fees.

BPOL tax was imposed on the provider for the privilege of doing business in the locality. It was not imposed on the customer's communications purchase and was not a government assessment required to be added to the customer's price.

Virginia therefore upheld the paid audit assessment and denied a refund.

What this means for you

  • Distinguish provider operating taxes from taxes legally imposed on the customer transaction.
  • Separately stating a provider expense does not necessarily remove it from the communications-tax base.
  • The exclusion applies only to taxes or required fees fitting the statutory wording.

Common questions

Q: Is BPOL tax imposed on the customer purchase?
A: No. It is imposed on the business for the privilege of operating in the locality.

Q: Did separate billing exclude it?
A: No. Its legal character, not merely invoice presentation, controlled.

Q: What was the result?
A: The assessment was upheld and no refund was due.

Citations and references

  • Va. Code §§ 58.1-647 and 58.1-648 B.
  • Virginia Public Document 11-145.

Subject

Inclusion of BPOL tax in the taxable base or sales price

Source

Original ruling text

June 14, 2013

Re: § 58.1-1821 Application: Communications Sales and Use Tax

Dear *:

This is in response to your letter submitted on behalf of * (the "Taxpayer) in which you seek correction of the communications sales and use tax assessment issued for the period January 2007 through March 2011. I apologize for the delay in responding to your letter.

FACTS

The Taxpayer is a provider of telecommunications services. The Taxpayer contests the inclusion of the BPOL tax in the taxable base or sales price upon which the assessment was computed in the audit. Relying on Va. Code § 58.1-648, the Taxpayer maintains that the BPOL tax is specifically exempted from inclusion in the sales price. The Taxpayer has paid the assessment in full.

DETERMINATION

Pursuant to Va. Code § 58.1-647, sales price is defined as:

The total amount charged in money or other consideration by a communications services provider for the sale of the right or privilege of using communications services in the Commonwealth, including any property or other services that are part of the sale. The sales price of communications services shall not be reduced by any separately identified components of the charge that constitute expenses of the communications services provider, including but not limited to, sales tax on goods or services purchased by the communications services provider, property taxes, taxes measured by net income, and universal-service fund fees. [Emphasis added.]

Virginia Code § 58.1-648 B provides, in pertinent part:

The sales price on which the tax is levied shall not include charges for: (i) an excise, sales or similar tax levied by the United States or any state or local government on the purchase, sale, use or consumption of any communications service that is permitted or required to be added to the sales price of such service, if the tax is stated separately; (ii) a fee or assessment levied by the United States or any state or local government, including but not limited to, regulatory fees and emergency telephone surcharges, that is required to be added to the price of service if the fee or assessment is separately stated.

The BPOL tax is imposed on businesses and professionals for the privilege of doing business in a locality. See, Public Document 11-145 (8/5/11). The BPOL tax is not a tax levied by a government entity on the purchase, sale, use or consumption of communications services, nor is it a fee or assessment levied by a government entity that is required to be added to the price of the service. The BPOL tax is not the type of tax or fee considered in Va. Code § 58.1-648 B that would be excluded from the sales price, as defined in Va. Code § 58.1-647. Accordingly, the inclusion of the BPOL tax in the sales price upon which the audit assessment was computed is correct. The assessment is correct as issued, and the Taxpayer is not due a refund.

The Code of Virginia sections and public document cited are available on-line at www.tax.virginia.gov in the Tax Policy Library section of the Department's web site. If you have any questions about this response, you may contact * in the Department's Office of Tax Policy, Appeals and Rulings, at ***.

Sincerely,

Craig M. Burns

Tax Commissioner

AR/1-4851616210.P

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2013 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Virginia tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.