🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
UT PLR 00-027 Sales & Use Tax 2001-01-26

Is a commuter shuttle company's temporary service transporting employees and guests between different 2002 Winter Olympics venues exempt from Utah sales tax?

Short answer: Yes, with a county-by-county limitation. A regular commuter shuttle company that's already an SIC Code 4111 'establishment' (mass transit over regular routes, confined to a municipality/contiguous municipalities/suburban area, or serving airports/rail terminals) doesn't lose that classification just because it temporarily provides different, non-qualifying service (like venue-to-venue Olympic transport) for a limited three-week period — a temporary deviation from its ordinary business doesn't disqualify the company as an SIC 4111 establishment, so the § 59-12-104(16)(b)(ii) exemption can still apply to its transportation generally, including the temporary Olympic shuttle runs. But the exemption itself has its own separate requirement: the transportation must originate AND terminate within a county of the first, second, or third class (based on population under § 17-50-501). Applied here, Olympic shuttle service between the qualifying counties was tax-exempt, but any run originating or terminating in the one fourth-class county involved was not — though a route that merely passed through the fourth-class county as an interim stop, while still starting and ending in a qualifying county, remained exempt.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2001. Ezel answers yours, under current Utah tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2001
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Utah State Tax Commission private letter ruling (governed by Utah Admin. Code R861-1A-34). It states the Commission's interpretation only as to the specific taxpayer and facts to which it was issued; taxpayer-identifying details have been redacted. Another taxpayer cannot rely on it as binding, and any weight it carries in a later appeal depends on how closely that taxpayer's facts match. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Utah tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A shuttle bus company, founded about a year earlier to run commuter shuttles between employer worksites and the Utah Transportation Authority's TRAX rail depots (every 15 minutes during commuting hours), asked whether its charges would be exempt from Utah sales tax under § 59-12-104(16) for a special three-week engagement: shuttling employees, guests, and customers of various Olympic business sponsors between 2002 Winter Olympics venues spread across five counties, on a scheduled but day-to-day varying route.

The Commission first ruled out two exemptions that didn't fit: the Olympic Organizing Committee's own charitable-institution exemption (§ 59-12-104(8)(b)) didn't apply because the Committee wasn't the one contracting for this transportation, and the employer-employee commute exemption (§ 59-12-104(46)) didn't apply because Olympic venues aren't a sponsor's employee's "primary place of business," and the shuttle would carry non-employees too (guests, customers).

The right exemption was § 59-12-104(16)(b)(ii), which exempts intrastate passenger transportation furnished by an establishment described under SIC Code 4111 — mass transit over regular routes/schedules confined to a municipality or its suburbs, or transport to/from/between airports and rail terminals — but only where the transportation both originates and terminates in a county of the first, second, or third class (population-based classification under § 17-50-501).

The Commission agreed the shuttle company's regular TRAX-depot business already qualified it as an SIC 4111 establishment (bus transport to and from a rail terminal over regular routes). The harder question was the Olympic engagement itself: shuttling passengers directly between spread-out Olympic venues — not to or from an airport/rail terminal, and arguably not "confined to a municipality... or its suburban areas" given the distances — might not independently qualify as SIC 4111 service. But the Commission held that didn't matter: a temporary deviation from a company's ordinary course of business (like a three-week Olympics contract) doesn't strip it of its SIC 4111 establishment status, as long as the company remains "primarily engaged" in its normal qualifying transit business overall. So the exemption could still reach the Olympic shuttle runs, even though those specific runs, viewed in isolation, might not independently fit the SIC 4111 description.

That still left the separate county-classification requirement to check. The Olympic venues spanned five counties; four were first/second/third class (qualifying), but one was fourth class (non-qualifying). The result: shuttle service that originated and terminated in one of the qualifying counties was tax-exempt — even if it passed through the fourth-class county as an interim stop along the way — but any run that started or ended in the fourth-class county was taxable.

What this means for you

Regularly licensed SIC 4111 transit/shuttle companies taking on temporary special-event contracts

A short-term deviation into different transportation work (a festival, a convention, a major sporting event) doesn't automatically strip your company of its SIC 4111 status or the associated sales tax exemption, as long as your business remains primarily engaged in your normal qualifying transit service. But check the exemption's separate origin/destination county-class requirement route by route — it applies independently of your overall SIC classification.

Event organizers and sponsors contracting for attendee/guest transportation

Confirm both halves of the test with your transportation vendor: (1) is the vendor genuinely an SIC 4111 establishment in its regular business, and (2) does each specific route both start and end in a first, second, or third class county. A route that dips into a smaller county only as a stop along the way, without starting or ending there, can still be exempt.

Accountants advising transportation companies on multi-service contracts

Track exemption eligibility at the route level for county classification, but at the company level for the SIC 4111 "establishment" test — these are two distinct, independently applied requirements under § 59-12-104(16)(b)(ii).

Common questions

Q: Does taking on a temporary, different kind of transportation contract disqualify a shuttle company from its usual sales tax exemption?
A: No, as long as the company remains primarily engaged in its normal SIC 4111-qualifying transit business — a temporary deviation doesn't strip the exemption from its overall operations.

Q: Is transportation between event venues in different counties always exempt?
A: Only if the specific route both originates and terminates in a county of the first, second, or third class. A route starting or ending in a lower-class county is taxable, even if the company is otherwise SIC 4111-qualified.

Q: Is a route that passes through a non-qualifying county still exempt?
A: Yes, if it merely passes through as an interim stop while actually originating and terminating in qualifying counties.

Q: Why didn't the employer-employee transportation exemption apply here?
A: Because Olympic venues aren't a sponsor's employees' "primary place of business," and the shuttle also carried non-employees (guests and customers), taking it outside that narrower exemption.

Q: Does this ruling apply to my transportation company's special-event contracts?
A: Not automatically, and the Commission explicitly noted its opinion is based on the specific facts described and could differ on different facts. This is a private letter ruling binding only on the Commission as to this taxpayer's specific facts. It can't be relied on as binding by anyone else, though it may carry weight if your facts closely match.

Citations and references

Statutes and rules:

  • Utah Code Ann. § 59-12-104(16)(b)(ii) (intrastate passenger transportation exemption for SIC Code 4111 establishments, origin/destination in first-third class counties)
  • Utah Code Ann. § 59-12-104(8)(b) (charitable institution exemption — not applicable)
  • Utah Code Ann. § 59-12-104(46) (employer-employee primary-place-of-business transportation exemption — not applicable)
  • Utah Code Ann. § 17-50-501 (county population-based classification)

Source

Original ruling text

REQUEST
LETTER

00-027

Response 1/26/01

Dear,

I would like your opinion on
sales tax exemption for SIC Code 4111 pertaining to the following:

Olympic Service. A company contracts with State Shuttle Service
to provide transportation for the entire 3 week Olympic period to provide
transportation for their employees.
Transportation will be on a scheduled route from event to event but will
not be the same route every day.

I look forward to your
response.

Sincerely yours,

RESPONSE
LETTER

January
26, 2001

RE: Sales Tax Exemption Under Section 59-12-104(16)

Dear Mr,

The
Utah State Tax Commission has received your request for an advisory opinion
concerning an exemption from sales tax under Utah Code Ann. '59-12-104(16).
In your request letter, you indicated that State Shuttle Services may be
retained to transport passengers to various Olympic venues over a three week
period. By telephone, you stated that
you would be contracting with various Olympic business sponsors to transport
their employees, guests, and customers between Olympic venues located in
County, County , County, County, and
County.

Exemptions. Before discussing
your request specific to Section 59-12-104(16), we note that there are two
other exemptions provisions which do not apply to your situation. As these proposed transactions would not
involve the City Organizing Committee, that organization=s sales tax
exemption as a charitable institution, as provided in Section 59-12-104(8)(b),
does not apply. These transactions
would also not qualify for the Section 59-12-104(46) sales tax exemption for
the transportation of an employer=s
employee to or from the employee=s
primary place of business. The Olympic
venues are not a sponsor=s employee=s Aprimary place of business,@ and persons other than employees would be
transported, as well.

However,
Section 59-12-104(16)(b)(ii) does apply to your circumstances, with
limitations. That section exempts from
sales tax Aintrastate movements of . . . passengers . . .
transported by an establishment described in SIC Code 4111 of the 1987 Standard
Industrial Classification Manual . . . , if the transportation originates and
terminates within a county of the first, second, or third class.@

The
1987 Standard Industrial Classification Manual defines SIC Code 4111 as:

Establishments
primarily engaged in furnishing local and suburban mass passenger
transportation over regular routes and on regular schedules, with operations
confined principally to a municipality, contiguous municipalities, or a
municipality and its suburban areas.
Also included in this industry are establishments primarily engaged in
furnishing passenger transportation by automobile, bus, or rail, to, from, or
between airports or rail terminals, over regular routes, and those providing
bus and rail commuter services.

In
essence, SIC Code 4111 and Section 59-12-104(16)(b)(ii) provide the following
requirements for this sales tax exemption:

(1) The transportation company must be an
establishment Aprimarily engaged@ in
furnishing:

(a) mass passenger transportation over regular
routes and on regular schedules with operations confined to a municipality, contiguous
municipalities, or a municipality and its suburban areas;

or

(b) passenger transportation by automobile,
bus, or rail, to, from, or between airports or rail terminals, over regular
routes, and those providing bus and rail commuter services;

and

(2) The transportation must originate and
terminate within a county of the first, second, or third class.

SIC
Code 4111 Establishment Requirement
. By telephone, you stated that State Shuttle
Services was founded approximately one year ago to provide, by shuttle bus,
commuter transit service to and from the Utah Transportation Authority=s TRAX depots.
You contract with large employers to shuttle their employees between
their work locations and the TRAX depots, with shuttles running every 15
minutes during normal commuting times.
You have not collected sales tax on your charges for these services,
believing that your company is an establishment described in SIC Code 4111. Because your company furnishes passenger
transportation by bus to and from rail terminals over regular routes, we agree
that it is an establishment described in SIC Code 4111.

However,
during the three week Olympic period, you would be providing shuttle service
between Olympic venues located in County, County, County, County, and County.
This service would not involve transportation to an airport or rail
terminal. Also, as these venues are
relatively far apart, there is a question of whether this non-airport and
non-rail terminal transportation service would be Aconfined to a municipality, contiguous municipalities,
or a municipality and its suburban areas,@ as
required in SIC Code 4111. Accordingly,
this temporary service between Olympic venues may not constitute a service
described under SIC Code 4111.

Nevertheless,
even if your transportation service between Olympic venues is not described
under SIC Code 4111, this temporary service would not disqualify State
Shuttle Services from being classified as an SIC Code 4111 establishment. So long as Utah Shuttle Services is Aprimarily engaged@ in
furnishing transportation by bus to and from TRAX depots over regular routes, a
temporary deviation from the ordinary course of business, such as the contract
to provide transportation services to Olympic venues during the Olympics, will
not by itself create a requirement that your company collect sales tax on such
services. State Shuttle Services would
still be classified as a SIC Code 4111 establishment and the Section
59-12-104(16) sales tax exemption may still apply on all its transportation,
even if State Shuttle Services, for this three week period, provides services
that are not described in SIC Code 4111.

First,
Second, or Third Class County
. Finally,
Section 59-12-104(16)(b)(ii) adds that the transportation services must Aoriginate and terminate within a county of the first,
second, or third class.@ The Aclass@ of a county is
based on population. Utah Code Ann. '17-50-501 specifies that a county having a population
of more than 18,000 will, at a minimum, be a county of the third class. Included is a list of Utah=s 29 counties that shows the population and Aclass@ of each
county.

Your
temporary Olympic shuttle service would involve venues located in County, County, County, County, and County. Only County, which is of the fourth class,
does not qualify here. Accordingly,
your company, as an SIC Code 4111 establishment, may provide tax-free temporary
Olympic shuttle service that originates and terminates in County,
County, Weber County, or County, but
not any shuttle service that originates or terminates in
County. However, shuttle service that
includes County as an interim stop, but originates and terminates in one of the
other counties would still be tax-exempt.

This
opinion is based on the facts described above.
Should the actual facts be different, our opinion might also be
different. Please contact us if you
have any other questions.

For
the Commission,

Marc
B. Johnson

Commissioner

MBJ/KC

00-027

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2001 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Utah tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.