πŸ§ͺ TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
TX 9811965L Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1998-11-05

A company lets customers come to its office to hold video conferences using its own equipment and phone lines, billing them for facility use plus re-billed long-distance charges. Is this equipment rental plus a telecom pass-through, or something else entirely for tax purposes -- and can the company buy its own phone service tax-free?

Short answer: The company isn't renting equipment and separately re-billing phone charges -- it's providing a single taxable TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE, and the ENTIRE charge to customers (facility/equipment use plus re-billed long-distance) is subject to sales tax. The company may buy the underlying phone service it uses to provide video conferencing tax-free from its own supplier by issuing a resale certificate. NOTE: the ruling as originally written also said the total charge was subject to the Telecommunications Infrastructure Fund (TIF) assessment -- that assessment was fully repealed effective September 1, 2008 (per STAR document 200810367L), so that specific portion of this 1998 answer no longer reflects current law, even though it isn't individually flagged as superseded on this document.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1998. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1998
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. NOTE: this letter's reference to the Telecommunications Infrastructure Fund (TIF) assessment is now OBSOLETE: the TIF assessment was repealed effective September 1, 2008 (House Bill 735, 80th Legislature); this document is not individually flagged as superseded on STAR, but the TIF portion of its answer no longer reflects current law. The sales-tax-on-telecommunications-service holding is not affected by the TIF repeal. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

This document is also indexed as a related TIF (Telecommunications Infrastructure Fund) document at STAR 9811966L.

A company set up office space with video-conferencing equipment and telephone lines, letting customers come in and hold video conferences using the company's own gear and phone lines. The company billed customers both for using its facility/equipment and for the long-distance telephone charges it re-billed on their behalf. It asked the Comptroller four questions: is the facility/equipment charge taxable, can it buy the equipment tax-free if so, are the re-billed phone charges taxable, and do any state excise taxes apply to those re-billed charges?

The Comptroller reframed the whole arrangement: this isn't equipment rental plus a separate telephone pass-through charge β€” it's a single taxable telecommunications service. As a result, the ENTIRE charge the company bills its customers (both the facility/equipment portion and the re-billed long-distance portion) is subject to sales tax. On the flip side, because the company is now classified as a telecommunications service provider rather than an equipment renter, it can buy the underlying telephone service it uses to deliver video conferencing tax-free from its own supplier, by giving that supplier a resale certificate.

Note on obsolete TIF language: the original 1998 letter also said the total charge was subject to the Telecommunications Infrastructure Fund (TIF) assessment. That assessment β€” a fee on telecommunications providers, not a sales tax β€” was fully repealed effective September 1, 2008. This document isn't individually flagged as superseded on STAR, but that specific part of its answer no longer reflects current law; the sales-tax holding on the video-conferencing charge itself is unaffected by the TIF repeal.

What this means for you

Video-conferencing, meeting-room, or similar facility-plus-connectivity businesses

If your business model bundles your own equipment with telecom connectivity you provide to customers on-site, the Comptroller may treat the whole package as a single taxable telecommunications service rather than splitting it into a nontaxable equipment rental plus a separately-taxed phone pass-through β€” tax the full charge accordingly.

Businesses reselling telecom connectivity as part of a bundled service

Being classified as a telecommunications service provider (rather than an equipment renter) has an upside: you can buy the underlying phone/connectivity service you resell to customers tax-free via resale certificate.

Common questions

Q: If I bundle my own equipment with phone/connectivity access I bill separately, is that equipment rental or a telecom service?
A: Per this letter, the Comptroller can treat the whole bundle as a single taxable telecommunications service, taxing the full charge rather than splitting equipment rental from a phone pass-through.

Q: Is the Telecommunications Infrastructure Fund assessment mentioned in this 1998 letter still in effect?
A: No β€” it was repealed effective September 1, 2008, so that portion of this letter's answer is now obsolete even though the document isn't formally flagged as superseded.

Citations and references

Rules referenced (TIF portion now obsolete):

  • 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rule 3.344 (Telecommunications Services)
  • 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rule 3.1101 (Telecommunications Infrastructure Fund assessment β€” repealed 2008)

Source

Original ruling text

Note: This document is also indexed as a TIF document at STAR 9811966L.

November 5, 1998




Dear **:

Thank you for your recent letter which is restated in part with response below.

Re: Sales tax on Video Conferencing

FACTS:
Company X has office space in which it has installed video conferencing
equipment and telephone lines. Customers will come to Company X's location and
hold video conferences using Company X's equipment and telephone lines. Company
X will bill customers for use of its facilities and also for telephone
long-distance charges.

Will charges for use of the facilities and equipment be subject to sales tax?
If equipment rental is subject to sales tax, can Company X buy the equipment
tax-free?
Will re-billed telephone charges be subject to sales tax?
Will re-billed telephone charges be subject to any state excise taxes?

Response: Company X appears to be providing a taxable telecommunications
service rather than renting equipment and rebilling for telephone charges. The
total charge made by Company X to its customers is subject to both sales tax
and the Telecommunications Infrastructure Fund assessment. Company X may
purchase the telephone service that it uses to provide the video conferencing
tax free by giving its supplier a resale certificate in lieu of sales tax.

Under separate cover, I am faxing you a copy of Rule 3.344 regarding
telecommunications services and Rule 3.1101 regarding the Telecommunications
Infrastructure Fund assessment.

This opinion is rendered based on the facts presented. If there are additional
or different facts, the opinion may change.

You may call me toll free at 1-800-531-5441, ext. 3-4680. The direct line is
512/463-4680. You may also write to Tax Policy, Comptroller of Public
Accounts. The email address is .

Sincerely,

Al Van Allen
Tax Policy Division

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1998 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.