πŸ§ͺ TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
TX 9808722L Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1998-08-06

When a company provides compressors to customers along with transportation, installation, and maintenance, is that a taxable rental of equipment or a nontaxable service?

Short answer: A taxable equipment RENTAL, not a nontaxable service -- based on who bears care, custody, and control. A taxpayer asked the Comptroller to review two vendors' contracts (COMPANY A and COMPANY B) to determine whether they're renting compressors or providing a compression service. After reviewing the actual contract terms, the Comptroller concluded both are RENTALS of tangible personal property, because care, custody, and control of the equipment transfers to the lessees -- evidenced by contract terms making the lessee responsible for transporting equipment from the lessor's yard (or unloading it, in COMPANY A's case), installing it, performing daily maintenance, and disconnecting/returning it at rental end (with the vendors only providing minor repairs and replacement parts). Sales tax is due on the full rental/lease amount AND any related service charges billed by COMPANY A and COMPANY B, unless the customer provides a valid resale or exemption certificate. IMPORTANT CURRENCY NOTE: this record carries the Comptroller's own alert that Rule 3.285 (Resale Certificates; Sales for Resale), which now governs care-custody-and-control analysis for taxable services, was amended 11/01/2017 -- roughly nineteen years after this letter -- so verify current guidance before relying on this letter's specific analysis today.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1998. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1998
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. CURRENCY ALERT carried in the letter's own STAR record: Rule 3.285 (Resale Certificates; Sales for Resale), which now governs care-custody-and-control analysis for taxable services, was amended 11/01/2017, roughly nineteen years after this 1998 letter issued, so verify this letter's specific rental-vs-service analysis against current Rule 3.285 guidance before relying on it today. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer asked the Comptroller to review contracts from two vendors (COMPANY A and COMPANY B) providing compressors, to determine whether each vendor is truly RENTING equipment or instead providing a nontaxable compression SERVICE β€” and what the sales tax implications are either way.

After reviewing the actual contract terms, the Comptroller concluded both are rentals of tangible personal property, because care, custody, and control of the compressor equipment transfers to the lessee (the customer), not the other way around. The specific contract terms driving that conclusion:

  • COMPANY B's contracts: the lessee is responsible for and bears the expense of transporting the equipment from the lessor's yard, installing it, performing daily maintenance, and β€” at the end of the rental β€” disconnecting and returning the equipment to the lessor's yard.
  • COMPANY A's contract: similar, except COMPANY A itself transports the equipment to the lessee's site (with the lessee responsible for unloading it).
  • Both vendors provide only minor repairs and replacement parts β€” not full operational responsibility.

Because the lessee bears the bulk of the transportation, installation, maintenance, and return burden (the hallmarks of "care, custody, and control"), these are rental transactions, not service contracts. Sales tax is due on the full rental/lease amount, plus any related service charges billed by COMPANY A and COMPANY B, unless the customer provides a valid resale or exemption certificate.

Currency note: this record's own STAR annotation flags that Rule 3.285 (Resale Certificates; Sales for Resale), the rule that now governs care-custody-and-control analysis for taxable services, was amended effective November 1, 2017 β€” roughly nineteen years after this letter. Verify this letter's specific rental-vs-service conclusion against current Rule 3.285 guidance before relying on it today.

What this means for you

Equipment rental companies (compressors, oilfield equipment, and similar)

Whether your equipment arrangement is a taxable rental or a potentially nontaxable service depends heavily on WHO bears responsibility for transportation, installation, daily maintenance, and return under the actual contract terms β€” not on how you label the deal. If the customer bears those burdens, expect the Comptroller to treat it as a rental, with tax due on the full rental amount and any related service charges.

Customers renting industrial equipment like compressors

Confirm whether your rental agreement's tax treatment matches your actual responsibilities under the contract β€” a resale or exemption certificate is the mechanism to avoid tax if you separately qualify.

Accountants and tax professionals

This letter is a useful illustration of how the Comptroller distinguishes a rental (tax on the full charge) from a service (potentially different, narrower tax treatment) by examining WHO the contract assigns transportation/installation/maintenance/return duties to β€” the classic care-custody-and-control test. Given the letter's own flagged 2017 rule amendment, treat this as illustrative of the analytical approach rather than as current law without independent verification.

Common questions

Q: Is compressor rental with vendor-provided installation and maintenance taxable as a rental?
A: Per this letter, it depends on who bears those responsibilities under the actual contract β€” here, because the lessee bore transportation/installation/maintenance/return duties, it was treated as a taxable rental.

Q: What tax applies to a rental transaction like this?
A: Per this letter, sales tax is due on the full rental/lease amount and any related service charges, unless the customer provides a valid resale or exemption certificate.

Q: Is this 1998 analysis still current law?
A: Not necessarily β€” per the currency alert carried in this record, Rule 3.285 (which now governs this topic) was amended in 2017, so verify against current guidance.

Citations and references

Statutes and rules:

  • 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rule 3.285 (Resale Certificates; Sales for Resale β€” amended 11/01/2017, postdates this letter)

Source

Original ruling text

ALERT: For specific guidance relating to the care, custody and control of TPP when providing a taxable service, please see Rule 3.285, Resale Certificates; Sales for Resale (amended 11/01/2017.

August 6, 1998




Dear Mr. **:

This is in response to your request that we review the attached contracts to
determine if the vendors, COMPANY A and COMPANY B are providing a service or
renting the compressors. You also asked what the sales tax implications are
regarding these contracts?

Response: After a review of the contracts that you provided, I conclude that
the transaction is a rental of tangible personal property by COMPANY A and
COMPANY B with care, custody and control of the equipment transferred to the
lessees. The COMPANY B contracts specify that the lessee is responsible for
and bears the expense of transporting the equipment from the Lessor's yard,
installation of the equipment, daily maintenance of the equipment and upon
termination of the rental, disconnection and return of the equipment to the
Lessor's yard. The COMPANY A contract is similar, with the exception that
COMPANY A is responsible for transporting the equipment to the lessee's site,
with the lessee responsible for unloading the equipment. COMPANY A and COMPANY
B provide minor repairs and replacement parts.

Sales tax is due on the rental/lease amount and related services charged by
COMPANY A and COMPANY B to their customers for this equipment, unless a valid
resale or exemption certificate can be issued by the customer.

This opinion is based on the facts presented. Other facts though similar may
provide a different result.

I hope this information answers your questions. If you need additional
information, please call me toll-free at 1-800-531-5441, extension 3-4502. The
direct line is 512/463-4502. You may also write to Tax Policy Division,
Comptroller of Public Accounts. You may also e-mail our tax help section at:

Sincerely,

Gilbert Zamora
Tax Policy Division

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1998 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.