🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
TX 9612847l Franchise Tax (PRIOR TO 01/01/2008) 1996-12-13

How did Texas treat S corporations and their subsidiaries before addressing the 1996 Small Business Job Protection Act changes?

Short answer: Under the existing 1994-Code reference, the S corporation and its C-corporation subsidiaries filed separately and reported earned surplus separately. The S corporation received no Schedule C deduction, and its earned surplus included income reported to the IRS as taxable to shareholders. Texas had not yet determined the 1996 Act's effect.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. This December 1996 response expressly says Texas had not explored the Small Business Job Protection Act's effects and answers only under then-existing law tied to the 1994 Internal Revenue Code. It assumes the corporation qualified as an S corporation under that Code. Confirm later legislation and current law. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

Texas had not yet analyzed the 1996 Act; under existing 1994-Code law, the S corporation and subsidiaries filed separately.

The Small Business Job Protection Act changes applied to federal tax years beginning after December 31, 1996 and would not affect annual Texas reports due before January 1, 1998. Texas still computed earned surplus using the 1994 Internal Revenue Code, and the agency anticipated that the 1997 Legislature might update that reference.

Under existing law, the Comptroller said:

  • The S corporation and C-corporation subsidiaries filed separate franchise-tax returns and reported earned surplus separately.
  • The S corporation received no Schedule C deduction.
  • Its earned surplus included income reported to the IRS as taxable to shareholders.

These observations assumed the corporation qualified as an S corporation under the 1994 Code.

What this means for you

S-corporation groups researching transition years

This letter is a pre-conformity snapshot, not a final interpretation of the 1996 federal Act.

Tax professionals

Verify which Internal Revenue Code reference Texas actually adopted for the report year before applying these rules.

Common questions

Q: Had Texas determined the 1996 Act's effect?
A: No.

Q: Did the S corporation and subsidiaries file together?
A: No, they filed separately.

Q: Did the S corporation receive a Schedule C deduction?
A: No under the existing-law answer.

Citations and references

  • Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996
  • Historical Texas reference to the 1994 Internal Revenue Code

Source

Original ruling text

December 13, 1996

To: **


Dear **:

Thank you for your recent e-mail about the franchise tax effects of the Small
Business Job Protection Act in regard to S corporations.

Current franchise tax law requires corporations to use the Internal Revenue
Code (IRC) in effect for the 1994 calendar year in computing earned surplus.
At this time, the agency has not explored the impact of the franchise tax
changes resulting from the Small Business Job Protection Act in regard to S
corporations.

We understand that this IRC change applies to federal tax years beginning after
December 31, 1996. Thus, the IRC change will not affect annual franchise tax
reports due prior to January 1, 1998, so we have some time to consider the
effects. Because the Texas Legislature will convene in January, 1997, we
anticipate that the legislature might update the IRC reference in the franchise
tax law.

Therefore, at this time we can answer your questions only on the basis of
existing franchise tax law [that is, based on the 1994 IRC]. We believe the
following would apply to your questions:

  1. The S corporation and C corporation subsidiaries would file separate
    franchise tax returns and report their earned surplus separately.

  2. The S corporation would receive no Schedule C deduction.

  3. The earned surplus of the S corporation would include income reportable to
    the Internal Revenue Service as taxable to the shareholders.

These observations are based on the presumption that the corporation would
qualify as an S corporation based on the 1994 Internal Revenue Code which is
currently required by the franchise tax law.

If you have questions about this, my internet address is
[email protected], or you may call me toll free at 1-800-531-5441,
extension 3-4662.

Sincerely,

Bob Jeffcoat
Tax Policy Division
Comptroller of Public Accounts

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1996 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.