🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
TX 9401148L Franchise Tax (PRIOR TO 01/01/2008) 1994-01-12

Is a foreign corporation that is a general partner in a partnership owning a Texas apartment building subject to Texas franchise tax?

Short answer: Yes. The Comptroller advised that a Wisconsin corporation that owns a general-partnership interest in a Wisconsin partnership whose main asset is a Texas apartment building has franchise-tax nexus, because a foreign corporation that is a general partner in a partnership doing business in Texas is itself doing business in Texas, and the partnership is doing business in Texas by owning Texas real property. The corporation is subject to both the taxable-capital and earned-surplus components. If the partnership were converted to an LLC, the corporation would no longer be subject, since merely holding a membership interest in an LLC doing business in Texas does not create nexus (though the LLC itself, treated as a corporation, would be subject).

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1994. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1994
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. This letter applies the Texas franchise tax as it existed before January 1, 2008; the 2007 legislation (House Bill 3 and House Bill 3928) later restructured the tax into the current margin tax and made partnerships taxable effective January 1, 2008, so its entity-level conclusions may be historical. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A Wisconsin corporation owned a general-partnership interest in a Wisconsin partnership whose primary asset was an apartment building in Texas. The taxpayer asked whether the corporation was subject to the Texas franchise tax.

The Comptroller advised yes:

  • A foreign corporation that is a general partner in a partnership doing business in Texas is itself considered to be doing business (to have nexus) in Texas.
  • The partnership is doing business in Texas because it owns real property (the apartment building) located in Texas.
  • Therefore the corporation is subject to both the taxable-capital and earned-surplus components of the franchise tax (Rules 3.546 and 3.554).

The letter added a structuring point: if the Wisconsin partnership were converted to a Wisconsin limited liability company, the corporation would no longer be subject to the franchise tax, because merely holding a membership interest in an LLC doing business in Texas does not create nexus for the member. The LLC itself — deemed a corporation for franchise-tax purposes — would have Texas nexus and be subject to the tax.

Important currency note: This letter applies the pre-2008 franchise tax. The 2007 legislation (House Bills 3 and 3928) restructured the tax into the current margin tax effective January 1, 2008 and made partnerships taxable, so these entity-level results may no longer hold. Confirm current law.

What this means for you

Out-of-state owners of Texas real estate

Holding Texas real estate through a partnership pulled the corporate general partner into the franchise tax. Under the pre-2008 rules, shifting to an LLC moved the tax to the LLC and off the corporate member — a distinction that the later margin tax changed.

Accountants and tax professionals

The nexus hook was general-partner status combined with the partnership's Texas real property. Note the LLC contrast: a member's LLC interest did not create member-level nexus, unlike a general-partnership interest. Re-verify under the margin tax.

Common questions

Q: Why did the Wisconsin corporation have Texas franchise-tax nexus?
A: Because it was a general partner in a partnership doing business in Texas (owning a Texas apartment building), which made the corporation itself a Texas taxpayer under both components.

Q: Would converting the partnership to an LLC change that?
A: Yes. The corporate member would no longer be subject, though the LLC itself (treated as a corporation) would be.

Citations and references

Statutes and rules:

  • Franchise Tax Rule 3.546 (Taxable Capital: Nexus)
  • Franchise Tax Rule 3.554 (Earned Surplus: Nexus)

Source

Original ruling text

January 12, 1994





Dear **:

In your letter of December 30, you requested a determination whether a
Wisconsin corporation, which owns a general partnership interest in a Wisconsin
partnership whose primary asset is an apartment building located in Texas, is
subject to the Texas franchise tax.

The Wisconsin corporation has sufficient nexus in Texas to subject it to the
Texas franchise Tax. A foreign corporation that is a general partner in a
partnership doing business in Texas is considered to be doing business (to have
nexus) in Texas. The partnership is considered to be doing business in Texas
because it owns real property located in Texas. Therefore, the corporation is
subject to both the taxable capital and earned surplus components of the
franchise tax. I have enclosed copies of Rules 3.546, Taxable Capital: Nexus,
and 3.554, Earned Surplus: Nexus.

If the Wisconsin partnership is converted to a Wisconsin limited liability
company, the corporation would no longer be subject to the franchise tax. The
limited liability company (deemed a corporation for franchise tax purposes)
would have nexus in Texas and be subject to the franchise tax. However, the
mere holding of a membership interest in a limited liability company that is
doing business in Texas does not create nexus for the Wisconsin corporation.

This response is based on the facts presented in your letter and current law.
If there are additional or different facts, the response may change.

If you have any further questions about this or any other franchise tax matter,
you may write me at Tax Administration Division, Comptroller of Public
Accounts. You may call toll free 1-800-531-5441, extension 34932. My direct
number is 512-463-4932.

Very truly yours,

Gloria E.R. Dossett
Tax Administration Division

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1994 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.