Does a Texas corporation owe sales or use tax when it distributes its equipment to shareholders as part of dissolving and liquidating the company?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1993. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A taxpayer asked the Comptroller whether a corporation owes sales or use tax when its shareholders receive corporate-owned equipment as part of dissolving the company. In the facts presented, one company ("Company A") planned to distribute equipment ("Y Equipment") to a shareholder ("Y") and separately distribute other equipment ("W Equipment") to another individual ("W"), who was receiving it as devisee of an estate ("X").
The Comptroller ruled that this kind of receipt of equipment by shareholders, as a liquidating distribution in a complete liquidation of the corporation, is not taxable. The reasoning given is simple: sales and use tax applies to a sale, and there is no sale here because the shareholders pay no consideration for the equipment they receive — it is distributed to them as owners of the dissolving corporation, not sold to them.
The letter notes that this opinion is based on the specific facts presented, and that the outcome could change if the facts were different.
What this means for you
Business owners dissolving or liquidating a corporation
If your corporation is winding up and distributing its tangible personal property (such as equipment) to its shareholders as part of a complete liquidation, and the shareholders are not paying anything for that property, the Comptroller's position in this letter is that no sales or use tax is due on the transfer — because there is no consideration, there is no taxable sale.
Accountants and tax professionals
This ruling turns entirely on the presence or absence of consideration. It does not identify or discuss any statute or administrative rule by number — the letter simply states the conclusion that a transfer without consideration is not a "sale" for sales/use tax purposes. Because the ruling is fact-specific and was issued to a particular taxpayer, it should be treated as illustrative of the Comptroller's reasoning rather than as a rule you can rely on directly for a different transaction.
Common questions
Q: Why isn't the equipment transfer to shareholders taxed?
A: Because the shareholders receive the equipment for no consideration. The letter treats sales and use tax as applying to sales, and without consideration passing from the shareholder to the corporation, the Comptroller concluded there is no sale to tax.
Q: Does it matter that one shareholder received the equipment as a devisee of an estate rather than directly as a shareholder?
A: The ruling addresses both situations together and reaches the same no-tax conclusion for both: the distribution of equipment to Y, and the distribution of equipment to W in his capacity as devisee of the estate of X, are each described as not taxable liquidating distributions made without consideration.
Q: Can I rely on this letter for my own company's liquidation?
A: Under Texas's detrimental-reliance rules, a STAR letter can generally be relied upon only by the taxpayer to whom it was issued, based on the specific facts that taxpayer presented. If your facts differ — for example, if any consideration is paid for the distributed property — the outcome could be different. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
Citations and references
No statutes or rules are cited in this letter.
Source
- STAR search: https://star.comptroller.texas.gov/search?doc_type_code=L&tax_type_code=SST
- Opinion: https://star.comptroller.texas.gov/view/9302L1224D06
Original ruling text
February 16, 1993
Dear **:
Thank you for your recent letter regarding the acquisition of
corporate-ownedctangible personal property by shareholders of the
corporation for nocconsideration.
Response: Based on the facts you presented in your letter, the receipt of
equipment by shareholders as liquidating distributions is not taxable as
therecis no consideration. Or, stated as you requested, sales or use tax
is not duecon Company A's distribution in complete liquidation of Y
Equipment to Y, orcCompany A's distribution in complete liquidation of
the W Equipment to W in hisccapacity as devisee of the estate of X.
This opinion is based on the facts presented. If there are additional or
different facts, the opinion may change.
If you have any questions or need more information, you may call me toll
freecat 1-800-531-5441, extension 3-4633. The regular number is
512/463-4633. Youcmay also write to the Tax Administration Division.
Sincerely,
Wanda Hutcheson
Tax Administration Division
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read a 1993 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.