If a cable company rebuilds and upgrades its existing cable plant (like boosting channel capacity from 36 to 54 channels), is that taxed as new construction or as remodeling of real property?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1993. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.
Plain-English Summary
This is not a taxpayer-facing letter ruling -- it is an internal January 1993 memo from Gilbert Zamora (Tax Administration) to Tony F. Peeler (Audit), answering an audit question about how to classify a cable contractor's work on an existing cable TV system.
The auditor was reviewing a contract between "Company A" and "Company B" covering labor and tools to rebuild about 200 miles of aerial cable plant and 5 miles of underground cable plant, plus labor and materials to replace or swing about 12,000 house drops. The memo also references an earlier April 27, 1990 memo (fiche #9004L1018E04) that had caused confusion: it said dropping the old cable system onto J-hooks is new construction, but that reusing materials from an existing cable plant to rebuild it, or adding new wire to existing poles where wire already ran, is remodeling.
The memo resolves the classification by relying on Hearings Decision 27,181 (issued December 31, 1992), a case where a cable company upgraded its television transmission capacity from 36 channels to 54 channels. The Administrative Law Judge in that decision held that "replacement or upgrading of any part of an existing structure is remodeling or modification," because after the work the system was still functionally the same TV cable system it was before.
Applying that holding, the memo concludes: the audited contract -- rebuilding aerial and underground cable plant and replacing house drops -- is remodeling/modification of the existing plant, not new construction. Reusing part of an existing cable system does not automatically make work remodeling (each case still gets its own facts-based look), and the 5% materials-reuse threshold in Rule 3.357 does not apply to this analysis. Only demolishing and removing an entire existing cable system and erecting a wholly new one would count as total replacement (new construction). Taking out existing wire entirely and installing new, more powerful or technologically upgraded wire is still remodeling, not new construction.
What This Means For You
If you operate or contract for a cable TV company
Rebuilding, replacing, or technologically upgrading parts of an existing cable plant -- even wholesale replacement of wire, poles, and house drops, or a big capacity upgrade like going from 36 to 54 channels -- is treated as remodeling of real property, not new construction, as long as the resulting system is still functionally the same cable system. That distinction matters because Texas taxes real property repair/remodeling labor differently than new construction labor.
If you are an auditor classifying cable plant work
This memo gives auditors a concrete precedent (Hearings Decision 27,181) for classifying cable rebuild/upgrade contracts as remodeling. The 5% reused-materials threshold in Rule 3.357 does not control this determination. True new construction requires demolishing and removing the entire existing system and erecting an entirely new one -- a full teardown-and-rebuild, not an upgrade or repair of the existing plant.
If you are relying on the 1990 Whittemore memo (fiche #9004L1018E04)
That earlier memo's statement that dropping cable on J-hooks is "new construction" is not disturbed here, but this memo confirms the flip side: reusing existing materials to rebuild a cable plant, or adding new wire to poles that already carried wire, is remodeling -- consistent with the outcome reached in this cable-plant-rebuild contract.
Q&A
Q: Is rebuilding or replacing parts of an existing cable TV plant considered new construction?
A: No, according to this memo. As long as the system remains functionally the same cable system before and after the work, it's remodeling/modification, not new construction -- even for large rebuilds (here, ~200 miles of aerial cable, 5 miles of underground cable, and ~12,000 house drops).
Q: Does increasing a cable system's channel capacity (e.g., from 36 to 54 channels) count as new construction?
A: No. Per Hearings Decision 27,181 (issued December 31, 1992), the Administrative Law Judge held that "replacement or upgrading of any part of an existing structure is remodeling or modification," because the system was still a TV cable system both before and after the upgrade.
Q: If part of an existing cable system is reused, does that automatically make the work remodeling?
A: The memo doesn't state a blanket rule either way on reuse alone -- it points back to the general remodeling analysis above (functionally the same system before and after) rather than adopting a standalone "any reuse = remodeling" test.
Q: Does the 5% materials-reuse requirement in Rule 3.357 apply to this determination?
A: No. The memo explicitly answers "No" when asked whether the 5% requirement in Rule 3.357 applies.
Q: What counts as total replacement of a cable system (i.e., new construction)?
A: Demolishing or removing the entire existing cable system and then erecting or installing a totally new cable system.
Q: Is taking out existing wire and replacing it with new, more powerful or technologically upgraded wire considered remodeling?
A: Yes, per this memo -- it's treated the same as the general upgrade/remodeling analysis above.
Q: Is this an official letter ruling a taxpayer can rely on?
A: No. It is an internal Comptroller staff memo answering an audit question, not a taxpayer-specific letter ruling, so it does not carry letter-ruling reliance protection under 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10. It also notes it is based on the facts presented, and that different or additional facts could change the outcome.
Citations and references
- Hearings Decision 27,181 (issued December 31, 1992) -- cable company upgrading capacity from 36 to 54 channels held to be remodeling/modification, not new construction.
- 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rule 3.357 -- the 5% requirement referenced in the memo does not apply to this determination.
- Prior memo by Adina Whittemore, dated April 27, 1990 (fiche #9004L1018E04), on dropping cable systems onto J-hooks and reuse of existing materials.
- Microfiche research: Fiche #1214C03.
Source
- STAR search: https://star.comptroller.texas.gov/search?doc_type_code=L&tax_type_code=SST
- Opinion: https://star.comptroller.texas.gov/view/9301854L
Original ruling text
TO: Tony F. Peeler
** Audit, **
FROM: Gilbert Zamora
Tax Administration
DATE: January 28, 1993
SUBJECT: Cable Plant Repair, Remodeling, New Construction
CONDITIONS LEADING TO INQUIRY
I am currently conducting an audit on COMPANY A and need assistance in
determining whether work performed by a cable contractor is considered real
property repair or new construction. I have enclosed a copy of the contract
between COMPANY A and COMPANY B
There has been some confusion on the taxability of rebuilding or replacing a
cable system. On a memo written to the ASSOCIATION by Adina Whittemore on April
27, 1990 (fiche #9004L1018E04) stated that dropping the old cable system on
J-Hooks is considered new construction. However, statements in the memo
indicate that any materials taken from an existing cable plant and used to
rebuild a cable plant constitute remodeling, not new construction. It also
indicates that adding existing poles and new wire where there was wire before
constitutes remodeling.
SPECIFIC INQUIRY
Regarding the attached contract:
- Is this contract new construction or real property repair and remodeling?
RESPONSE: Exhibit A of the agreement signed by COMPANY A (Agreement No.
**) identifies the project as labor and tools to rebuild
approximately 200 miles of aerial rebuild and 5 miles of underground rebuild
and labor and materials to replace or swing approximately 12,000 house drops
and ground as required.
Based on Hearings Decision 27,181, issued December 31, 1992, this contract is
for the remodeling or modification of the existing plant rather than new
construction.
In that hearing, the petitioner was upgrading a television cable company's
capacity from 36 channels to 54 channels. The Administrative Law Judge stated
that "replacement or upgrading of any part of an existing structure is
remodeling or modification" When the work was completed the new system was
functionally no different from the old cable system. It was a TV cable system
before the work, and it was a TV cable system afterwards.
- If any part of a cable system is reused, does this automatically qualify it
as remodeling?
RESPONSE: See response to 1.
2a. Does the 5% requirement as stated in Rule 3.357 apply?
RESPONSE: No.
- What constitutes total replacement of a cable system?
RESPONSE: Demolishing or removing the entire existing cable system and then
erecting or installing a totally new cable system would qualify as total
replacement of a cable system.
- Is taking out existing wire totally and replacing it with new wire, which
enhances power or technology, considered remodeling?
RESPONSE: Yes, see response to 1.
- If the contract is considered real property repair and remodeling is there
any portion that would be considered new construction?
RESPONSE: No.
This opinion is based on the facts presented. If there are different or
additional facts, this opinion could change.
Microfiche research includes:
Fiche #1214C03
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read a 1993 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.