🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
TX 9009L1044G11 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1990-09-10

Did a predominant-use utility study completed before August 3, 1987 need later engineer certification or a replacement study?

Short answer: No. Pre-August 3, 1987 studies needed neither engineer certification nor replacement, though changed utility uses required an update.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1990. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1990
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A utility planned to send redesigned exemption certificates to customers that had claimed predominant-use exemptions before engineer certification became mandatory.

The Comptroller accepted keeping the old certificate together with the new one. Engineer certification applied to studies performed on or after August 3, 1987. Earlier studies did not need certification or replacement.

If utility uses changed, the study had to be updated to confirm continued qualification, but the update did not require engineer certification.

What this means for you

The ruling grandfathered the certification status of pre-effective-date studies, not unchanged eligibility forever. Changed use still triggered a substantive update.

Common questions

Did an older study need engineer certification? No.

Did the customer need a completely new study? No.

What if utility use changed? The study had to be updated, without engineer certification.

Citations and references

  • No numbered statute or rule was cited in the letter.

Source

Original ruling text

COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
STATE OF TEXAS
AUSTIN, 78774

BOB BULLOCK
Comptroller September 10, 1990




Dear **:

Thank you for your letter concerning the updating of your sales tax
exemption certificates.

As I understand, you are going to mail newly designed certificates
to all of your exempt customers and are concerned about exemption
certificates for customers who claimed sales tax exemption based on
predominant use before the requirement that the study be certified
by an engineer.

You requested that customers who were claiming exemption based on
predominant use prior to August 3, 1987, be allowed to complete the
new exemption certificate without requiring engineer's certifica-
tion. You stated that for those customers you would maintain a copy
of the old certificate with the new certificate in your files. Your
request is acceptable.

The requirement that a utility study be certified by an engineer
was effective August 3, 1987, and applies to studies performed on
or after that date. Customers that had studies performed prior to
that date are not required to have those studies certified by an en-
gineer nor to perform new studies. However, studies must be updated
if there are any changes in the utility uses to be sure that the
utility continues to qualify for exemption. The update would not
require an engineer's certification.

This opinion is based on the facts presented. If there are addition-
al or different facts, the opinion may change.

If you have any questions or need additional information, you may
call me toll free at 1- 800- 252- 5555, extension 3-4666. You may
write to Tax Correspondence, Comptroller of Public Accounts.

Sincerely,
Jo Ann Dieck
Tax Correspondence

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1990 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.