🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
TX 9006L1026G06 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1990-06-06

Was applying a protective sealcoat to deteriorating asphalt taxable restoration or nontaxable scheduled maintenance, and could a signed exemption certificate protect the contractor?

Short answer: The Comptroller classified the sealcoating as taxable restoration because the product materials described stages of asphalt deterioration and steps to restore it. Calling the proposal “parking lot maintenance” did not control. The submitted exemption-certificate wording could be sufficient if the purchaser completed and signed it and the contractor did not know the work was restoration.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1990. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1990
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

Applying the protective asphalt sealcoat was taxable restoration rather than nontaxable maintenance.

The manufacturer described stages of asphalt deterioration and steps needed to restore it, which led the Comptroller to the restoration classification. Merely labeling the proposal “parking lot maintenance” did not make the work exempt, and the letter viewed scheduling as carrying a sense of regularity.

The submitted exemption-certificate wording could be sufficient when completed and signed by the purchaser, provided the contractor did not know that the actual work was restoration. The contractor was directed to resolve existing assessment and penalty issues with the auditor and Audit Division.

Common questions

Sealcoating classified as maintenance? No.

Did the proposal label control? No.

Could the exemption certificate be accepted? Its wording could be sufficient if properly completed and the contractor lacked knowledge that the work was restoration.

Source

Original ruling text

June 6, 1990




Dear **:

In your letter of May 1st, you asked why this agency would consider the
application of protective coatings such as the coal tax sealant "Sealmaster" to
be taxable. It was a close call.

After I talked to you, I called the manufacturer of your product. They sent
me an excerpt from their training manual detailing the various stages of
asphalt deterioration and the steps necessary to restore it. With these facts,
my superiors were of the opinion that the sealcoating process more nearly
resembled restoration than maintenance.

You also comment that the definition of maintenance does not require regular
scheduling. I agree that the word "regular" is not in the definition.
However, the word "schedule" itself has the connotation of regularity.

The term "parking lot maintenance" in your sample proposal is not sufficient
to exempt the work from sales tax. But, the wording on the exemption
certificate you submitted will be sufficient if completed and signed by the
purchaser, assuming you don't have knowledge that the work to be done is
restoration.

You should deal directly with your auditor and the Audit Division in resolving
any tax or penalty assessments arising from the current examination of your
records.

If you have questions or need more information, please call our toll-free
number 1-800-531-5441. My direct line number is 463-4680 [FAX (512) 475-0900].
You may write to me in care of Taxability Section.

Sincerely,

Al Van Allen
Taxability Section
Legal Services Division

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1990 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.