🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
TX 8803L0878E14 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1988-03-28

Could a security company exclude separately stated insurance, patrol-vehicle, polygraph, or administrative costs from its taxable service charge?

Short answer: No. All were taxable as costs directly related to the security service, even when separately stated. A polygraph examination performed apart from security service was not taxable.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1988. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1988
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official 1988 Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter concerning one security-service provider, published on STAR. Its bundled-cost and standalone-polygraph classifications reflect the guidance stated when issued; verify current security-service rules before applying them today. Letters on STAR can support detrimental reliance only for the taxpayer directly issued the letter and may no longer represent current policy. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A security company separately rebilled site-specific officer insurance premiums, a patrol-vehicle lease, third-party polygraph tests, and a 7%–10% administrative charge.

The Comptroller said all of those costs were directly related to providing taxable security services and remained in the taxable total charge, whether separately itemized or billed as one lump sum.

A polygraph examination performed separate and apart from a security service was not taxable.

What this means for you

Separately stating an internal cost or pass-through did not remove it from the security-service tax base under the 1988 letter. The standalone nature of a polygraph service changed its treatment.

Common questions

Were rebilled officer-insurance premiums taxable? Yes, as part of the security-service charge.

Was the patrol-vehicle lease cost taxable when rebilled? Yes.

Were polygraph costs taxable inside the security engagement? Yes.

Was a standalone polygraph examination taxable? No.

Citations and references

The letter did not cite a rule or statute by number.

Source

Original ruling text

COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
STATE OF TEXAS
AUSTIN, 78774

BOB BULLOCK
Comptroller March 28, 1988




Dear ***:

Thank you for your recent letter regarding Security Services. Each of
the
cost breakdown categories you mentioned is restated with response below.

  1. Non-Taxable Insurance premiums paid by our company for officers
    assigned to a specific site and rebilled at cost to that site. It was
    my understanding that these premiums should not be taxed when rebilled
    to a customer.

Response 1: Charges for services or expenses that are directly related
to and incurred while providing security services are taxable and may
not be separated from the tax base or total charge for the taxable ser-
vice. This is an expense you incur when providing security services.
Therefore, you must collect sales tax on the total charge for security
services billed to your customer, whether billed as separate line items
or as a lump-sum charge.

  1. Monthly lease for a patrol vehicle on which a sales tax has already
    been paid. We were told that this need not be re-taxed by us.

Response 2: Same as for response 1.

  1. Non-Taxable polygraph tests which are done by a third party, billed
    to us and rebilled to the client. As with #1, it was our understanding
    that these are not to be taxed as they are not part of our service and
    in themselves are not taxable.

Response 3: Same as for response 1. However, when a polygraph examina-
tion is done separate and apart from the provision of a security service,
the charge is not taxable.

  1. An Administrative Charge (7%-l0%) which is added to items rebilled at
    our cost. Again, we understood that as this is not a part of our licensed
    security service, that it was not to be taxed.

Response 4: Same as for response 1.

This opinion is based on the facts presented. If there are additional or
different facts, the opinion may change.

If you have any questions or need more information, please call our toll-
free number 1-800-531-5441. The regular number is 512/463-4600. You may
write me at the Tax Policy Division.

Sincerely,
Al Van Allen
Tax Policy Division

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1988 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.