🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
TX 8802L0875F11 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1988-02-05

How did Texas tax water conditioning when the provider retained equipment control, sold and plumbed equipment, or performed scheduled maintenance?

Short answer: Provider-controlled conditioning was nontaxable service. Sold equipment became realty when plumbed; existing commercial installation was taxable remodeling, while scheduled maintenance was nontaxable.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1988. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1988
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official February 5, 1988 Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter applying Rules 3.291 and 3.357, published on STAR. Its control, fixture, contractor, remodeling, maintenance, salt, and resin treatment is historical; verify current water-treatment and real-property-service rules before applying it today. Letters on STAR can support detrimental reliance only for the taxpayer directly issued the letter and may no longer represent current policy. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

When control of water-conditioning equipment did not pass to the customer, the Comptroller treated the conditioning as a nontaxable service.

When a customer bought the equipment, control passed to the customer, and equipment plumbed into the building became an improvement to realty. Installation in a residence or in a nonresidential building during original construction under the general contractor followed Rule 3.291 contractor treatment. Plumbing sold equipment into an existing nonresidential building was taxable remodeling on the total charge under Rule 3.357.

Regularly scheduled service of customer-owned units was nontaxable real-property maintenance when the provider kept schedules in its records. The provider paid tax on salt and resin incorporated during that maintenance.

What this means for you

The 1988 result depended on control, ownership, building status, and whether later work was documented scheduled maintenance.

Common questions

Was provider-controlled conditioning taxable? No.

Did sold, plumbed equipment become real property? Yes.

Was installation in an existing commercial building taxable? Yes, on the total charge.

Was scheduled maintenance taxable? No, but the provider paid tax on salt and resin.

Citations and references

  • 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rule 3.291, applied to contractor work.
  • Rule 3.357(a)(3), applied to scheduled maintenance; Rule 3.357 also governed remodeling.

Source

Original ruling text

COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
STATE OF TEXAS
AUSTIN, TEXAS 78774

February 5, 1988




Dear *:

On behalf of Mr. Bullock, I hope you'll accept my apology for the delay
in answering your question involving changes in the sales tax law. This
isn't the way we normally do business.

Our people were, and still are, swamped by a deluge of inquiries as they
attempted to interpret provisions of the new law and draft rules which
would not adversely impact businesses. In many instances, an answer to a
question just wasn't available when the question arrived.

I am enclosing an edited copy of a letter discussing the taxability of
the portable exchange system and the automatic service system. The
element of control is very important. Because control of the equipment
does not pass to the customer, the water conditioning is treated as a
nontaxable service.

When a customer purchases water conditioning equipment, control of the
equipment passes to the customer. When the equipment is plumbed into the
building it becomes an improvement to realty.

If the water conditioning equipment sold is plumbed into a residence or
into a non-residential building at the time it is constructed and you act
under the authority of the general contractor, you will be treated as a
contractor under the enclosed Rule 3.291.

If the water conditioning equipment sold in plumbed into an existing
non-residential building, the work will be treated as remodeling, under
Rule 3.357 enclosed. As such, the total charge will be subject to sales
tax.

It appears from your letter that you service the units you sell on a
regularly scheduled basis. If this is the case and you maintain sched-
ules in your records, we would treat you as maintaining real property as
described in Rule 3.357(a)(3). As such, your charges will not be tax-
able. However, you would pay tax on all your purchases of salt and
resin incorporated into customer owned units during maintenance.

This opinion is based on the facts presented. If there are additional or
different facts, the opinion may change.

If you have any questions or need more information, please call our
toll-free number 1-800-531-5441. The regular number is 512/463-4600.
You may write me at the Tax Policy Division.

Sincerely,
Al Van Allen
Tax Policy Division

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1988 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.