🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
TX 8801L0850G06 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1988-01-19

When did a law-firm investigator's work become taxable licensed security service rather than nontaxable employee wages?

Short answer: Regular employee wages were nontaxable when the investigator qualified for the Act's employee exemption. Licensed or permit-required contract security work was taxable, including work for the law firm if the relationship was contract labor rather than employment.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1988. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1988
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a taxpayer-specific January 1988 Texas Comptroller letter applying the then-current Private Investigators and Private Security Agencies Act and Rule 3.333. It says the opinion may change if the facts differ. Employment status, licensing, permits, security-service taxability, wages, and contract-labor tests may have changed; verify current law and current worker-classification standards. STAR documents may no longer represent current policy even when not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The investigator worked exclusively as an employee of one law firm. When regularly employed, the worker qualified for the employee exemption in Section 3(a)(1) of the Act and did not charge sales tax on wages.

Security services requiring a license under Section 13(a) were taxable. Once the investigator had to hold the permit, all security services provided under that permit were taxable—including charges to the law firm if the work was contract labor rather than employee labor.

The letter listed five employment factors: who controlled the work details, paid salary, withheld federal taxes, provided employment benefits, and had termination rights.

What this means for you

The historical distinction followed the real employment relationship and licensing requirement. Calling the same person an employee for one engagement and an independent contractor for another did not eliminate tax on permit-required contract work.

Common questions

Were employee wages taxable? No, when the worker qualified as a regular employee.

Was licensed part-time investigative work taxable? Yes, when it required a license under the Act.

Could work for the law firm become taxable? Yes, if performed as contract labor rather than employee labor.

Citations and references

  • Texas Private Investigators and Private Security Agencies Act, V.A.C.S. art. 4413(29bb), §§ 3(a)(1), 13(a).
  • 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rule 3.333 — historical security-services rule.

Source

Original ruling text

COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
STATE OF TEXAS
AUSTIN, 78774

BOB BULLOCK
Comptroller January 19, 1988




Dear **:

Thank you for your follow up letter which is restated in part with
response
below.

FACTS

I am employed by one Law Firm, as a investigator. I work exclusively
for this firm. I am not required to be licensed under the Texas Pri-
vate Investigators and Private Security Agencies Act. Therefore, I am
not required to collect Texas sales tax from my employer.

Question A:

May I operate as a part time job/part time extra income. Be licensed
under the Texas Private Investigators and Private Security Agencies
Act AND COLLECT STATE OF TEXAS SALES TAX ON WORK I DO THAT DOES REQUIRE
ME TO BE LICENSED UNDER THE ACT?

Question B:

May I wear TWO DIFFERENT HATS (Operate as two separate entities)?

Not collect State of Texas Sales Tax on work that I do which I AM
NOT REQUIRED to be licensed under the ACT?

Response: When you provide security services which require a license
under section 13(a) of The Private Investigators and Private Security
Agency Act Article 4413(29bb) V.A.C.S. (The Act) you are required to
charge sales tax on those services.

If you are regularly employed by an employer in providing those services,
you are exempt from the provisions of The Act under section 3(a)(1).
Therefore, you would not be required to charge your employer sales tax on
your wages.

In determining when a person is the employer of an individual, factors
which will be considered include:

(A) who exercises direct control over the details of how the work
is performed by the employee;

(B) who pays the employee's salary;

(C) who withholds applicable federal taxes from the employee's
salary;

(D) who provides employment-related benefits such as health
insurance, eligibility to participate in a retirement plan,
sick leave, vacation, etc., to the employee; and

(E) who has the right to terminate the employment of the
individual employee.

At such time as you are required to hold a permit under section 13(a)
of The Act, you are required to charge sales tax on all the security
services you provide. This would include those charges to the law
firm or anyone else if your work is contract labor rather than em-
ployee labor.

I am enclosing Rule 3.333 for your reference.

This opinion is based on the facts presented. If there are additional
or different facts, the opinion may change.

If you have any questions or need more information, please call our toll-
free number 1-800-531-5441. The regular number is 512/463-4600. You may
write me at the Tax Policy Division.

Sincerely,
Al Van Allen
Tax Policy Division

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1988 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.