🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
TX 8710L0843D08 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1987-10-27

Did a Texas motor-vehicle repairer charge customers tax on lump-sum bodywork, painting, rustproofing, or undercoating, and how were decorative painting charges treated?

Short answer: No tax was billed on lump-sum repairs; the repairer paid tax on materials. Murals, pinstriping, and signs were taxable on the total charge.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1987. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1987
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a taxpayer-specific October 1987 Texas Comptroller letter about lump-sum vehicle repairs and decorative painting. It says the opinion may change if the facts differ. Its repair-versus-sale treatment is historical; verify current rules for labor, materials, lump-sum billing, and vehicle customization. STAR documents may no longer represent current policy even when not marked superseded. Identities are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

For motor-vehicle repairs billed as one lump sum, the repairer did not bill the customer for sales tax. Instead, the repairer was the ultimate consumer of the materials and paid tax to its suppliers.

The letter listed bodywork, regular painting, rustproofing, and undercoating as examples of vehicle repairs. By contrast, painting murals, pinstriping, or signs on a vehicle required collecting tax on the total charge.

What this means for you

The historical letter distinguished repair work from decorative vehicle painting. How the work was characterized—and, for repairs, the lump-sum billing described—determined whether tax was collected from the customer or paid on materials by the repairer.

Common questions

Did the repairer collect tax on a lump-sum vehicle repair? No.

Who paid tax on the repair materials? The repairer paid its suppliers.

Were rustproofing and undercoating treated as repairs? Yes.

Were murals, pinstriping, and signs taxable? Yes, on the total charge.

Citations and references

  • No statute or rule number is cited in the ruling text.

Source

Original ruling text

COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
STATE OF TEXAS
AUSTIN, 78774

BOB BULLOCK
Comptroller October 27, 1987




Dear **:

Thank you for your recent letter concerning your sales and use tax
responsibilities.

If you are repairing a motor vehicle for one lump-sum charge, you should
not bill your customer for the tax. As a repairman, you are the ultimate
consumer of materials and should pay tax to your suppliers. Some
examples
of repairs to motor vehicles include: body work, regular painting, rust
proofing, and undercoating.

However, if you paint murals, pinstriping, or signs on motor vehicles,
you should collect tax on the total charge.

This opinion is based on the facts presented. If there are additional or
different facts, the opinion may change.

If you have any questions or need more information, please call me at
1-800-252-5555 toll free from anywhere in Texas. The regular number is
512/463-4600. You may write me at the Tax Policy Division.

Sincerely,
Adina Whittemore
Tax Policy Division

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1987 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.