🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
TX 8701L0788A03 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1987-01-13

What general rule did Texas state for written contracts or bids signed before January 1, 1987 when no contract copy was supplied?

Short answer: The Comptroller could not decide the unnamed contract without a copy. Generally, a pre-1987 written contract or bid for specific items qualified until it ended, was renegotiated or renewed, or September 30, 1989.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1987. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1987
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This STAR record combines a December 9, 1986 Crown Central Petroleum request about invoice date versus activity date with a January 13, 1987 reply to James E. Rude of InterFirst Corporation about a different December 17 contract letter. The reply does not answer Crown's question. The historical prior-contract exemption expired September 30, 1989. Verify current contract, rate, invoice, activity-date, state, local, and MTA tax rules. STAR documents may no longer represent current policy even when not marked superseded. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The operative Comptroller reply said it could not determine whether the referenced contract qualified because the taxpayer had not included a contract copy.

The reply gave a general historical rule: a written contract or written bid for specific items signed before January 1, 1987 qualified until the original contract ended or was renegotiated or renewed. All prior-contract exemptions expired September 30, 1989.

The STAR record is internally mismatched. It begins with a December 9 Crown Central Petroleum request asking whether the 1987 rate increase followed invoice date or activity date, but the attached reply is addressed to James E. Rude of InterFirst Corporation and refers to a different December 17 letter. The reply does not resolve Crown's invoice-versus-activity question.

What this means for you

The general prior-contract rule is stated in the reply, but no taxpayer-specific conclusion was possible without the contract. The separate Crown question remains unanswered in this record.

Common questions

Did the Comptroller approve the referenced contract? No. It lacked the contract copy.

What documents generally qualified? Written contracts or bids for specific items signed before January 1, 1987.

When did protection end? At contract end, renegotiation or renewal, or September 30, 1989.

Did the reply answer whether invoice date or activity date controlled? No.

Citations and references

  • The reply cited no numbered statute or Comptroller rule.

Source

Original ruling text

CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION
P.O. BOX 1759 * HOUSTON, TEXAS 77251

December 9, 1986

Comptroller of Public Accounts
Capital Station
State of Texas
Austin, Texas 78774

SUBJECT: TEXAS SALES & USE TAXES FOR CONTRACTORS

Dear Sir,

We are requesting information concerning the new state sales use tax rate
increase effective January 1, 1987.

Please let us know if the rate increase will be effective according to
the
invoice date or from the date of activity.

Your written reply is requested. Thank you in advance for your help.

Sincerely,

Cleve King
Contract Compliance
Accountant

CK/s

COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
STATE OF TEXAS
AUSTIN, 78774

January 13, 1987

James E. Rude
InterFirst Corporation
P.O. Box 83000
Dallas, TX 75283-1174

Dear Mr. Rude:

Thank you for your letter of December 17, 1986, concerning an exemption
from
the increase in the sales tax rate for a contract entered into prior to
January 1, 1987.

You did not include a copy of the contract, therefore it is not possible
to
determine whether the contract you refer to qualifies for exemption.

In general, if a written contract or written bid for the purchase of
specific
items is signed prior to January 1, 1987, it will qualify until the
original
contract ends or until renegotiated or renewed. All prior contract
exemptions will expire September 30, 1989.

This opinion is based in the facts presented. If there are additional or
different facts, the opinion may change.

If you have any questions or need more information, please call me at
1-800-252-5555 toll free from anywhere in Texas. The regular number is
512/463-4600. You may write me at the Tax Administration Division.

Sincerely,

Julie Pesl
Tax Policy Section
Tax Administration Division

JP/gb

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1987 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.