🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
TX 8608L0753D01 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1986-08-19

Could a prestressed-concrete business claim manufacturing exemptions while acting as a lump-sum or separated contractor, and how was cement treated?

Short answer: No manufacturing exemption applied while it acted as a contractor; only outright sales were treated as manufacturing. Lump-sum cement created no sales-tax liability, while separated-contract concrete-form charges were taxable.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1986. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1986
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The taxpayer manufactured prestressed concrete and maintained tax-free inventory. It made outright sales, installed concrete under separated contracts, and installed it under lump-sum contracts. On lump-sum work it accrued tax on materials pulled from inventory and incorporated into the job.

The letter said the taxpayer incurred no sales-tax liability on cement incorporated into lump-sum contracts because cement was taxed under Chapter 181. For separated contracts, however, the customer's charge for cement incorporated into prestressed forms was taxable: the taxpayer sold concrete forms, not cement.

The Comptroller also said the company could not act as both manufacturer and contractor in the same transaction. It could not claim manufacturing exemptions when performing lump-sum or separated contracts. It was treated as a manufacturer only when it made outright sales.

Common questions

Was cement used in lump-sum contracts subject to sales tax? The letter said no, because cement was taxed under Chapter 181.

Was the cement component of prestressed forms under a separated contract taxable? Yes. The customer was buying concrete forms, not cement.

Could the contractor claim manufacturing exemptions on installed work? No, whether the contract was lump-sum or separated.

When could it be treated as a manufacturer? Only on outright sales.

Citations and references

  • Chapter 181 — cement tax treatment identified in the letter.

Source

Original ruling text

DATE: August 19, 1986
TO: Richard DuPree, ***
FROM:
*****, Tax Policy
SUBJECT: CORP X

The taxpayer is a contractor who manufactures pre-stressed concrete. The
taxpayer maintains a tax-free inventory. The taxpayer either sells the
concrete outright, installed as a separated contract, or installs it as a
lump-sum contract. The taxpayer mainly, performs lump-sum contracts. On the
lump-sum contracts, the taxpayer accrues tax on the materials pulled from
inventory which are directly, incorporated into the job. The materials include
sand, gravel, aggregate, admixture and cement. The Taxpayer's job cost reports
detail this information.

Questions:

1) Is the cost of the cement incorporated into the lump-sum contracts
taxable under sales tax?

Answer: *** incurs no sales tax liability on the cement. Cement is
taxed under Chapter 181.

2) Is the cost of the cement incorporated into the separated contracts
taxable under sales tax?

Answer: The charge by *** to its customers for cement
incorporated into prestressed forms is taxable.
***** is not selling
cement but concrete forms.

3) Since the taxpayer manufactures the prestressed concrete and either
sells it outright, installs it as a separated contract or a lump-sum contract,
is the taxpayer entitled to any manufacturing exemptions?

Answer: A company may not wear two hats, that of a manufacturer and a
contractor. When *** is acting as a lump-sum or separated contractor,
they are not entitled to any manufacturing exemptions. Only when they make
outright sales can they be treated as a manufacturer.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1986 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.