🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
TX 8509L0663B07 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1985-09-12

Did the 30-day export presumption apply to goods held by a freight forwarder arranging shipment?

Short answer: No. A retailer with the proof specified by Rule 3.323(c)(1) was not responsible for the 30-day period, and a forwarder's shipment arrangements were not purchaser storage.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1985. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1985
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official 1985 Texas Comptroller taxpayer-response letter applying then-current Rule 3.323 to export documentation and goods held by a freight forwarder arranging shipment. It says exceptions to the one-month storage presumption were generally judged case by case and that different facts could change the opinion. Current export, documentation, freight-forwarder, storage, and sales-tax rules may differ, and STAR documents may no longer represent current policy even when not marked superseded. Letters on STAR can support detrimental reliance only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued under 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The export rule did not affect the retailer's existing resale, direct-pay, or offshore exemptions.

For export proof, Rule 3.323(c)(1)(D) accepted a copy of the original airway, ocean, or railroad bill of lading describing the goods, plus the freight forwarder's receipt when the forwarder took possession in Texas. A retailer that obtained the proof specified in subsection (c)(1) was not responsible for the 30-day period.

Although property remaining in Texas longer than a month was presumed stored under subsection (c)(3), property held by a freight forwarder while arranging shipment was not treated as purchaser storage subject to that limitation.

Common questions

Did the export rule invalidate the listed existing exemptions? No.

What proof could the retailer use when a Texas freight forwarder took possession? The described bill of lading and the freight forwarder's receipt.

Did the 30-day presumption apply while the forwarder arranged shipment? No.

Citations and references

  • 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rule 3.323(c)(1)(D) — export documentation quoted in the letter.
  • 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rule 3.323(c)(3) — Texas storage and the one-month presumption discussed in the letter.

Source

Original ruling text

September 12, 1985




Dear ***:

Thank you for your letter concerning the changes in the documentation
required for the proof of export exemption.

Your specific questions with my answers follow:

  1. Present exemptions on file are still valid and were not affected by
    the new law, i.e., Resale Exemptions, Direct Pay Exemption, Offshore
    Exemption.

Answer: That is correct. The export rule and law have nothing to do
with any of the above exemptions.

  1. If merchandise has been shipped from COMPANY A to a forwarder, the
    thirty-day time limit for exportation does not affect COMPANY A. We
    are not responsible for collecting this tax nor for follow-up to insure
    this was shipped out of the country within 30 days. And,

  2. Any other interpretation information that will aid us in conforming
    to this law without creating massive amounts of additional paperwork.

Answer: Sec. (c)(1)(D) of Rule 3.323 states, ""A copy of the original
airway, ocean or railroad bill of lading which describes the items being
exported and a copy of the freight forwarder's receipt if the freight
forwarder takes possession of the property in Texas," is acceptable as
proof of export for the retailer making delivery.

Sec. (c)(3) deals with storage in Texas prior to export, and says in
part, "...property stored in Texas loses its exemption..." sufficient
time will be allowed to arrange for shipping. Property in Texas longer
than a month from date of purchase will be presumed to have been stored.

We feel this is sufficient time, but also realize there will be exceptions
and generally are judged on a case by case basis. This however does not fall
on a retailer who obtains proof as outlined in Sec.(c)(1). Property in the
hands of a freight forwarder who is arranging for shipment is not being stored
by the purchaser and is not subject to the thirty day limitations.

This opinion is based on the facts presented. If there are additional
or different facts, the opinion may change.

If you have any questions or need more information, please call us at
1-800-252-5555 toll free from anywhere in Texas. You may write us at the
Tax Administration Division.

Sincerely,

Tax Policy Section
Tax Administration Division

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1985 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.