🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
TX 8503L0633D09 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1985-03-14

Could seasonal cotton gins claim an electricity exemption on off-season bills that spread processing-period charges across the year?

Short answer: Yes after reconsideration, if the predominant charge on the off-season bill was attributable to seasonal processing use. The March 14 letter reversed the attached February 22 answer, which had denied exemption for months with no processing.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1985. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1985
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The March 14, 1985 letter expressly reconsidered an earlier answer about cotton gins whose utility rates spread processing-season charges over the rest of the year.

After reconsideration, the Comptroller allowed an exemption on off-season billings when the predominant charge on those bills was attributable to seasonal processing use.

An attached February 22 letter had reached the opposite result. It said the processing exemption applied only in months when processing occurred and when more than 50% of electricity use was for processing, so no exemption applied during the eight or nine off-season months. The later March 14 response is the operative conclusion within this record.

STAR's subject metadata says utility studies were no longer required, but the reproduced letters do not say that. This page therefore records only the reconsidered predominant-charge holding.

Common questions

Did the March letter merely repeat the February answer? No; it expressly reconsidered it. What condition applied to off-season bills? The predominant charge had to be attributable to seasonal processing use. Does the body eliminate utility studies? It does not address that point despite STAR's subject label.

Citations and references

The reproduced letters cite no numbered statute or rule.

Source

Original ruling text

March 14 1985




Dear ***:

We have reconsidered our decision on your inquiry about sales tax
exemption on electricity for certain cotton gins.

The cotton gins located in areas where the utility rates spread in-
season charges over the remainder of the year would be entitled to
claim tax exemption on off season billings provided the predominant
charge of the off season billings is attributable to the seasonal
processing use.

This opinion is based on the facts presented. If there are additional
or different facts, the opinion may change.

If you have any questions or need more information, please call us at
1-800-252-5555 toll free from anywhere in Texas. You may write us at the
Tax Administration Division.

Sincerely,

Tax Policy Section
Tax Administration Division

February 22, 1985




Dear ***:

Thank you for your letter regarding sales tax exemption electricity used
in the ginning of cotton.

Your inquiry concerns the cotton gins in areas where the utility rates
spread in-season charges over the remainder of the year. The demand
charge is assessed each month based on the highest KW of demand recorded
during the processing period (3-4 months). The bills figured for the
other 8-9 months include a demand charge that, in effect, covers service
maintained during the processing period. You contend that the part of
the "off" season bills that represents the processing service charge
(demand) is exempt from sales tax since it actually is part of the charge
for processing power.

The sales tax exemption is for electricity (KWH) used for processing.
Seasonal businesses can claim the exemption only for those months in
which processing occurs and only if the predominant use (over 50%) of
electricity is for processing use.

The fact that the demand charged based on peak KWH usage is leveled and
applied to billings throughout the year does not change the fact that no
processing occurs 8-9 months of the year. Since no processing occurs,
sales tax exemption cannot be claimed for these months.

If you have any questions or need more information, please call us at
1-800-252-5555 toll free from anywhere in Texas. You may write us at the
Tax Administration Division.

Sincerely,

Tax Policy
Tax Administration Division

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1985 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.