🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
TX 200006401L Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 2000-06-12

Is the ink-jet addressing equipment a mailing house uses to address envelopes exempt from tax, and does charging sales tax on a single combined bill for printing and mailing services matter?

Short answer: The ink-jet addresser itself does not qualify for a tax exemption, because it's used to provide a nontaxable mailing service rather than to manufacture a product for sale. But a separately stated charge for addressing items to be mailed is not taxable to the customer — the client was only right to charge tax on its whole bill because it billed printing and mailing as a single, undivided charge.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2000. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2000
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A mailing house that produces advertisements and newsletters for mass mailing — creating the documents, inserting them into envelopes, addressing the envelopes, applying postage, and delivering them to the post office — asked whether its ink-jet addressing equipment qualifies for a sales-tax exemption. It had been charging its client sales tax on the total bill for both the printing and the mailing.

The Comptroller ruled the ink-jet addresser does not qualify for exemption, because that equipment is used to perform a nontaxable mailing service, not to manufacture something for sale. But the ruling also clarified the billing side: the fact that the company charged tax on its whole bill doesn't mean it had to. Charging tax on the full combined bill is only correct if a single, undivided charge is made for both printing and mailing. A charge that is separately stated for addressing items to be mailed is not taxable at all.

What this means for you

Mailing houses and fulfillment companies

The equipment you use to address, insert, or otherwise process mail for a client isn't itself tax-exempt just because the mailing service is nontaxable — you owe tax on your own equipment purchases as the end user. But how you bill your client matters: bundle mailing and taxable printing into one lump-sum charge and the whole thing becomes taxable, while separately stating the mailing/addressing charge keeps that portion out of tax.

Printers who also offer mailing/fulfillment services

If you provide both taxable printing and nontaxable mailing services to the same customer, break the invoice into separate line items for each. A single combined charge pulls the nontaxable mailing service into the taxable base along with the printing.

Accountants and tax professionals

This letter is a compact illustration of Texas's separately-stated-charge rule for mixed taxable/nontaxable transactions: the tax treatment of the bundled charge follows the taxable component unless the nontaxable service is broken out as its own line item.

Common questions

Q: Is equipment used only for mailing services tax-exempt in Texas?
A: No. The ink-jet addresser here didn't qualify for exemption because it's used to provide a nontaxable service (mailing), not to manufacture a product for sale — the business still owes tax on the equipment as the end user.

Q: If mailing services aren't taxable, why would my whole invoice be taxed?
A: Because you billed printing and mailing as one combined, undivided charge. Tax follows the taxable printing portion unless the mailing/addressing charge is separately stated on the invoice.

Q: How do I keep my mailing/addressing charges out of the taxable base?
A: State them as a separate line item on the invoice, distinct from the taxable printing charge.

Source

Original ruling text

June 12, 2000





Dear **:

Thank you for your recent letter concerning the taxability of a jet ink
addresser.

Your client produces advertisements and newsletters for mass mailing. Your
client creates the documents, insert them in envelopes, address the envelopes
and apply postage, as well as deliver them to them to the post office. Your
client charges sales tax on the total bill for products and services provided.

Question: Does the ink jet addresser qualify for exemption?

Answer: The ink jet addresser does not qualify for exemption. This equipment is
used in providing a nontaxable mailing service. The fact that your client
charges sales tax on the total bill is irrelevant. Your client is correct to
charge sales tax on the total bill if a single charge is made for the printing
and mail services. A separately stated charge for addressing items to be mailed
is not taxable.

This opinion is based on the facts presented. If there are additional facts,
the opinion may change.

You may call me toll free at 1-800-531-5441, extension 3-4683, if you have any
questions or need more information. My email address is
. You may write to Tax Policy Division, P.O.
Box 13528, Austin, Texas 78711-3825.

Sincerely,

Eddie C. Washington
Tax Policy Divsion

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2000 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.