🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
TX 200005299L Franchise Tax (PRIOR TO 01/01/2008) 2000-05-12

For the franchise-tax throwback rule on partnership sales, do you look at whether the corporation or the partnership is taxable in the destination state, and does general- versus limited-partner status matter?

Short answer: You look at whether the corporation, not the partnership, is subject to tax in the destination state, and general- versus limited-partner status changes the answer. Addressing the throwback rule for gross receipts from partnership sales, the Comptroller said that in deciding whether the seller is subject to taxation in another state, it looks at whether the corporation (rather than the partnership) is subject to taxation in the state of delivery. For taxable capital, if the corporation does not have nexus in that state, the sales are thrown back as Texas receipts; for earned surplus, if the corporation is not subject to any tax on or measured by net income (regardless of whether such a tax is imposed in the delivery state), the sales are thrown back as Texas receipts. Importantly, a corporation acting as a general partner in a partnership that has nexus in the state of delivery is considered subject to taxation in that state, but a corporation acting as a limited partner in a limited partnership that has nexus in the delivery state is not considered subject to taxation there. See Franchise Tax Rules 3.549(e)(41)(I) and 3.557(e)(37)(I).

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2000. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2000
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. This letter applies the pre-2008 Texas franchise tax and its taxable-capital and earned-surplus throwback rules, which the 2007 legislation (House Bill 3 and House Bill 3928) replaced with the current margin tax effective January 1, 2008; the margin tax apportions receipts under its own rules and does not use this two-component throwback framework, so confirm current law. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A corporation with partnership investments asked how the throwback rule applies to gross receipts from partnership sales - specifically, whether you test the corporation or the partnership for taxability in the destination state.

  • Test the corporation, not the partnership. In deciding whether the seller is subject to taxation in another state, the Comptroller looks at whether the corporation (not the partnership) is subject to tax in the state of delivery.
  • Taxable capital: no nexus -> thrown back. If the corporation has no nexus in the delivery state, the sales are thrown back as Texas receipts.
  • Earned surplus: no net-income tax -> thrown back. If the corporation is not subject to any tax on or measured by net income (regardless of whether such a tax exists in the delivery state), the sales are thrown back as Texas receipts for earned-surplus reporting.
  • General vs. limited partner matters. A corporation acting as a general partner in a partnership with nexus in the delivery state is considered subject to tax there (so no throwback). But a corporation acting as a limited partner in a limited partnership with nexus in the delivery state is not considered subject to tax there (so throwback can apply).
  • Rules. See Franchise Tax Rules 3.549(e)(41)(I) (taxable capital) and 3.557(e)(37)(I) (earned surplus).

Currency note: This 2000 letter applies the pre-2008 franchise tax's two-component throwback rules (replaced by the margin tax effective January 1, 2008 under House Bills 3 and 3928). The margin tax apportions receipts differently; confirm current law.

What this means for you

Corporations investing through partnerships

Whether your out-of-state partnership sales got thrown back to Texas turned on your (the corporation's) taxability in the destination state, not the partnership's - and your role in the partnership was decisive. As a general partner you inherited the partnership's nexus (avoiding throwback); as a limited partner you did not, so those sales could be thrown back to Texas and increase your Texas receipts.

Tax professionals

Two-track test: taxable capital keys on nexus, earned surplus on a net-income tax. And the GP/LP distinction is the operative lever - a corporate LP does not pick up the LP's destination-state taxability, so partnership sales can be thrown back. Cite Rules 3.549(e)(41)(I) / 3.557(e)(37)(I). All pre-2008; re-verify under the margin tax.

Common questions

Q: For partnership sales, do I test the corporation or the partnership for destination-state taxability?
A: The corporation. Texas looks at whether the corporate partner - not the partnership - is subject to tax in the state of delivery.

Q: Does it matter if I'm a general or limited partner?
A: Yes. A corporate general partner in a partnership with nexus in the delivery state is subject to tax there; a corporate limited partner in a limited partnership with nexus there is not.

Q: When are the sales thrown back to Texas?
A: For taxable capital, when the corporation has no nexus in the delivery state; for earned surplus, when the corporation is not subject to any net-income-based tax.

Citations and references

Rules:

  • 34 Tex. Admin. Code Sec. 3.549(e)(41)(I) (Franchise Tax Rule 3.549) - throwback provision for taxable capital
  • 34 Tex. Admin. Code Sec. 3.557(e)(37)(I) (Franchise Tax Rule 3.557) - throwback provision for earned surplus

Source

Original ruling text

May 12, 2000


Email:

Dear **:

Thank you for the follow-up inquiry concerning the throwback rule in the
computation of gross receipts from partnership sales. In determining whether
the seller is subject to taxation in another state for taxable capital
purposes, we look at whether the corporation (rather than the partnership) is
subject to taxation in the state of delivery. If the corporation does not have
nexus in that state, the sales will be thrown back as Texas receipts. If the
corporation (rather than the partnership) is not subject to any tax on or
measured by, net income, without regard to whether the tax is imposed in the
state of delivery, the sales would be thrown back as Texas receipts for earned
surplus reporting.

Please keep in mind that a corporation that acts as a general partner, in a
partnership that has nexus in the state of delivery, will be considered to be
subject to taxation in that state. However, a corporation acting as a limited
partner, in a limited partnership that has nexus in the state of delivery, is
not considered to be subject to taxation in that state.

For more information about the application of the throwback provision, please
see Franchise Tax Rules 3.549(e)(41)(I) and 3.557(e)(37)(I).

This response is based on the facts presented. If there are different or
additional facts, the response may change.

If you have any questions, my internet address is
[email protected], or you may call toll free at 1-800-531-5441,
extension 3-4496.

Sincerely,

Jerry Bobbitt
Tax Policy Division

Dear Mr. Bobbitt:

As for our understanding, when we calculate Franchise Tax, there are two
methods we can choose, Net Profit method and Gross receipts method. For Income
tax, only gross receipts profit method is allowed. Our company have several
partnership investments and when we try to apply throw back rule in calculating
gross receipts we got two questions:

Q1. For Franchise tax ,when we calculate gross receipts for the partnership
sales, should we throw back those sales in states where our company did not
have salesmen visited or throw back those sales in states where our partnership
did not have salesmen visited?

Q2. For Income tax , when we calculate gross receipts for the partnership
sales, should we throw back those sales in states where our company did not pay
income tax or throw back those sales in states where our partnership did not
pay income tax?

Please email me the relevant regulations for the answers to back up our state
return calculation. Your prompt reply will be appreciated.


Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2000 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.