🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
SC SC Revenue Ruling #97-20 Sales Tax 1997-12-17

When did RR 97-20 treat a local fee or tax as part of gross proceeds subject to South Carolina state sales tax?

Short answer: A local hospitality tax or qualifying local accommodations fee was included in gross proceeds when imposed on the retailer and passed through as the retailer's receipt. It was excluded when imposed on the customer and collected in trust. Local accommodations, local option, capital-projects, and transportation-projects sales taxes were excluded either way.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1997. Ezel answers yours, under current South Carolina tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1997
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: SC Revenue Ruling #97-20 superseded RR #96-8 and interpreted local-fee and sales-tax statutes in effect in 1997. Tax rates, local taxing authority, and the identity of the legally liable party may have changed. Later Department rulings cited its retailer-versus-customer distinction, but current treatment must be verified for the specific charge and ordinance. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

South Carolina Revenue Ruling 97-20 explained when adding a city or county charge to a bill also increased the amount subject to state sales tax.

For a local hospitality tax or a qualifying local accommodations fee imposed before March 15, 1997, the answer depended on who legally owed the charge. If the charge was imposed on the retailer, an amount recovered from the customer was the retailer's receipt and the payment to the local government was the retailer's expense. It therefore entered gross proceeds and was subject to state sales tax. If the charge was imposed on the customer and the retailer merely collected it in trust for the city or county, it was not the retailer's receipt and was excluded from gross proceeds.

Four categories were excluded from the state sales-tax base regardless of whether described as imposed on the retailer or customer: the statutory local accommodations tax, local option sales tax, local capital-projects sales tax, and local transportation-projects sales tax. The ruling reasoned that these taxes were required to use the same sales-tax base or accommodations-tax base as the corresponding state tax, so one tax was not included in the base for calculating the other.

The ruling superseded SC Revenue Ruling 96-8. Later Department rulings on telecommunications charges quoted its basic distinction between a provider's own expense recovery and a government charge collected from the customer.

Charge-by-charge result

  • Local hospitality tax: included if imposed on the retailer; excluded if imposed on the customer with the retailer acting as collection agent.
  • Pre-March 15, 1997 local accommodations fee authorized by Act 138 of 1997: the same retailer-versus-customer test applied.
  • Statutory local accommodations tax: excluded from gross proceeds either way.
  • Local option, capital-projects, and transportation-projects sales taxes: excluded from gross proceeds either way.

Common questions

Q: Did separately stating a retailer's own local tax expense remove it from gross proceeds? No. The ruling treated recovery of a retailer-imposed charge as a receipt of the retailer and the remittance as an expense.

Q: Why was a customer-imposed tax different? The retailer held the amount in trust as a collection agent for the local government, so it was the government's receipt rather than the retailer's.

Q: Did the ruling say state sales tax should be charged on local option sales tax? No. Local option, capital-projects, and transportation-projects sales taxes were not included in the state sales-tax base.

Q: Are the listed statutes and fee categories current? This page reports the classifications in the 1997 ruling. Current law and the ordinance imposing a particular charge must be checked.

Citations and references

  • S.C. Code Ann. §§ 12-36-910 and 12-36-920 (state sales and accommodations taxes)
  • S.C. Code Ann. § 12-36-90 (gross proceeds)
  • S.C. Code Ann. §§ 6-1-500 et seq. and 6-1-700 et seq. (local accommodations and hospitality taxes)
  • S.C. Code Ann. §§ 4-10-10 et seq., 4-10-300 et seq., and 4-37-30 et seq. (local option, capital-projects, and transportation-projects sales taxes)
  • Section 10 of Act 138 of 1997 (identified local accommodations fees)
  • Meyers Arnold v. South Carolina Tax Commission, 285 S.C. 303, 328 S.E.2d 920 (1985) (gross-proceeds principle cited)

Subject

Local Fees and Taxes

Source

Original ruling text

State of South Carolina

Department of Revenue
301 Gervais Street, P. O. Box 125, Columbia, South Carolina 29214

SC REVENUE RULING #97-20 (TAX)

SUBJECT:

Local Fees and Taxes
(Sales Tax)

EFFECTIVE DATE:

Applies to all periods open under the statute.

SUPERSEDES:

SC Revenue Ruling #96-8

REFERENCE:

S.C. Code Ann. Section 12-36-910 (Supp. 1996)
S.C. Code Ann. Section 12-36-920 (Supp. 1996)
S.C. Code Ann. Section 12-36-90 (Supp. 1996)

AUTHORITY:

S.C. Code Ann. Section 12-4-320 (Supp. 1996)
SC Revenue Procedure #97-8

SCOPE:

A Revenue Ruling is the Department of Revenue's official advisory
opinion of how laws administered by the Department are to be applied
to a specific issue or a specific set of facts, and is provided as guidance
for all persons or a particular group. It is valid and remains in effect
until superseded or modified by a change in the statute or regulations or
a subsequent court decision, Revenue Ruling or Revenue Procedure.

Question:
Are the following local fees and taxes includable in "gross proceeds of sales" and subject to the
state sales tax?
(1)

local accommodations taxes authorized under Code Section 6-1-500 et. seq. These are
taxes derived from the rental or charges for accommodations furnished to transients and
are collected by the local governments (municipalities or counties) imposing the tax.

(2)

local hospitality taxes authorized under Code Section 6-1-700 et. seq. These are taxes on
the sales of prepared meals and beverages and are collected by the local governments
(municipalities or counties) imposing the tax.

(3)

local option sales taxes authorized under Code Section 4-10-10 et. seq. These taxes are
general sales taxes on all sales at retail (with a few exceptions) taxable under the state
sales tax. These taxes are imposed specifically to reduce the property tax burden on
persons in the counties that impose this type of local tax and are collected by the
Department of Revenue on behalf of these counties.

1

(4)

local capital projects sales taxes authorized under Code Section 4-10-300 et. seq. These
taxes are general sales taxes on all sales at retail (with a few exceptions) taxable under
the state sales tax. These taxes are imposed specifically to defray the debt service on
bonds issued for various capital projects in the counties that impose this type of local tax
and are collected by the Department of Revenue on behalf of these counties.

(5)

local transportation projects sales taxes authorized under Code Section 4-37-30 et. seq.
These taxes are general sales taxes on all sales at retail (with a few exceptions) taxable
under the state sales tax. These taxes are imposed specifically to defray the debt service
on bonds issued for various transportation projects in the counties that impose this type
of local tax and are collected by the Department of Revenue on behalf of these counties.

(6)

local accommodations fees imposed by ordinance prior to March 15, 1997 and
authorized under Section 10 of Act 138 of 1997. These are fees derived from the rental
or charges for accommodations furnished to transients and are collected by the local
government imposing the fee.

Conclusions:
The following local fees and taxes are includable in "gross proceeds of sales" and subject to the
state sales tax if the fee or tax is imposed upon the retailer:
(1)

local hospitality taxes authorized under code section 6-1-700 et. seq.; and,

(2)

local accommodations fees imposed by ordinance prior to March 15, 1997 and
authorized under Section 10 of Act 138 of 1997.

The following local fees and taxes are not includable in "gross proceeds of sales" and not subject
to the state sales tax if the fee or tax is imposed upon the customer and the retailer is merely a
collection agent for the city or county:
(1)

local hospitality taxes authorized under code section 6-1-700 et. seq.; and,

(2)

local accommodations fees imposed by ordinance prior to March 15, 1997 and
authorized under Section 10 of Act 138 of 1997.

The following local fees and taxes are not includable in "gross proceeds of sales" and not subject
to the state sales tax, whether the fee or tax is imposed on the retailer or the customer:
(1)

local accommodations taxes authorized under Code Section 6-1-500 et. seq.;

(2)

local option sales taxes authorized under Code Section 4-10-10 et. seq.;

(3)

local capital projects sales taxes authorized under Code Section 4-10-300 et. seq.; and,

2

(4)

local transportation projects sales taxes authorized under Code Section 4-37-30 et. seq.
Facts:

Cities and counties are now imposing fees and taxes upon businesses that sell food and beverages
or furnish sleeping accommodations for a fee. These fees and taxes are generally calculated as a
percentage of the gross proceeds of sales of the foods and beverages or gross proceeds derived
from accommodations. Such businesses are usually required to collect these fees or taxes from
their customers, but are still required to remit the fees or taxes to the city or county if they fail to
collect it from their customers.
Counties are also imposing various types of local general sales and use taxes. These taxes are
collected by the Department of Revenue on behalf of the counties imposing these taxes.
Questions have arisen as to whether these fees or taxes are includable in the gross proceeds of
sales and, therefore, subject to the state sales tax.
Discussion:
Code Section 12-36-910 imposes "a sales tax, equal to five percent of gross proceeds of sales,
upon every person engaged ... within this State in the business of selling tangible personal
property at retail." (Emphasis added.)
Code Section 12-36-920(A) imposes "a sales tax equal to seven percent on the gross proceeds
derived from rental or charges for any rooms, campground spaces, lodgings, or sleeping
accommodations furnished to transients by any hotel, inn, tourist court, tourist camp, motel,
campground, residence, or any place in which rooms, lodgings, or sleeping accommodations are
furnished to transients for a consideration." (Emphasis added.)
Code Section 12-36-90 defines "gross proceeds" and reads, in part:
Gross proceeds of sales, or any similar term, means the value proceeding or
accruing from the sale, lease, or rental of tangible personal property.
(1)

The term includes:


(b)

the proceeds from the sale of tangible personal property without any deduction
for:
(i)

the cost of goods sold;

(ii)

the cost of materials, labor, or service;

(iii) interest paid;
(iv) losses;

3

(v)

transportation costs;

(vi) manufacturers or importers excise taxes imposed by the United States; or
(vii) any other expenses.
In Meyers Arnold v. South Carolina Tax Commission, 285 S.C. 303, 328 S.E. 2d. 920 (1985), the
Court of Appeals, in interpreting the definition of "gross proceeds of sales" with respect to lay
away fees paid in conjunction with lay away sales, held:
Section 12-35-30 [now Section 12-36-90] defines gross proceeds of sales as "the value
proceeding or accruing from the sale of tangible personal property ... without any
deduction for service costs." But for the lay away sales, Meyers Arnold would not receive
the lay away fees. The fees are obviously rendered in making lay away sales. For these
reasons, this court holds the lay away fees are part of the gross proceeds of sales and
subject to the sales tax.
The Commissioners, in Decision S-D-174, held a property damage waiver fee charged by a person
engaged in the business of renting tangible personal property was subject to the sales tax. The
Commission, in citing Meyers Arnold v. South Carolina Tax Commission, supra, stated:
Just as in Meyers Arnold, supra, the service fee here is taxable. But for the lease of
tangible personal property, the taxpayer would not have received the fee. The fee is
obviously charged for the additional service of providing a lease of property free from
liability for damage. In the absence of such service, the lessee, under the taxpayer's lease
agreements, would be "liable for any loss, theft, damage or destruction of leased property."
We find and conclude the fee for the property damage waiver is part of gross proceeds of
sale subject to tax.
In Decision S-D-127, the Commissioners held that "the amount in a lease contract equal to ad
valorem taxes which is paid annually by the lessee to the lessor is includable in gross proceeds of
sales."
Finally, the following additional issues must be considered when determining if local fees and
taxes are includable in “gross proceeds of sales” for purposes of the state sales tax:
(1)

Is the local government fee or tax imposed on the retailer or the consumer?

(2)

Is the fee or tax, by state law, administered in the same manner as the state sales and use
tax?

With respect to the first issue, a distinction must be made between local fees or taxes that are
imposed upon the retailer and local fees or taxes that are imposed upon the customer. With
respect to fees and taxes imposed upon the customer, the retailer is merely a collection agent for
the local government that has enacted the fee or tax by ordinance. As such, the fee or tax the
retailer is required to collect and hold in trust for the local government is not a receipt of the
retailer. It is a receipt of the local government for whom the retailer is the collection agent.

4

Therefore, local fees and taxes imposed upon the retailer's customers are not includable in "gross
proceeds of sales."
A fee or tax imposed upon the retailer is a receipt of the retailer. The retailer has the discretion to
collect the fee or tax from his customer, but he is not required to do so. As such, the fee or tax
when collected is a receipt of the retailer. When paid to the local government, the fee or tax is an
expense of the retailer. Therefore, local fees and taxes imposed upon the retailer are includable in
"gross proceeds of sales."
Therefore, city and county fees and taxes, when imposed on the retailer, are part of gross proceeds
of sales and therefore subject to the sales tax. City and county fees and taxes, when imposed on
the consumer, are not a part of gross proceeds of sales and therefore not subject to the sales tax.

With respect to the second issue, local option sales and use taxes administered and collected by
the Department of Revenue are not included in the basis for calculating the state sales and use tax.
By statute, these local option sales and use taxes must be administered and collected in the same
manner as the state sales and use tax. As such, these local option sales and use taxes must have,
among other things, the same exemptions and exclusions, the same definitions, and the same
“gross proceeds of sales” and “sales price” as the state sales and use tax.
In addition, the local accommodations taxes authorized under Code Section 6-1-500 et. seq. is not
included in the basis for calculating the state sales and use tax. This tax, while collected by the
local government, must be “derived from the rental or charges for accommodations furnished to
transients as provided in Section 12-36-920(A).” As stated earlier, Code Section 12-36-920(A)
imposes a state Asales tax equal to seven percent on the gross proceeds derived from rental or
charges for any rooms, campground spaces, lodgings, or sleeping accommodations furnished to
transients by any hotel, inn, tourist court, tourist camp, motel, campground, residence, or any
place in which rooms, lodgings, or sleeping accommodations are furnished to transients for a
consideration." By statute, this local accommodations tax must be administered and collected in
the same manner as the state sales tax on accommodations. As such, the local accommodations
tax authorized under Code Section 6-1-500 et. seq. must have the same “gross proceeds of sales”
as the state sales tax on accommodations.
Therefore, local option sales and use tax administered and collected by the Department of
Revenue and the local accommodations taxes authorized under Code Section 6-1-500 et. seq. are
not includable in “gross proceeds of sales” and “sales price” for purposes of the state sales and use
tax and the state sales and use tax is not includable in “gross proceeds of sales” and “sales price”
for purposes of these local sales and use taxes.
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
S/Burnett R. Maybank III
Burnet R. Maybank, III, Director
Columbia, South Carolina
December 17
, 1997

5

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1997 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current South Carolina tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.