🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
SC SC Revenue Ruling #87-1 Sales and Use Tax 1986-12-16

Was the transfer of South Carolina motor vehicles to a newly formed corporation by its principal stockholder exempt from the state's title excise tax?

Short answer: Yes. Although the statute literally exempted only a transfer to a principal stockholder, RR 87-1 held the legislature intended to exempt motor vehicles transferred by a principal stockholder to a corporation upon that corporation's formation, so the 5% title excise tax did not apply.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1986. Ezel answers yours, under current South Carolina tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1986
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: HISTORICAL sales/use-tax guidance with a December 16, 1986 effective date, republishing Sales and Use Tax Ruling 86-1. It relied on the title excise-tax provisions of former S.C. Code § 12-35-1710 as then in effect. South Carolina's sales, use, and casual-excise (titling) tax statutes have since been amended and renumbered, and rates and exemptions may differ today. A Revenue Ruling is the Department's position only until superseded or modified by a change in statute, regulation, court decision, or later advisory opinion. Verify current law before relying on this result. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

South Carolina Revenue Ruling 87-1 addressed the state's excise tax on the issuance of a certificate of title for motor vehicles — a 5% tax under former Section 12-35-1710(A) that applied when no sales or use tax had been paid on the transaction requiring the transfer.

The facts involved a corporate reorganization. "XYZ" Corporation was formed in May 1986 as a wholly owned subsidiary of "ABC" Corporation. In July 1986, ABC transferred its operating assets — including motor vehicles located in South Carolina — to XYZ. The question was whether the title excise tax applied to those vehicles.

The statute contained an exemption at Section 12-35-1710(A)(1)(C) for a vehicle "transferred from an individual to a partnership upon formation of a partnership, or to a principal stockholder upon formation of a corporation." Read literally, that language would exempt only a transfer to a principal stockholder, not a transfer by the stockholder to the new corporation. The Commission found that reading illogical and contrary to the legislature's intent. It ruled that the legislature meant to exempt transfers made by a principal stockholder to a corporation upon the organization of that corporation. On these facts, the vehicles ABC moved to its new subsidiary were exempt from the excise tax.

Common questions

Q: What tax was at issue? The 5% excise tax on issuing a certificate of title for a motor vehicle (and boats, motors, and airplanes) when no sales or use tax had been paid on the underlying transfer.

Q: What did the exemption literally say? It exempted a vehicle transferred to a principal stockholder upon formation of a corporation.

Q: How did the Commission read it? As also exempting a vehicle transferred by a principal stockholder to the corporation upon the corporation's organization, to match the legislature's intent.

Q: Were the vehicles moved to the new subsidiary taxable? No. Under the Commission's reading, the transfer to the newly formed corporation qualified for the exemption.

Citations and references

  • S.C. Code Ann. § 12-35-1710(A) (5% title/casual excise tax when no sales or use tax was paid)
  • S.C. Code Ann. § 12-35-1710(A)(1)(C) (exemption on formation of a corporation)
  • Republishes Sales and Use Tax Ruling 86-1 (Dec. 16, 1986)

Subject

Transfers of Tangible Personal Property Pursuant to the Formation of a Corporation

Source

Original ruling text

SC REVENUE RULING #87-1

SUBJECT:

Transfers of Tangible Personal Property
Pursuant to the Formation of a Corporation

EFFECTIVE DATE:

December 16, 1986

REFERENCE:

Section 12-35-1710, South Carolina Code of Laws 1976, as
amended

AUTHORITY

Sections 12-3-120, 12-3-140 and 12-3-170, South Carolina Code of
Laws of 1976, as amended

SCOPE:

A Revenue Ruling is the Commission's official interpretation of how tax
law is to be applied to a specific set of facts. A Revenue Ruling is
public information and remains a permanent document until superseded
by a Regulation or is rescinded by a subsequent Revenue Ruling.

PURPOSE:

This policy statement is issued to publish Sales and Use Tax Ruling 86-1
as issued by the Tax Commission

Facts:
"XYZ" Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of "ABC" Corporation, was formed in May
1986, to become the operating subsidiary "ABC" Corporation. In July 1986, items of personal
property constituting the operating assets of "ABC" Corporation, were transferred to "XYZ"
Corporation. Real property relating to the operating assets was transferred by "ABC"
Corporation, to "XYZ" Corporation, in October 1986. Among the items of personal property
transferred by ABC Corporation to XYZ Corporation, were motor vehicles which are located in
South Carolina.
Law:
Section 12-35-1710(A), as amended, imposes a 5 percent excise tax "for the issuance of every
certificate of title or other proof of ownership for every motor vehicle, motorcycle, boat, motor,
or airplane which is required to be registered, titled, and licensed by law upon which no sales or
use tax has been paid on the transaction necessitating the transfer."

1

Section 12-35-1710(A) (1) (C) excludes from the excise tax those motor vehicles which are:
"Transferred from an individual to a partnership upon formation of a partnership, or to a
principal stockholder upon formation of a corporation."
Conclusion:
A literal reading of Section 12-35-1710 (A) (1) (C) would only exempt from the tax a transfer
from an individual to a principal stockholder upon the formation of a corporation. We find such
to be an illogical conclusion which does not reach the legislative intent. We, there- fore, rule that
it was the intent of the legislature to exempt from the tax transfers made by a principal
stockholder to a corporation upon the organization of such corporation. (Dec. 16, 1986)

2

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1986 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current South Carolina tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.