New York Advisory Opinion TSB-H-80(524)I: Can a taxpayer claim New York's personal income tax tuition modification for tuition paid on behalf of his spouse?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1981. Ezel answers yours, under current New York tax law, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Michael A. Badeau paid tuition for his wife's full-time attendance at an institution of higher education and asked whether he could subtract that tuition from his income under New York's personal income tax.
Tax Law section 612(c)(17) allows a subtraction for tuition paid "on behalf of each dependent" for full-time attendance at a college or university - so the whole question turned on whether a spouse counts as a "dependent" under that provision. Section 607(a) instructs that terms used in Article 22 carry the same meaning as in comparable federal income tax law, unless a different meaning is clearly required. Federal law's definition of "dependent" (26 U.S.C. section 152) lists nine specific qualifying relationships to the taxpayer (based on more than half support), and marriage isn't among them - in fact, the statute expressly carves a taxpayer's spouse out of even the broader "member of the taxpayer's household" category that would otherwise cover a dependent living with the taxpayer.
Because New York's tuition subtraction borrows the federal definition of "dependent," and that definition specifically excludes a spouse, tuition Badeau paid on his wife's behalf couldn't be the basis for the section 612(c)(17) subtraction.
What this means for you
Married taxpayers paying a spouse's tuition
Tuition you pay for your spouse's own college education doesn't qualify for New York's tuition subtraction - the subtraction is limited to tuition paid for a true "dependent" (children or other qualifying relatives you support), and a spouse is specifically excluded from that category under the federal definition New York borrows.
Anyone assuming "dependent" includes a spouse for tax purposes
Don't conflate a spouse with a "dependent" - federal tax law (which New York's tuition provision incorporates) treats them as legally distinct categories, even though a couple may file jointly and support each other financially.
Accountants preparing returns with education expenses
Confirm the relationship of the tuition-paying taxpayer to the student before claiming this subtraction; it's available for a genuine dependent under the federal section 152 definition, not for a spouse's own education costs.
Common questions
Q: Can I deduct tuition I pay for my spouse's college classes on my New York return?
A: No - New York's tuition subtraction applies only to a "dependent," and federal law (which New York borrows for this term) specifically excludes a spouse from that category.
Q: Why does New York use the federal definition of "dependent" for this subtraction?
A: Tax Law section 607(a) provides that Article 22 terms carry the same meaning as comparable federal tax law unless the statute clearly requires otherwise, and nothing in section 612(c)(17) suggested a different meaning was intended here.
Q: Would tuition paid for my child qualify instead?
A: This ruling doesn't address that directly, but its reasoning implies that tuition paid for someone who does meet the federal "dependent" definition (such as a qualifying child or other relative you support) would be evaluated differently than tuition paid for a spouse.
Source
- Landing page: https://www.tax.ny.gov/pubs_and_bulls/advisory_opinions/income_ao_1980.htm
- Opinion: https://www.tax.ny.gov/pdf/advisory_opinions/income/h80_524i.pdf
Original ruling text
New York State Department of Taxation and Finance
TSB-H-80-(524)-I
Income Tax
February 2, 1981
Taxpayer Services Division
Technical Services Bureau
STATE OF NEW YORK
STATE TAX COMMISSION
ADVISORY OPINION
PETITION NO. I800916B
On September 16, 1980, a Petition for Advisory Opinion was received from
Michael A. Badeau, 204 Mason Drive, Syracuse, New York 13219.
The issue raised is whether a taxpayer is entitled to a modification, under
the Personal Income Tax imposed under Article 22 of the Tax Law, based on the
payment of tuition expenses on behalf of his spouse.
Section 6ll(a) of the Tax Law provides that a taxpayer's New York adjusted
gross income, the starting point in determining his New York taxable income, is
equal to his Federal adjusted gross income as modified by certain specified
additions and subtractions. Section 612(c)(17) provides for such a subtraction
based on the amount of tuition paid during the taxable year "...on behalf of each
dependent for full-time attendance at an institution of higher education...." The
dispositive question here, then, is whether a taxpayer's spouse may be his
"dependent" with the meaning of section 612(c)(17)of the Tax Law.
Section 607(a) of the Tax Law provides that terms used in Article 22 of the
Tax Law "...shall have the same meaning as when used in a comparable context in
the laws of the United States relating to federal income taxes unless a different
meaning is clearly required...." Federal law defines the term "dependent," for
income tax purposes, in section 152 of the Internal Revenue Code. A dependent of
a taxpayer is there described as an individual over half of whose support during
a taxable year is received from the taxpayer and who bears any of nine specified
relationships to the taxpayer. The relationship of marriage is not included in
any of these categories, and indeed, the spouse of a taxpayer is explicitly
excluded from the category of any individual "...who, for the taxable year of the
taxpayer, has as his principal place of abode the home of the taxpayer and is a
member of the taxpayer's household." 26 USCA §152(a)(9).
Accordingly, the term "dependent" as used in section 612(c)(17) of the Tax
Law does not include a taxpayer's spouse and tuition payments made on behalf of
such spouse may not be made the basis of a modification under such provision of
law.
DATED: December 2,1980
TP-80 (4/80)
s/LOUIS ETLINGER
Deputy Director
Technical Services Bureau
JAMES H. TULLY, JR., COMMISSIONER
LOUIS M. JACOBSON, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
FRANK J. PUCCIA, DIRECTOR
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read a 1981 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current New York tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.