🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
NY TSB-A-93(1)R Real Estate Transfer Tax; Real Property Transfer Gains Tax; Mortgage Recording Tax 1993-01-07

As fee owner of our Manhattan office tower, we need to convey the condo units occupied by a major tenant to the NYC Industrial Development Agency so the tenant can get IDA financing benefits, then lease those units back from the IDA and sublease to the tenant -- with the IDA's title later reverting to us, possibly repeatedly as the deal is restructured. Does any of this trigger Real Estate Transfer Tax, Real Property Transfer Gains Tax, or Mortgage Recording Tax?

Short answer: Exempt across the board. The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., fee owner of One New York Plaza, needed to convey condominium units occupied by tenant Prudential Securities Incorporated (PSI) to the New York City Industrial Development Agency (IDA) so PSI could secure IDA financing and tax benefits, with the IDA leasing the units back to Chase at nominal rent and Chase subleasing to PSI. The Department held that the original conveyance, any later reconveyance following an early termination of the IDA's title, and any additional conveyance for expansion space are all exempt from both RETT and gains tax, because Chase (though not the financing beneficiary) retained all the benefits and burdens of ownership of the units throughout. The IDA-Chase lease and the Chase-Prudential sublease were also exempt, each running under 49 years with no purchase option. Finally, none of these title-shuffling transactions triggered Mortgage Recording Tax, because a deed conveying title 'solely for the purpose of transferring title' -- not as security for a debt -- isn't a mortgage under Tax Law § 250 and controlling case law (Macy & Co. v. Bates).

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1993. Ezel answers yours, under current New York tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1993
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official New York State Department of Taxation and Finance Advisory Opinion (TSB-A), issued at a taxpayer's request. It is limited to the facts set forth in it and binds the Department only with respect to the petitioner to whom it was issued, and only if that petitioner fully and accurately described all relevant facts; another taxpayer cannot rely on it. It reflects the law, regulations, and Department policy in effect when issued and may since have changed. The Real Property Transfer Gains Tax discussed in this opinion was repealed for transfers occurring on or after June 15, 1996 and no longer applies; the Real Estate Transfer Tax and Mortgage Recording Tax rules discussed remain current law. A follow-up opinion on the same petition, TSB-A-93(1.1)R (issued about a month later), refines these facts to address phased conveyances and broadens the ruling to cover Chase's affiliates, nominees, successors, and assigns: consult that opinion alongside this one. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed New York tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. owned One New York Plaza, a roughly 2.4-million-square-foot, 50-floor Manhattan office building. It planned to lease about 1,000,000 square feet to Prudential Securities Incorporated (PSI). To help PSI capture city tax and financing benefits through the New York City Industrial Development Agency (IDA), Chase needed to convert the building into condominium units (generally one per floor) and convey the units PSI would occupy to the IDA for no consideration (the "Original Conveyance"). The IDA would then net-lease those units back to Chase at nominal or no rent (the "IDA-Chase Lease"), and Chase would sublease the same space to PSI (the "Chase-Prudential Lease") for negotiated rent, with PSI separately obtaining IDA financing benefits.

The structure was designed to be dynamic: the IDA's title to any unit would automatically end on a set future date, or earlier upon specified triggering events (an "IDA Title Termination," called a "Pre-Date Termination" if early) -- for example, if the Chase-Prudential lease ended, if PSI's PILOT (payment-in-lieu-of-tax) obligations weren't met, or at the IDA's or Chase's election under certain circumstances. After any such termination, Chase could later reconvey the same or other units back to the IDA to restart the arrangement, including for units covering PSI's future expansion-space options. Some units might also carry mortgages Chase placed on its own interest, and Chase would remain the party ultimately liable for repaying any such debt (the IDA's title would not itself carry mortgage liability back to Chase on reversion).

The Department worked through five questions and reached the same exempt result the companion Resnick Water St. ruling reached the same month:

  1. The Original Conveyance, any reconveyance after a Pre-Date Termination, and conveyances for expansion space are all exempt from RETT and gains tax. Even though Chase (unlike the typical IDA-exemption scenario) wasn't itself the beneficiary of the IDA financing, Chase retained all the benefits and burdens of ownership of the units throughout, so beneficial ownership never actually shifted -- the Department extended the IDA exemption to reach this non-beneficiary-owner structure.
  2. A Pre-Date Termination (reversion to Chase) is likewise exempt, for the same reason -- no change in beneficial ownership.
  3. The IDA-Chase Lease, in all its iterations (original creation, recreation after a termination, or extension for expansion space) is exempt, because Chase -- though not the IDA-financing beneficiary -- was the beneficial owner of the property throughout.
  4. The Chase-Prudential Lease, running under 49 years including renewals and containing no purchase option, is exempt under the ordinary lease/sublease rules.
  5. None of these transactions trigger Mortgage Recording Tax. A deed that only transfers title -- without securing a debt or obligation, without a right to foreclose, and without a reciprocal right to redeem -- isn't a "mortgage" under Tax Law § 250, per Macy & Co. v. Bates. Since these conveyances were given only to transfer title (not as loan collateral), no mortgage tax applies. (The opinion notes it does NOT address any separate mortgage Chase itself might place on its leasehold or reversionary interest.)

What this means for you

Commercial landlords structuring IDA financing for a major tenant, especially with a dynamic/repeating conveyance structure

The IDA exemption reaches a non-beneficiary fee owner's conveyance-leaseback-reversion cycle even when it repeats multiple times (original conveyance, early termination, reconveyance, expansion-space conveyances) -- as long as the owner keeps every real economic incident of ownership at each step. This is a companion origin case to Resnick Water St. TSB-A-93(2)R, issued the same month for a similar structure at a different Manhattan building.

Parties relying on title-transferring deeds that are not loan security

A deed stated to convey title only (not as security for a debt) is definitionally not a "mortgage," so no Mortgage Recording Tax attaches -- a principle that recurs throughout later IDA/synthetic-lease rulings in this vein.

Accountants and tax professionals

Read this opinion together with its refinement, TSB-A-93(1.1)R, issued about a month later on the same petition -- the later opinion adds detail about phased conveyances tied to construction milestones and broadens coverage to Chase's affiliates, nominees, successors, and assigns, without changing the exempt conclusions reached here.

Common questions

Q: Does a non-beneficiary landlord's IDA conveyance for a tenant's benefit trigger transfer tax?
A: Not if the landlord retains all the real benefits and burdens of ownership throughout -- the exemption isn't limited to the actual beneficiary of the IDA financing.

Q: Does Mortgage Recording Tax apply to these IDA title transfers?
A: No. A deed conveying title only (not as security for a debt, with no foreclosure/redemption rights) is not a "mortgage" under Tax Law § 250.

Q: Is the Real Property Transfer Gains Tax analysis in this ruling still relevant?
A: No, it was repealed for transfers on or after June 15, 1996. The RETT and mortgage tax analyses remain current.

Q: Can I rely on this ruling for my own IDA financing transaction?
A: No. This advisory opinion binds the Department only as to the petitioner and the specific facts described -- and note the follow-up opinion TSB-A-93(1.1)R refines these facts further.

Citations and references

Statutes, regulations, and case law:

  • Section 590.5 of the Gains Tax Regulations (lease/sublease as a transfer; 49-year and 90%-of-premises tests)
  • Section 590.67 of the Gains Tax Regulations (IDA project transfers)
  • Section 575.7 of the Transfer Tax Regulations (taxable lease/sublease creation)
  • Section 575.11 of the Transfer Tax Regulations (examples of taxable/exempt IDA conveyances)
  • Section 250 of the Tax Law (definition of "mortgage")
  • Macy & Co. v. Bates, 280 App. Div. 292 (a mortgage requires a debt/obligation, a right to foreclose, and a reciprocal right to redeem)

Source

Original ruling text

New York State Department of Taxation and Finance

Taxpayer Services Division
Technical Services Bureau

TSB-A-93 (1)R
Real Property
Transfer Gains Tax
Real Estate Transfer Tax
January 7, 1993

STATE OF NEW YORK
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION AND FINANCE
ADVISORY OPINION

PETITION NO. M921207B

On December 7, 1992, a Petition for Advisory Opinion was received from The Chase
Manhattan Bank, N.A., Real Estate Resources, 4 Chase MetroTech Center, Brooklyn, New York
11245.
The issues raised by Petitioner, The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., are:

  1. Whether the conveyance of title to a condominium unit or units by Petitioner to the New
    York City Industrial Development Agency in connection with the Original Conveyance, in
    connection with a new conveyance following a Pre-Date Termination, in connection with Prudential
    Securities Incorporated and affiliate (hereinafter "Prudential") lease of additional space or any similar
    conveyance, will be subject to New York State Real Property Transfer Gains Tax (hereinafter the
    "gains tax") or New York State Real Estate Transfer Tax (hereinafter the "transfer tax").
  2. Whether an IDA Title Termination (including reversion of fee title to the IDA units to
    Petitioner) with respect to any or all of the IDA condominium units, will be subject to gains tax or
    transfer tax.
  3. Whether the creation of the IDA-Petitioner lease or portion thereof whether in connection
    with its original creation, in connection with a new conveyance following a Pre-Date Termination,
    in connection with Prudential's lease of additional space or the termination of the IDA-Petitioner
    lease or portion thereof upon the expiration of its term or upon an IDA Title Termination with
    respect to any or all of the IDA Units, or any similar creation or termination, will be subject to gains
    tax or transfer tax.
  4. Whether the creation of the Petitioner-Prudential Lease or portion thereof in connection
    with the original conveyance, in connection with a new conveyance following a Pre-Date
    Termination or in connection with Prudential's lease of additional space will be subject to gains tax
    or transfer tax.
  5. Whether any of the transactions described herein between Petitioner and the IDA will
    result in the imposition of any New York State or New York City mortgage recording tax.
    Petitioner currently owns the fee interest in the parcel located in the Borough of Manhattan,
    City, County and State of New York, identified on the tax maps as Block 4, Lot 1 (the "Land") upon
    which is located the building having the street address One New York Plaza, New York, New York
    (the "Building"). (The Land and the Building together are hereafter referred to as the "Property").
    The Building, which is owned by Petitioner, was completed in approximately 1970 and is comprised
    of approximately 2,400,000 feet of commercial space located on approximately 50 floors.

-2­
TSB-A-93 (1)R
Real Property
Transfer Gains Tax
Real Estate Transfer Tax
January 7, 1993
The basic economic transaction is a lease by Petitioner to Prudential for the use of
approximately 1,000,000 square feet in the Building. This space will generally consist of the rentable
areas on the second through sixteenth floors of the Building plus miscellaneous areas located
elsewhere in the Building, including without limitation areas on the ground floor and on the first
Concourse level.
In connection with this lease, Petitioner has been informed that it will be necessary for
Petitioner to transfer to the New York City Industrial Development Agency (the "IDA") title to the
portion of the property occupied by Prudential. As part of the arrangement to induce Prudential to
retain its offices in New York City, it is anticipated the New York City (the "City") will extend
substantial tax and other benefits (the "Benefits") to reduce Prudential's costs of operating and
maintaining its offices in the City. In this connection, it is expected that Prudential will obtain IDA
financing from the IDA and other Benefits by entering into a sub-sublease with the IDA, which will
sub-sub-sublease the space back to Prudential. It is anticipated that an additional Benefit, however,
will be the arrangement for a real estate tax abatement on the space to be occupied by Prudential,
with the agreement that certain payments in lieu of real estate taxes ("PILOT Payments") will be
made. Petitioner has been informed that as a technical matter, the only way for such real estate tax
Benefits (and perhaps some of the other Benefits) to be extended is for the IDA to take title to the
real property to be occupied by Prudential. This will necessitate that Petitioner transfer to the IDA
title to the portion of the Property to be occupied by Prudential, which portion the IDA will lease
back to Petitioner.
The IDA will not take title to the entire Property. Instead, a condominium will be created at
the Property pursuant to which, in general, each floor will become a separate condominium unit. The
units to be occupied by Prudential will be conveyed by Petitioner to the IDA. The Units which are
from time to time owned by the IDA are herein referred to as the "IDA Units" The remaining Units
in the Building which from time to time are not IDA Units are herein referred to as the "Petitioner's
Units".
The proposed structure will be implemented as follows:
1.

Separate condominium units will be created pursuant to a Declaration of
Condominium.

2.

Petitioner will convey title to the IDA of the initial units comprising the IDA Units
for no consideration (the "Original Conveyance").

3.

The following leases and subleases will be created concurrently:
(a)

IDA will net lease all of the aforesaid IDA Units to Petitioner for a nominal
(or no) net rent (the "IDA-Petitioner Lease").

-3­
TSB-A-93 (1)R
Real Property
Transfer Gains Tax
Real Estate Transfer Tax
January 7, 1993
(b)

4.

Petitioner will, in turn, sublet all of the aforesaid IDA Units to Prudential (the
"Petitioner-Prudential Lease") for a rent negotiated between Petitioner and
Prudential.

Prudential and the IDA will enter into certain transactions as to which Petitioner is
not a party and has no first hand knowledge as to their nature. Petitioner has been
told that pursuant to those transactions, Prudential will receive Benefits.

It is currently contemplated that Petitioner will convey to the IDA title to the IDA Units. The
IDA's title will end automatically and without further act on a certain date (the "Date"), or earlier
upon the occurrence of certain events. (Such ending of the IDA's title with respect to any or all units
or the ending of the IDA's title with respect to any or all units, through the delivery of a deed are
referred to herein as an "IDA Title Termination" with respect to such unit or units. An IDA Title
Termination that occurs on the Date is referred to herein as an "On-Date Termination." An IDA Title
Termination that occurs prior to the Date is referred to herein as a "Pre-Date Termination.") It is
anticipated that Petitioner will except and reserve to itself all right, title and interest in units not
conveyed to the IDA.
The precise list of events that would cause Pre-Date Termination is still being negotiated
among the parties. Among the events being considered by the parties are (i) the termination of the
Petitioner-Prudential Lease, (ii) the election by the IDA to end the IDA title, (iii) the IDA Units
becoming subject to real estate taxes, and (iv) the election by Petitioner to end the IDA title, which
election may only be made under certain circumstances, such as upon Petitioner making PILOT
Payments due to Prudential's failure to do so. In addition, it is possible that in the case of some or
all of these events the ending of the IDA's title will be accomplished by the IDA executing and
delivering to Petitioner a deed. A Pre-Date Termination may occur with respect to some or all of the
IDA Units.
Upon an IDA Title Termination with respect to any unit, whether an On-Date Termination
or a Pre-Date Termination, Petitioner will have full fee simple title to such unit. In addition, the IDAPetitioner Lease will no longer apply to such unit or, upon an IDA Title Termination with respect
to all the units, the IDA-Petitioner Lease will terminate.
Upon or after a Pre-Date Termination with respect to less than all of the units, Petitioner may
once again convey to the IDA title to some or all of such units. In addition, such units would again
become subject to the IDA-Petitioner Lease (and the Petitioner-Prudential Lease to the extent such
units were not otherwise subject to such lease) or a new such lease or leases would be entered into
with respect to such units.

-4­
TSB-A-93 (1)R
Real Property
Transfer Gains Tax
Real Estate Transfer Tax
January 7, 1993
The IDA Units, when reconveyed to Petitioner following an IDA Title Termination, Pre-Date
Termination or any other similar termination, will not be reconveyed subject to nor will Petitioner
assume any mortgages placed on such units by the IDA for the benefit of Prudential.
If Prudential exercises certain options to lease additional space or otherwise leases additional
space, then the condominium units representing such additional space may, to the extent that they
are eligible for some or all of the Benefits, become IDA Units. In such case, such IDA Units will
be conveyed by Petitioner to the IDA and the above leases with terms similar to those described
above will be executed for such additional IDA Units, for the remainder of the term of the above
leases.
At the time of any conveyance by Petitioner to the IDA or at the time of any IDA Title
Termination, it is possible that some or all of the IDA Units (or Petitioner's interest in such units)
will be subject to a mortgage placed on such units (or Petitioner's interest) by Petitioner. Similarly,
Petitioner may obtain financing secured by a mortgage (or may otherwise permit the placing of a
mortgage) which will be a lien on any or all of the following: (i) all or a portion of Petitioner's
leasehold position under the IDA-Petitioner Lease, (ii) all or a portion of Petitioner's interest in the
IDA Units and (iii) all or a portion of the IDA's title in the IDA Units (The IDA has agreed to subject
its title to any mortgage at Petitioner's request, subject to certain restrictions, such as limitations on
the mortgagee's ability to foreclose against the IDA's title.) Under all circumstances, as against the
IDA, Petitioner will be the beneficiary of any proceeds received under any debt secured by the lien
of such mortgage and as against the IDA will be the party with ultimate economic liability to repay
any such debt.
The term of the Petitioner-Prudential Lease, including any renewal periods, will be less than
49 years. In addition, Petitioner is not expected to grant Prudential any option to purchase the
Property or any portion thereof.
The gains tax is a ten percent tax on the gain derived from the transfer of real property, which
includes the transfer or acquisition of a controlling interest in an entity with an interest in real
property, where the real property is located in New York State and where the consideration for the
transfer is $1 million or more.
Section 590.5 of the Gains Tax Regulations provides as follows:
590.5 Lease/sublease as a transfer of real property. [Tax Law, §1440(7)]
(a) Question: Is the creation of a leasehold or sublease a
transfer of real property?
Answer: Yes. The creation of a leasehold or sublease is a transfer of an
interest in real property, but only where:

-5­
TSB-A-93 (1)R
Real Property
Transfer Gains Tax
Real Estate Transfer Tax
January 7, 1993
(1) the sum of the term of the lease or sublease and any
options for renewal exceeds 49 years;
(2) substantial capital improvements are or may be made by
or for the benefit of the lessee or sublessee; and
(3) the lease or sublease is for substantially all of the premises
constituting the real property. Substantially all is defined to mean 90
percent of the total rentable space, of the premises exclusive of
common areas. (See section 590.56 of this Part, relating to an
assignment of a lease.)
For the purpose of determining whether a lease or sublease is for
substantially all of the premises constituting the real property,
premises shall include, but not be limited to the following:
(1) an individual building, except for space which constitutes
an individual condominium or cooperative unit;
(2) an individual condominium or cooperative unit; or
(3) where a lease or sublease is of vacant land only, any
portion of such vacant land.
(b) Question: Is the creation of a leasehold for a term of less
than 49 years ever taxable?
Answer: Yes. If a leasehold is coupled with the granting of an option to
purchase the property, the transfer is taxable regardless of the term of the lease.
Section 590.67(a) of the Gains Tax Regulations provides, in part, as follows:
590.67 Transfers pursuant to industrial development agency projects.
[Tax Law, §1440]
(a) Question: How are transfers of interests in real property
to and from an industrial development agency (IDA) treated for
purposes of the gains tax?
Answer: When the company (the beneficiary of an industrial revenue bond
financing) transfers fee title to the real property to the IDA solely for the purpose of
receiving tax-exempt financing, and simultaneously leases such property back, upon
which the company will construct an improvement, the company will be considered
the owner of the project and there will not be a taxable event for gains tax purposes

-6­
TSB-A-93 (1)R
Real Property
Transfer Gains Tax
Real Estate Transfer Tax
January 7, 1993
until the company transfers an interest in the land or building to a party other than the
IDA. This is also true for ground leases/subleases or other similar transactions which
are designed to facilitate industrial revenue bond financings.
Section 575.7 of the Transfer Tax Regulations states as follows:
575.7 Leases and subleases (Tax Law, §1401(d)(e), (f)) (a) Creation of a
taxable lease or sublease not coupled with an option to purchase. The creation of a
lease or sublease is a conveyance subject to tax only where:
(1) the sum of the term of the lease or sublease and any options for renewal
exceeds 49 years, and
(2) substantial capital improvements are or may be made by or for the benefit
of the lessee or sublessee, and
(3) the lease or sublease is for substantially all of the premises constituting
the real property. "Substantially all" means ninety percent or more of the total
rentable space of the premises, exclusive of common areas. "Premises" means each
unit of real property which, at the time that the lease or sublease is created, is capable
of being sold separately.
For the purpose of determining whether a lease or sublease is for
substantially all of the premises constituting the real property,
premises shall include, but not be limited to the following:
(1) an individual building, except for space which constitutes
an individual condominium or cooperative unit;
(2) an individual condominium or cooperative unit; or
(3) where a lease or sublease is of vacant land only, any
portion of such vacant land.
Moreover, Section 575.11(a) of the Transfer Tax Regulations provides, in part, as follows:
(a) The following are examples of conveyances which are subject to the real estate
transfer tax.
*
13.

*

*

A conveyance of real property to an industrial development agency
(IDA) by a person who is not the beneficiary of the IDA financing, at
the direction of such beneficiary, with such beneficiary subsequently

-7­
TSB-A-93 (1)R
Real Property
Transfer Gains Tax
Real Estate Transfer Tax
January 7, 1993
leasing the property from the IDA, is subject to tax. In such a
conveyance, the beneficiary of the IDA financing and not the IDA is
deemed to be the grantee, and therefore the exemption described at
paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) of section 575.9 of this Part does not
apply.
(14)

A conveyance of real property by an IDA to a person who is not the
beneficiary of the IDA financing where such conveyance is made at
the direction of such beneficiary is subject to tax. In such a
conveyance, the beneficiary of the IDA financing is deemed to be the
grantor or the conveyance.

Section 575.11(b) of the Transfer Tax Regulations provides as follows:
"(b) The following are examples of conveyances which are not subject to the real
estate transfer tax.
(1) A conveyance of real property by the beneficiary of the industrial development
agency (IDA) financing to the IDA, in connection with the receipt of such financing
is not subject to tax.
(2) A conveyance of real property by the IDA, as grantor, to the beneficiary of the
IDA financing, as grantee is not subject to tax."
Section 250 of the Tax Law defines the term "mortgage" to include "every mortgage or deed
of trust which imposes a lien on or affects the title to real property, notwithstanding that such
property may form a part of the security for the debt or debts secured thereby."
In the matter of Macy & Co. v. Bates, 280 App. Div. 292 the Court held, in part, as follows:
A mortgage, whether in form or equitable, imports a debt or obligation to be
secured, due from the mortgagor to the mortgagee, a right to foreclose, and the
reciprocal right to redeem. Without those elements there can be no mortgage, and
they are absent here.
With respect to issue "1", the focus of Section 590.67 of the Gains Tax Regulations and
Section 575.11 of the Transfer Tax Regulations is to exclude from gains tax and transfer tax
respectively the transfer of title to real property to an IDA for the purpose of obtaining IDA
financing, where the grantor remains the beneficial owner of the property. In the instant case, while
Petitioner is not the beneficiary of the IDA financing, the transfer of the condominium units will not
result in a change in beneficial ownership since Petitioner retains all the benefits and burdens of
ownership of the IDA Units. Accordingly, in keeping with the intent of Section 590.67 of the Gains

-8­
TSB-A-93 (1)R
Real Property
Transfer Gains Tax
Real Estate Transfer Tax
January 7, 1993
Tax Regulations and Section 575.11 of the Transfer Tax Regulations, the conveyance of title to the
condominium units in connection with the Original Conveyance, in connection with a new
conveyance following a Pre-Date Termination and in connection with Prudential's lease of additional
space or any similar conveyance will not be subject to gains tax or transfer tax.
Concerning issue "2", pursuant to Section 590.67 of the Gains Tax Regulations and Section
575.11 of the Transfer Tax Regulations since Petitioner remains the beneficial owner of the
condominium units, a Pre-Date Termination of the IDA's title to any of the units will not result in
a change in beneficial interest. Therefore, a Pre-Date Termination of the IDA's title to any of the
units will not be subject to gains tax or transfer tax.
As for issue "3", pursuant to Section 590.67 of the Gains Tax Regulations and Section 575.11
of the Transfer Tax Regulations the lease back of property by an IDA to the beneficiary of the IDA
financing, is not subject to gains tax and transfer tax, respectively, since the beneficiary of the IDA
financing remains the beneficial owner of the property. In the instant case, while Petitioner is not the
beneficiary of the IDA financing, Petitioner is the beneficial owner of the property. Therefore, in
keeping with the intent of Section 590.67 of the Gains Tax Regulations and Section 575.11 of the
Transfer Tax Regulations, the creation of the IDA-Petitioner lease or portion thereof whether in
connection with its original creation, in connection with a new conveyance following a PreDate
Termination, in connection with Prudential's lease of additional space or the termination of the IDAPetitioner lease or portion thereof upon the expiration of its term or upon an IDA Title Termination
with respect to any or all of the IDA Units will not be subject to gains tax or transfer tax.
With respect to issue "4", pursuant to Section 590.5 of the Gains Tax Regulations and
Section 575.7 of the Transfer Tax Regulations the creation of a lease for a term of less than 49 years,
including renewal periods and not coupled with an option to purchase is not subject to gains tax and
transfer tax respectively. Accordingly, since the creation of the Petitioner-Prudential Lease or
portion thereof in connection with the original conveyance, in connection with a new conveyance
following a Pre-Date Termination or in connection with Prudential's lease of additional space will
be for a term of less than 49 years, including renewal periods and contains no options to purchase
such leases will not be subject to gains tax or transfer tax.
Concerning issue "5", pursuant to Section 250 of the Tax Law and Macy & Co. v. Bates,
supra, while the transactions described in issues "1", "2", "3" and "4" affect title to the real property
such conveyances are not given as security for the payment of a debt or for the performance of an
obligation. Accordingly, for purposes of Article 11 of the Tax Law no mortgage exists and such
transactions will not be subject to New York State and New York City mortgage recording tax.

-9­
TSB-A-93 (1)R
Real Property
Transfer Gains Tax
Real Estate Transfer Tax
January 7, 1993
It is noted that this opinion does not address the application of Article 11 of the Tax Law, the
Tax on Mortgages, to Petitioner's mortgaging of its interest in the IDA-Petitioner lease or all or a
portion of Petitioner's reversionary interest in the fee interest in the IDA Units.

DATED: January 7, 1993

/s/
PAUL B. COBURN
Deputy Director
Taxpayer Services Division

NOTE: The opinions expressed in Advisory Opinions
are limited to the facts set forth therein.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1993 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current New York tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.