πŸ§ͺ TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
NY TSB-A-83(12)S Sales Tax 1983-03-24

Can an advertising agency buy materials tax-free by relying on its exempt client's status, when it isn't the client's designated purchasing agent?

Short answer: An advertising agency must pay sales tax on materials it buys to perform a client's contract, even when the client is a tax-exempt organization, unless a true purchasing-agent relationship makes the client the buyer. Here the agency bought materials and billed the exempt client cost plus a commission, but the contract did not designate the agency as the client's purchasing agent and did not make the client directly liable on the agency's purchase orders (except for cancelled work). With no agency relationship established, the client's exempt status does not flow through, so the advertising agency is not relieved of its own obligation to pay sales tax on those purchases.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1983. Ezel answers yours, under current New York tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1983
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official New York State Department of Taxation and Finance Advisory Opinion (TSB-A), issued by the Office of Counsel at a taxpayer's request. It is limited to the facts set forth in it and binds the Department only with respect to the petitioner to whom it was issued, and only if that petitioner fully and accurately described all relevant facts; another taxpayer cannot rely on it. It reflects the law, regulations, and Department policy in effect when issued and may since have changed. New York State and local sales taxes are administered centrally by the Department. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed New York tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Tromson Monroe Advertising, Inc. acts as the advertising agency for the Curacao Government Tourist Bureau, a tax-exempt entity β€” preparing and placing media advertising and performing the usual ancillary functions. For the materials it buys, the agency charges the client cost plus a commission. It asked whether it must pay sales tax on those material purchases given the client's exempt status, and submitted a sample contract.

The Department held the agency owes the tax β€” no purchasing-agent relationship was established.

  • An exempt client's status only flows through via a real agency relationship. For the client's exemption to cover the agency's purchases, the agency must be buying as the client's purchasing agent, with the client standing behind the purchases.
  • The contract didn't create that relationship. Nowhere does it designate the agency as purchasing agent, and nowhere does it make the client directly liable on the agency's purchase orders β€” the only client liability appears for operations cancelled at the client's request.
  • Result: the agency pays the tax. With no agency relationship, the agency is not relieved of its obligation to pay sales tax on the materials it buys to perform the contract, notwithstanding the client's exempt status.

What this means for you

An exempt customer doesn't make your purchases exempt by default. If you buy materials in your own name to do a job for a tax-exempt client, you're the purchaser and you owe the tax β€” unless you're genuinely acting as the client's purchasing agent.

A purchasing-agency relationship has to be real and documented. The contract should actually designate you as the client's purchasing agent and make the client directly liable on the purchase orders. "Cost plus a commission" billing and the client's exempt status aren't enough on their own.

This is the recurring "exemption doesn't pass through" theme. Like a contractor buying to build for an exempt owner, an agency buying to serve an exempt client bears its own tax. The exemption belongs to the exempt entity as the actual, direct, liable purchaser β€” not to its vendors or agents.

Common questions

Q: My client is tax-exempt. Can I buy materials for its project tax-free?
A: Not unless you're the client's designated purchasing agent, with the client directly liable on the purchase orders. Absent that, you're the buyer and owe the tax, regardless of the client's exempt status.

Q: We bill the client cost plus a commission β€” doesn't that make it their purchase?
A: No. Billing arrangements don't establish a purchasing-agent relationship. The contract must designate you as purchasing agent and make the client liable on the orders.

Q: What would let the client's exemption apply?
A: A genuine agency relationship β€” the client designated as principal/purchaser, directly liable on the purchase orders β€” supported by proper exemption documentation.

Citations and references

Statutes:

  • Tax Law Β§ 1105(a) β€” sales tax on retail sales of tangible personal property (agency purchases taxable absent a purchasing-agent relationship)

Source

Original ruling text

New York State Department of Taxation and Finance
TSB-A-83(12)S
Sales Tax
March 24, 1983

Taxpayer Services Division
Technical Services Bureau
STATE OF NEW YORK
STATE TAX COMMISSION
ADVISORY OPINION

PETITION NO. S820217A

On February 17, 1982 a Petition for Advisory Opinion was received from Tromson Monroe
Advertising, Inc., 40 East 49th Street, New York, N.Y. 10017.
The issue raised is whether Petitioner, an advertising agency, is required to pay sales tax on
purchases of materials made in connection with its contracts with clients which are entities exempt
from sales tax. Petitioner has submitted a sample contract as a basis for this determination.
The submitted contract outlines an agreement between Petitioner and the Curacao
Government Tourist Bureau whereby the former is to act as an advertising agency for the latter by
preparing and placing media advertisements, as well as performing the ancillary functions normally
attendant upon such an agreement. With respect to the purchases of materials at issue herein,
Petitioner receives from its client cost plus a commission. It is to be noted, in this regard, that
nowhere in the contract is Petitioner designated a purchasing agent for its client, either in these or
other terms. Further, nowhere in the contract is there any indication that the client is to become
directly liable on Petitioner's purchase orders. The only such assumption of liability appears with
regard to operations cancelled at the behest of the client. Accordingly, there being no agency
relationship established, Petitioner is not relieved of its obligation to pay sales tax on its purchases
in the course of its performance of the subject contract by reason of the exempt status of its client.

DATED: March 3, 1983

s/FRANK J. PUCCIA
Director
Technical Services Bureau

ROBERT W. BOUCHARD, ACTING COMMISSIONER
GABRIEL B. DiCERBO , DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
FRANK J. PUCCIA, DIRECTOR
TP-8 (8/82)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1983 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current New York tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.