🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
KS P-1999-50 Kansas Retailers' Sales Tax 1999-03-03

Could a Kansas retailer store exemption certificates only as scanned electronic images under the 1999 recordkeeping rules?

Short answer: Not at that time. In 1999 the Department ruled that Kansas record-retention regulations (K.A.R. 92-19-4a), written in terms of microfilm and microfiche, did not clearly cover electronic images, so retailers had to keep the original paper certificate or a microfilm or microfiche copy. The Department said it would review the rule for a possible update. Check current Kansas rules, which have since modernized.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1999. Ezel answers yours, under current Kansas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1999
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Kansas Department of Revenue Private Letter Ruling (issued under K.A.R. 92-19-59). It binds the Department only as to the specific retailer who requested it and the facts stated; taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. It may not be cited or relied upon as precedent by any other person, and it ceases to be valid if a statute, regulation, or interpretation it relied upon changes substantially. Kansas state and local sales and use taxes are administered centrally by the Department, so there is no self-collected home-rule city tax outside its scope. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer asked whether Kansas allows exemption certificates to be stored as scanned electronic images that can be reproduced on demand in printed form, and whether a printed reproduction of a scanned certificate would satisfy an auditor's request to produce the certificate.

The Department explained that its record-retention regulations, effective in 1987, were written in terms of microfilm and microfiche and did not clearly address electronically stored images. Given the statutory requirement that vendors have in their "possession a properly executed exemption certificate provided by the consumer claiming exemption," the Department construed the rule (K.A.R. 92-19-4a) as requiring the vendor to possess either a physical copy or a microfilm or microfiche copy. Until the regulation could be updated, retailers had to retain the original paper document or a microfilm/microfiche copy meeting K.A.R. 92-19-4a. The Department noted it would review the regulation in the coming months to consider whether and how it should be updated.

(This is a 1999 ruling. Recordkeeping rules and technology have changed since; confirm the current Kansas requirements before relying on this answer for electronic storage today.)

What this means for you

For the era of this ruling, exemption-certificate retention meant paper or film — not scanned images.

  • Scanned images weren't enough (in 1999). The rule then recognized paper, microfilm, or microfiche, not electronic images.
  • Keep the original paper or film copy. The Department required the original paper document or a compliant microfilm/microfiche copy.
  • The Department flagged an update. It said it would review K.A.R. 92-19-4a to consider covering electronic storage.
  • Verify today's rule. Given how old this is, check the current regulation before storing certificates electronically.

Common questions

Could a Kansas retailer keep only a scanned image of an exemption certificate (per this 1999 ruling)?
No. The Department required the original paper certificate or a microfilm/microfiche copy, because the rule then didn't clearly cover electronic images.

Would a printout of a scanned certificate satisfy an auditor then?
Not on its own — the retailer had to possess a physical, microfilm, or microfiche copy under K.A.R. 92-19-4a.

Has this changed?
The Department said it would review the rule, and recordkeeping standards have modernized since 1999. Confirm the current requirements before relying on electronic-only storage.

Can other retailers rely on this ruling?
Not directly, and it's dated. A private letter ruling binds the Department only for the requesting taxpayer and stated facts; here the underlying rule was expressly slated for review.

Citations and references

  • K.A.R. 92-19-4a — the record-retention regulation (effective 1987, written for microfilm/microfiche) that the Department construed to require possession of a physical, microfilm, or microfiche copy of an exemption certificate; it did not clearly authorize electronic-image storage at the time. The ruling cites no numbered K.S.A. statute.

Source

  • Original ruling (DOCX): https://www.ksrevenue.gov/pildocs/rulings/P-1999-50.docx
  • Kansas Policy Information Library: https://www.ksrevenue.gov/prpil.html

Original ruling text

Private Letter Ruling

Body:

Office of Policy & Research

March 3, 1999

XXXX
XXXX
XXXX

RE: Your letter received December 14, 1998

Dear XXXX:

I have been asked to answer your letter received in December. In it, you ask whether Kansas allows exemption certificates to be stored as scanned images on electronic media. Your specific questions are:

  1. Does the storage of a certificate, or related relevant documents, as an electronic image, able to be reproduced on demand in printed form, meet your State’s requirements for certificate retention?
  2. In the event of any audit proceeding, does the presentation of a printed reproduction of a scanned certificate comply with a request by an official of your department that a company produce a certificate?

Kansas regulations that fix record retention requirements became effective in 1987. These regulations are written in terms of microfilm and microfiche. They do not clearly address electronically stored images. Accordingly, the statutory requirement that vendors have in their “possession a properly executed exemption certificate provided by the consumer claiming exemption” must be construed as requiring vendors to possess either a physical copy or a microfilm or microfiche copy. See K.A.R. 92-19-4a, copy enclosed. We will review this regulation during the next few months to consider whether and how it should be updated. However, until it can be updated, retailers must retail the original paper document or a microfilm or microfiche copy that meets the requirements of K.A.R. 92-19-4a. Please call me if you have any additional questions.

Sincerely,

Thomas E. Hatten
Attorney/Policy & Research

Enclosure

Date Composed: 03/17/1999 Date Modified: 10/11/2001

Table 1

Ruling Number: P-1999-50

Table 2

Tax Type: Kansas Retailers' Sales Tax
Brief Description: Requirements for retailers to maintain exemption certificates.
Keywords:
Approval Date: 03/03/1999

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1999 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Kansas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.