🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
IL ST 14-0033-GIL Illinois Retailers' Occupation (Sales & Use) Tax 2014-07-10

Was a software vendor's outsourced printing and mailing of customer invoices and late letters taxable in Illinois?

Short answer: IDOR did not decide without the invoices, license, contracts, registration status, and delivery facts. A service with no tangible-property transfer generally was outside Retailers' Occupation and Service Occupation Tax, but printed property transferred through a primary and secondary serviceman could create Service Occupation or Use Tax. Any canned-software purchase required separate license analysis.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2014. Ezel answers yours, under current Illinois tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2014
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Illinois Department of Revenue General Information Letter (GIL), issued under 2 Ill. Adm. Code 1200.120. A GIL merely directs a taxpayer to the relevant Department regulations or other sources of information; it is NOT a statement of Department policy and is NOT binding on the Department. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Illinois tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A self-storage operator's software vendor used account data to prepare invoices and late letters, then sent them to a third-party mailing service for printing, postage, and delivery. The customer disputed tax charged on that portion of the monthly invoice.

IDOR could not decide the transaction without reviewing invoices, software licenses, contracts among the parties, the servicemen's registration status, and interstate-delivery facts.

As a general rule, a service involving no transfer of tangible personal property was outside Retailers' Occupation Tax, Use Tax, Service Occupation Tax, and Service Use Tax. If tangible property was transferred incident to service, the provider had to use one of Illinois's four serviceman tax methods.

Because the vendor contracted out part of the work, the primary- and secondary-serviceman rules could determine where Service Occupation Tax or Use Tax arose and how transferred property's cost price was measured.

IDOR also could not determine whether the customer acquired canned software. If it did, the transaction was taxable unless the software license met every requirement in Section 130.1935. Property physically delivered from Illinois to a point outside Illinois and not returned could qualify for the cited interstate-commerce exemption when the rule's conditions were met.

What this means for you

Calling a charge mailing, postage, software, or service did not settle the result. The contracts, property transfer, provider registration, software rights, and delivery destination all had to be documented.

Common questions

Did IDOR say the mailing charge was taxable? It did not decide.

Were pure services with no tangible-property transfer taxable under these taxes? Generally no.

Could the third-party mailer affect the analysis? Yes.

Citations and references

  • 86 Ill. Adm. Code 140.101-140.109 and 140.145.
  • 86 Ill. Adm. Code 130.1935.
  • 86 Ill. Adm. Code 140.501(b).

Source

Original ruling text

ST 14-0033-GIL 07/10/14 SALE OF SERVICE
If no tangible personal property is transferred to the customer, then no Illinois Retailers’ Occupation Tax or
Service Occupation Tax would apply. See 86 Ill. Adm. Code Parts 130 and 140. (This is a GIL.)

July 10, 2014

Dear Xxxx:
This letter is in response to your letter dated May 7, 2014, in which you request information.
The Department issues two types of letter rulings. Private Letter Rulings (“PLRs”) are issued by the
Department in response to specific taxpayer inquiries concerning the application of a tax statute or
rule to a particular fact situation. A PLR is binding on the Department, but only as to the taxpayer
who is the subject of the request for ruling and only to the extent the facts recited in the PLR are
correct and complete. Persons seeking PLRs must comply with the procedures for PLRs found in the
Department’s regulations at 2 Ill. Adm. Code 1200.110. The purpose of a General Information Letter
(“GIL”) is to direct taxpayers to Department regulations or other sources of information regarding the
topic about which they have inquired. A GIL is not a statement of Department policy and is not
binding on the Department. See 2 Ill. Adm. Code 1200.120. You may access our website at
www.tax.illinois.gov to review regulations, letter rulings and other types of information relevant to your
inquiry.
The nature of your inquiry and the information you have provided require that we respond with
a GIL. In your letter you have stated and made inquiry as follows:
A vendor we utilize for software services has begun assessing Illinois sales tax on a
portion of its monthly invoice. The tax is being assessed on third party mailing services.
COMPANY (“COMPANY”) operates self storage facilities and Vendor (Vendor) is the
software provider. The Vendor software product, PRODUCT, is utilized for the
management of tenant accounts including rent roll management, application of tenant
payments, etc. As part of Vendor’s software service, they also provide for third party
mailings to COMPANY tenants primarily related to producing and mailing monthly
invoices and tenant late letters to COMPANY tenants. These mailings are based upon
templates/forms (“Form Letters”) which reside within the PRODUCT software
application with modifications to these templates based upon specific COMPANY
business requirements. In providing this service, Vendor compiles information from the
PRODUCT system which determines if mailings are required based upon specific
triggers (i.e. days past due for late letters, and rental due date for invoices) and
populates the aforementioned Form Letters to prepare letters for mailing. These Form
Letters are then sent off to a third party mailing service where postage is applied and
mailings are sent. COMPANY is billed for the service provided in preparing, handling,
and mailing the letters. I have had two separate conversations with two separate
Agents of the Illinois Department of Revenue 4/1/14 (xxxx) and 5/5/14 (xxxx) and in
each instance the Agents have concluded that these services are not taxable for the
following reasons:
1.) Postage is not taxable;
2.) There is no sales tax on printed forms (with reference to Part 130-2000) as
the printed forms have no value to anyone but COMPANY; and

COMPANY
Page 2
July 10, 2014

3.)

There is no sales tax on services in Illinois.

The Vendor has stated that they have also called the Illinois DOR and were told that the
service was taxable as it was part of a “bundled” sale. In communicating this to the
Agent on my 5/5/14 call, I was told by the Agent that this was incorrect and that the
transaction was not taxable and that there is not a “bundling” concept that would make
the transaction taxable. As the Vendor is still contending that the transactions are
taxable, COMPANY is requesting a Letter Ruling from the Illinois Department of
Revenue so both COMPANY and the Vendor will have clarity and conclusion to this
issue (please see attached email communications between COMPANY and Vendor for
further detail). As such, I am requesting a Letter Ruling regarding the taxability of the
transaction outlined above be completed and mailed to my attention at the following
address:
COMPANY
Attn: Xxxxxx
ADDRESS
CITY, STATE, ZIPCODE
I appreciate your assistance with this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact me
directly at xxx-xxx-xxxx should you have any questions or require any further
information regarding the request above. My email address is xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
DEPARTMENT’S RESPONSE:
We cannot provide you with a specific answer to your questions without reviewing invoices for
the products/services you receive as well as any licensing agreements you may have signed for the
use of a third party’s software products. In addition, without reviewing COMPANY’s specific
contractual obligations with Vendor and the third-party mailing service, and without knowing the
registration status of the servicemen involved, the Department is without sufficient information to
provide you with a specific response. However, I hope the following information regarding Retailers’
Occupation Tax, Use Tax, Service Occupation Tax and Service Use Tax are helpful.
The Illinois Retailers' Occupation Tax Act imposes a tax upon persons engaged in this State in
the business of selling tangible personal property to purchasers for use or consumption. See 35 ILCS
120/2; 86 Ill. Adm. Code 130.101. In Illinois, Use Tax is imposed on the privilege of using, in this
State, any kind of tangible personal property that is purchased anywhere at retail from a retailer. See
35 ILCS 105/3; 86 Ill. Adm. Code 150.101. These taxes comprise what is commonly known as "sales"
tax in Illinois. If the purchases occur in Illinois, the purchasers must pay the Use Tax to the retailer at
the time of purchase. The retailers are then allowed to retain the amount of Use Tax paid to
reimburse themselves for their Retailers' Occupation Tax liability incurred on those sales. If the
purchases occur outside Illinois, purchasers must self assess their Use Tax liability and remit it
directly to the Department.
Retailers' Occupation and Use Taxes do not apply to sales of service. The Service Occupation
Tax Act and Service Use Tax are imposed on the transfer of tangible personal property incident to

COMPANY
Page 3
July 10, 2014

sales of service. See 86 Ill. Adm. Code 140.101 and 160.101. If the transactions you are inquiring
about do not involve the transfer of any tangible personal property to your company, then they
generally would not be subject to Service Occupation Tax, or Service Use Tax.
It is possible that the scenario you have described could be considered a service transaction
that may result in either Service Occupation Tax or Use Tax liability for the servicemen, depending
upon which tax base the servicemen choose to calculate their liability. For general information, see 86
Ill. Code 140.101 through 140.109 regarding sales of service and Service Occupation Tax.
A serviceman’s liability may be calculated in one of four ways: 1. Separately stated selling
price of tangible personal property transferred incident to service; 2. 50% of the serviceman’s entire
bill; 3. Service Occupation Tax on the serviceman’s cost price if he is a registered de minimis
serviceman; or, 4. Use Tax on the serviceman’s cost price if he is a de minimis serviceman not
otherwise required to be registered under Section 2a of the Retailers’ Occupation Tax Act.
Using the first method, servicemen may separately state the selling price of each item
transferred as a result of the sale price of service. The tax is then calculated on the separately stated
selling price of the tangible personal property transferred. If the servicemen do not separately state
the selling price of the tangible personal property transferred, they must use 50% of the entire bill to
the service customer as the tax base. Both of the above methods provide that in no event may the tax
base be less than the serviceman’s cost price of the tangible personal property transferred. See 86 Ill.
Adm. Code 140.106. These methods result in the customer incurring a Service Use Tax liability. See
86 Ill. Adm. Code 160.101.
The third way servicemen may account for their tax liability only applies to de minimis
servicemen who have either chosen to be registered or are required to be registered because they
incur Retailers’ Occupation Tax liability with respect to a portion of their business. See 86 Ill. Adm.
Code 140.109. Servicemen may qualify as de minimis if they determine that the annual aggregate
cost price of tangible personal property transferred incident to the sale of service is less than 35% of
the total annual gross receipts from service transactions (75% in the case of pharmacists and
persons engaged in graphics arts production). Servicemen no longer have the option of determining
whether they are de minimis using a transaction by transaction basis. Registered de minimis
servicemen are authorized to pay Service Occupation Tax (which includes local taxes) based upon
their cost price of tangible personal property transferred incident to the sale of service. Such
servicemen should give suppliers resale certificates and remit Service Occupation Tax using the
Service Occupation Tax rates for their locations. This method also results in the customer incurring a
Service Use Tax liability.
The final method of determining tax liability may be used by de minimis servicemen that are
not otherwise required to be registered under Section 2a of the Retailers’ Occupation Tax Act. Such
de minimis servicemen handle their tax liability by paying Use Tax to their suppliers. If their suppliers
are not registered to collect and remit tax, the servicemen must register, self-assess and remit Use
Tax to the Department. The servicemen are considered to be the end-users of the tangible personal
property transferred incident to service. Consequently, they are not authorized to collect a “tax” from
the service customers. See 86 Ill. Adm. Code 140.108. Under this method the customer incurs no
Service Tax liability.

COMPANY
Page 4
July 10, 2014

When a serviceman contracts out all or a portion of the service that he will provide, he is acting
as a primary serviceman in a multi-service situation. As a primary serviceman, he engages the
services of a secondary serviceman in order to obtain all or part of the product and services desired
by the service customer. Whether the primary and secondary servicemen are registered or de
minimis will determine at what point Service Occupation Tax or Use Tax will be incurred. See 86 Ill.
Adm. Code 140.145 to determine the tax incurred in these situations. Generally, when a primary
serviceman purchases tangible personal property from a secondary serviceman, the primary
serviceman shall determine his cost price either by using the separately-stated selling price of
tangible personal property set forth on the invoice from the secondary serviceman or, if no selling
price is separately stated, 50% of the total invoice including labor and service charges, in the absence
of proof (e.g., the secondary serviceman's purchase invoices showing his cost price) of the
consideration paid by the secondary serviceman for the purchase of such property. Depending on
whether each of the servicemen are registered servicemen in Illinois, 86 Ill. Adm. Code 140.145(c)
may apply, and certificates of resale may be given for purchases of services involving the transfer of
tangible personal property which will be transferred incident to a subsequent sale of service.
We cannot determine, based on the limited information contained in your letter, whether your
company purchases any canned software, which is considered tangible personal property. See 86 Ill.
Adm. Code 130.1935. It seems that Vendor maintains control of its own software and provides
services to your company. However, if COMPANY purchases canned software from Vendor, this
would be a taxable transaction unless the license meets all of the requirements in 86 Ill. Adm. Code
130.1935.
We also cannot determine, based on the limited information contained in your letter, whether
any sales are made into interstate commerce. An exemption is available for servicemen on property
resold as an incident to a sale of service under an agreement by which the serviceman is obligated to
make physical delivery of the goods from a point in this State to a point outside this State, not to be
returned to this State, provided such delivery is actually made. See 86 Ill. Adm. Code 140.501(b).
Please note unregistered de minimis servicemen may also claim the interstate commerce exemption.
See 86 Ill. Adm. Code 140.108(a)(2)(B).
I hope this information is helpful. If you require additional information, please visit our website
at www.tax.illinois.gov or contact the Department’s Taxpayer Information Division at (217) 782-3336.
Very truly yours,

Cara Bishop
Associate Counsel

CB:lkm

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2014 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Illinois tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.