Did a cloud collaboration provider owe Illinois Telecommunications Excise Tax when customers used their own internet and telecom connections?

Plain-English summary

A technology company offered hosted voice, video, messaging, conferencing, and collaboration applications. Customers used their own telecommunications, internet, or network connections purchased from third parties.

IDOR declined a private ruling but said that, in general, a company is not providing telecommunications when customers reach its services through connections for which they pay their own third-party carrier. Those service charges therefore did not incur Telecommunications Excise Tax on that basis.

The result differs when a telecommunications retailer also provides value-added processing. Under 35 ILCS 630/2 and Rule 495.100(c), excluded processing or storage charges must be disaggregated and separately stated from telecommunications charges; otherwise the entire charge is taxable telecommunications.

The GIL also cautioned that electronically transferred information is not tangible personal property, but canned software remains taxable regardless of delivery method under Rule 130.1935, subject to the software rules.

Common questions

Did customer-provided connectivity make the cloud provider a telecom retailer? Generally no.

What if telecom and value-added services are bundled? The excluded charges must be separately stated and supported or the whole charge is taxable.

Citations and references

• 35 ILCS 630/2, 3, and 4
• 86 Ill. Adm. Code 495.100(c)
• 86 Ill. Adm. Code 130.2105(a)(3) and 130.1935

Source

• Landing page: https://taxarchive.illinois.gov/research/legal/letter-rulings/sales-tax/2013.html
• Original PDF: https://tax.illinois.gov/content/dam/soi/en/web/taxarchive/research/legal/letter-rulings/sales-tax/2013/st-13-0074.pdf

Original ruling text

ST 13-0074-GIL 11/26/2013 TELECOMMUNICATIONS EXCISE TAX
The Telecommunications Excise Tax is imposed upon the act or privilege of originating or
receiving intrastate or interstate telecommunications in Illinois at the rate of 7% of the gross
charges for such telecommunications purchased at retail from retailers. See 35 ILCS 630/1 et
seq. (This is a GIL.)
November 26, 2013

Dear Xxxxx:
This letter is in response to your letter dated February 25, 2013, in which you request
information. The Department issues two types of letter rulings. Private Letter Rulings (“PLRs”)
are issued by the Department in response to specific taxpayer inquiries concerning the
application of a tax statute or rule to a particular fact situation. A PLR is binding on the
Department, but only as to the taxpayer who is the subject of the request for ruling and only to
the extent the facts recited in the PLR are correct and complete. Persons seeking PLRs must
comply with the procedures for PLRs found in the Department’s regulations at 2 Ill. Adm. Code
1200.110. The purpose of a General Information Letter (“GIL”) is to direct taxpayers to
Department regulations or other sources of information regarding the topic about which they
have inquired. A GIL is not a statement of Department policy and is not binding on the
Department.
See 2 Ill. Adm. Code 1200.120.
You may access our website at
www.tax.illinois.gov to review regulations, letter rulings and other types of information relevant
to your inquiry.
In your letter of February 25, 2013, you have stated and made inquiry as follows:
The purpose of this letter (‘Letter’) is to request a sales and use tax ruling on
behalf of COMPANY 1 (‘COMPANY 2,’ and together with its affiliates,
‘COMPANY 1’) upon which COMPANY 1 may rely.
COMPANY 1is a leading multi-brand technology solutions provider to business,
government, education and healthcare customers in the U.S. and Canada,
providing comprehensive and integrated solutions for its customers’ technology
needs through its extensive hardware, software and value-added service offerings.
COMPANY 1 offers over 100,000 products from over 1,000 brands and a
multitude of advanced technology solutions. Its offerings range from discrete
hardware and software products to complex technology solutions such as
virtualization, collaboration, security, mobility, data center optimization, and
cloud computing.
As described in more detail below, COMPANY 2 offers a cloud-based service
offering (the ‘Cloud Collaboration Service Offering’ or the ‘Offering’) to
customers nationwide. 1 The Cloud Collaboration Service Offering will provide
1

COMPANY 2 began marketing the Cloud Collaboration Service Offering on July 1, 2012. The Offering is still in
the implementation phase and COMPANY 2 has not yet billed any customers.

certain cloud-based applications and related services (the ‘Cloud Collaboration
Services’ or the ‘Services’) that support a customer’s telecommunication
equipment, including its voice, video, messaging, presence, audio, web
conferencing, and mobile capabilities. This Letter specifically requests a ruling
concerning the applicability of sales and use taxes in your state to the Cloud
Collaboration Service Offering .
BACKGROUND
Overview of the Cloud Collaboration Service Offering Offering
Generally, a business’s phone systems, computers and other telecommunications
equipment utilize various software applications and hardware in order to operate
and function in the manner necessary for the business’s needs. For instance,
although a business may have a telecommunications provider that provides it with
telephone lines to make outgoing and receive incoming calls, the business will
need hardware and software that internally instructs the business’s
telecommunications equipment as to how to process and route those calls.
Historically, customers have handled these functions internally, and such
functions have not been subject to sales tax. Through the Cloud Collaboration
Service Offering, the COMPANY 2 will simply be providing these non-taxable
functions as a service to its customers from an offsite location.
Specifically, the Cloud Collaboration Service Offering replaces certain customerowned and maintained software applications and related computer hardware that
support a customer’s telecommunications equipment with a COMPANY 2-hosted
alternative. In this hosted alternative, COMPANY 2 owns (or is the lessee or
license of) and maintains certain hardware and software. The benefit of Cloud
Collaboration Service Offering is that customers can utilize the hardware and
software Cloud applications on an as-needed basis from COMPANY 2, thereby
reducing the customer’s capital investment and on-going technology support and
maintenance expenditures for such systems. The customer utilizes the hosted
applications by means of the customer’s existing telecommunications, Internet, or
network connections, for which it pays its own third party telecommunications
provider. In essence, in exchange for a monthly fee, COMPANY 2 will operate
back-office equipment and software applications that provide necessary or
enhanced functionality for a customer’s phone systems and other
telecommunication equipment.
The customer will provide the
telecommunications equipment.
COMPANY 2 will acquire, operate and maintain all the hardware and software
necessary to provide the Services and ensure optimal performance. The hardware
and software required for providing the Services will be installed on servers
located in Illinois. COMPANY 2 employees based in Illinois will provide onsite
professional services to maintain the hardware and software, and COMPANY 2
employees based in STATE will remotely monitor performance, perform

necessary adds, moves, changes, and deletions, and provide troubleshooting for
issues that arise during performance.
The Manner in Which The Services Are Provided
The Services will be provided by COMPANY 2 on a remote basis through the use
of COMPANY 2-owned Cisco Unified Communications Manager (‘CUCM’)
clusters located at a COMPANY 2 data enter. The CUCM clusters will deploy a
variety of available COMPANY 2-owned, client software applications that are
utilized by customer-owned phones and workstations located at customer sites.
As described further below, the applications generally provide the customer’s
telecommunication equipment with certain necessary or enhanced functionalities.
Customers will be responsible for providing connectivity of sufficient bandwidth
between the customer’s location and COMPANY 2’s data center. COMPANY 2
relies on the customer’s QoS-enabled, voice-grade Local Area Network and Wide
Area Network over which it provides the Services throughout a customer’s
geographic locations. Connectivity to the Public Switched Telephone Network
(PSTN’) is not included in the Cloud Collaboration Service Offering. All
connections between the customer and COMPANY 2’s data center are through a
customer’s existing or newly-ordered PSTN circuits, phone lines and Internet
connections. The PSTN or other connections can reside throughout the customer
locations, and are terminated into the COMPANY 2 data center through
customer-owned, COMPANY 2-managed gateways. Customers are always the
‘customer of record’ for any PSTN, Internet or other service for the transportation
or transmission of messages or information; the applications do not transport or
transmit messages or information. All customer communications with third
parties are through customer-contracted PSTN connections that are not provided
by COMPANY 2. COMPANY 2’s customers continue to communicate with
third parties over the PSTN, and continue to pay their telecommunications
provider the same charges and taxes for such capabilities, both before and after
signing up for the COMPANY 2 Cloud Collaboration Service Offering . PSTN
communications with third parties are never physically routed through
COMPANY 2’s data center equipment.
COMPANY 2 may also host and deploy certain customer-owned software
applications that provide enhanced functionalities for a customer’s phone systems
and other telecommunication equipment. Such hosted services are available as
add-n services for additional fees (as described below), and are utilized by
customers in the same manner as the COMPANY 2-owned and hosted software
applications.
Agreements and Monthly Charges
To purchase the Cloud Collaboration Service Offering, customers will enter into a
contract with COMPANY 2 that includes a customer service order, a service

description for the Offering, and a detailed pricing invoice. A representative copy
of each is attached as Attachment A.
Under the contract with a customer, COMPANY 2 will charge the customer a
monthly user license fee, 2 calculated based on the number of users. The monthly
fee covers the charges for hardware, software, virtual service instance charges,
required storage charges, rack space charges, power and cooling charges, as well
as monitoring and management charges, most moves-adds-changes and major
version upgrades. To the extent the customer purchases add-on services
(including the hosting of customer-owned software applications), separate fees are
charged for each such service. Charges for maintenance and management of any
customer-owned software applications are also separately stated on the monthly
invoice.
Description of the Services Provided by the Embedded Software Applications
As described above, the COMPANY 2-owned software applications available
through the Offering support a customer’s own voice, video, messaging, presence,
audio-web conferencing, and mobile capabilities. A brief description of the
supporting services provided by the various applications is set forth below:
Voice.
A COMPANY 2 server, utilizing the CUCM,
communicates with the customer’s voice gateway device (i.e., the
customer-owned switch) to provide instructions to the customer’s
voice gateway device for the processing and routing of incoming
and outgoing calls among the customer’s phone extensions; the
call is not routed through COMPANY 2’s server. No end-to-end
communication is ever routed through COMPANY 2’s server.
This CUCM system also supports a customer’s other forms of
communication to its IP end-points, media-processing devices,
VoIP gateways, mobile devices, and multimedia applications, as
generally described below. A diagram depicting these voice
services is attached as Attachment B.
Video. Video is the technology of electronically capturing,
recording, processing, storing, transmitting, and reconstructing a
sequence of still images representing scenes in motion. Video
utilizes components such as the Cisco IP end-points, Cisco Jabber
desk-top clients, or purpose-built video endpoints such as the Cisco
EX60/90 or larger units. The video support services will be
provided by COMPANY 2’s server through a CUCM cluster in the
same manner as outlined above with respect to a customer’s voice
communication capabilities.
2

The fee is denominated as a ‘license’ fee, but COMPANY 1 does not in fact license or lease any software or
tangible personal property to the customer under the contract.

Messaging. When a customer phone extension does not answer an
incoming call, the COMPANY 2 server, utilizing the CUCM,
instructs the customer’s voice gateway device to send the call to
voicemail. The voice messages are then stored on the COMPANY
2 servers and available for the user to access and manage at his or
her convenience. The voice messaging support services provided
by the Cloud Collaboration Service Offering will allow users to
access and manage voice messages stored on COMPANY 2-owned
servers in a variety of ways, using an email inbox, web browser,
Cisco Unified IP Phone, Smartphones, and Cisco Jabber, among
other components.
Presence. Presence support services are provided by COMPANY
2 through a Cisco Unified Presence application that provides users
the ability to determine when colleagues are available. The Cisco
Unified Presence application offers the flexibility of rich, open
interfaces that allow enablement of instant messaging and rich,
network-based presence for a wide variety of business
applications. As is the case with respect to the other services, the
customer’s own communications equipment accesses the Presence
application hosted on COMPANY 2’s servers to utilize the
presence capabilities.
Audio Conferencing.
With respect to a customer’s audio
conferencing capabilities, COMPANY 2 supports a customerowned Cisco router and the phone devices through its hosted
CUCM, in a manner similar to that which is described above with
respect to the voice support services.
Web Conferencing. Cisco’s WebEx application is an optional,
subscription-based component of the Offering. WebEx is a cloudbased web conferencing application that permits desktop sharing
through a web browser with phone conferencing and video.
WebEx operates through a user’s computer or wireless device, an
audio connection (either through the computer or through a phone),
and a webcam (optional).
Mobility Services. COMPANY 2 supports a customer’s mobile
devices through use of the Cisco Jabber application. Mobile
clients utilizing Cisco Jabber can place and receive calls over their
own corporate wireless local area network and telephony
infrastructure, using COMPANY 2’s server to instruct the routing
of calls, and essentially turns a mobile phone into another
extension on the CUCM. COMPANY 2’s server itself does not
provide the routing for the call or otherwise function as a switch.

No end-to-end communication is ever routed through COMPANY
2’s server.
With respect to each of the support services described above, a customer utilizes
the COMPANY 2-owned and hosted software with its own equipment and
through its own telecommunication, Internet or other network connection. At no
time does the customer download or otherwise posses [sic] the software that is
hosted by COMPANY 2. In addition, COMPANY 2 does not provide the
telecommunication, Internet or network connections necessary for the customer to
utilize the Services. The net result is that the customer has done nothing more
than out-source certain activities previously performed in-house that were never
subject to sales tax.
RULINGS REQUESTED
1.

The hardware and software that COMPANY 2 purchases, leases or
licenses from third parties is purchased, leased or licensed by COMPANY
2 for use or consumption and not for resale.

2.

The Services provided by the Cloud Collaboration Service Offering are
nontaxable services and not a lease or license of hardware or software.

3.

Alternatively, if it is determined that the Cloud Collaboration Service
Offering constitutes a lease, license or other transfer of software to a
customer, such transfer is exempt from tax as electronically delivered
software.

4.

The Services provided by the Cloud Collaboration Service Offering are
not taxable telecommunications services.

5.

For sales and use tax purposes, the Services provided by the Cloud
Collaboration Service Offering are provided in Illinois.
ANALYSIS

The hardware and software that COMPANY 2 purchases, leases or licenses from
third parties is purchased, leased or licensed by COMPANY 2 for use or
consumption and not for resale.
COMPANY 2 purchases, leases or licenses the hardware and software that it uses
to provide the services offered in connection with its Cloud Collaboration Service
Offering from various third parties. COMPANY 2 does not resell, lease, license
or otherwise transfer use or possession of such software or hardware to its
customers. At all times, the software applications are hosted on COMPANY 2owned servers located at COMPANY 2’s data center in Illinois. Therefore, the

hardware and software is purchased, leased or licensed, as applicable, for use and
consumption by COMPANY 2 rather than for resale to its customers.
The Services provided by the Cloud Collaboration Service Offering are nontaxable services and do not constitute a lease or license of hardware or software.
The Cloud Collaboration Service Offering constitutes the provision of nontaxable services and does not constitute the lease or license of hardware or
software in connection therewith. COMPANY 2 owns all of the hardware and the
licenses for all of the software necessary to provide the Services. A customer
pays a monthly fee to utilize the software applications (hosted on COMPANY 2owned equipment) through which the Services are provided; a customer does not
enter into any lease or license for the software or the equipment, acquires no right
to possess such software or equipment (and no right to download, duplicate or
manipulate the software), and acquires no right to use such software or equipment
independent of the receipt of the Services. Notably, the customer service order
that a customer executes states that such agreement ‘is not intended to, and will
not, constitute a lease of any real or personal property.’
In this regard, several states have ruled that access to software solely through the
Internet is not generally considered a taxable transfer of software but rather is a
non-taxable service.
See, e.g., Kansas Opinion Letter No. O-2012-001
(concluding that a taxpayer’s provision of access to and use of software and
servers to customers was not a taxable sale or lease of software or hardware, but
rather was a non-taxable service); Colorado Private Letter Ruling No. PLR-11-7
(December 20, 2011) (holding that a hosted software solution to transfer large
data files via the Internet was a non-taxable service because the provider had
physical custody over the property and staff that program and control the systems,
and the user did not have significant control over the servers and software);
Virginia Public Document No 12-2 (January 19, 2012) (concluding that a
taxpayer’s provision of an online authentication solution for customers seeking to
perform secure electronic commerce and communications over the internet was a
non-taxable service, even though the taxpayer electronically sent a digital
certificate to the customer that the customer installed on its web server); Virginia
Public Document No. 10-264 (December 15, 2010) (finding that providing access
to a web-based global database to allow customers to perform searches and create
reports, as well as the customer’s purchase of certain workflow add-ons that
provide a variety of related enhanced functionalities, was a non-taxable service
because there was no transfer of tangible personal property); Kansas Private
Letter Rulings No. P-2009-005 (June 26, 2009) and P-2011-010 (December 27,
2011) (holding that the monthly fee charged to customers to remotely access a
pre-written computer software program located on an out-of-state server was not
subject to Kansas sales or use tax); Indiana Letter of Finding No. 04-20110291
(March 28, 2012) (holding that taxpayer’s sale of web-based computer programs
did not involve the right to use pre-written computer software); Iowa Policy Letter
12300002 (January 11, 2012) (finding that a taxpayer’s sales of online access to

certain hosted software was not considered taxable as a sale of tangible personal
property because the customer does not possess the software); Nebraska
Information Guide No. 6-511-2011, Sales and Use Tax Guide for Computer
Software (July 27, 2011) (‘[c]harges by an ASP for services that allow customers
remote access to software applications via the Internet or other online connection,
sometimes referred to as cloud computing, are not taxable when the ASP retains
title to the software and does not grant a license with ownership rights to the
customer’).
As described above, COMPANY 2 does not enter into any sale, lease or license
agreements with customers that sign up for the Offering. At no time is any
software or application transferred to a customer, and the customer cannot access
the hosted software code nor manipulate the software in any way. Rather,
COMPANY 2 provides services using its own equipment and software that it
licenses. The licensed software is maintained on a hosted COMPANY 2 server
on COMPANY 2-owned equipment at a COMPANY 2 location, and the
equipment and software is at all times maintained by, and under the control of,
COMPANY 2 employees. For the same reason, the Offering does not constitute a
lease of computer equipment, as no transfer of title to the computer equipment
occurs, and the customer does not have any rights to possession or control of such
computer equipment. Thus, the Offering constitutes the provision of non-taxable
services and does not constitute a taxable lease or license of hardware or software
to customers.
In addition, the Offering does not constitute a taxable information service because
COMPANY 2 does not compile or manipulate data, or provide written reports of
compiled or manipulated data to its customers.
The Cloud Collaboration Service Offering if determined to be a transfer of
software to customers, is exempt from tax as electronically delivered pre-written
software.
Even if it is determined that the Cloud Collaboration Service Offering constitutes
a lease or other transfer of software to customers, the Offering should
nevertheless still be exempt from tax because any such transfer would occur
through electronic means, and would therefore not be considered a taxable sale of
tangible personal property. In this regard, a number of states have determined
that the electronic transfer of pre-written software is exempt from tax. For
instance, the Florida Department of Revenue has taken the position that the sale of
pre-written software delivered electronically is exempt from tax because no
transfer of tangible personal property occurs. See Florida Department of Revenue
TAA 03A-200 (April 30, 2003) and TAA 05-A-026 (June 2, 2005); see also
Florida Department of Revenue v. Quotron Systems Inc., 615 So. 2d 774 (Fla.
Dist. Ct. App. 1993) (electronic transmission of financial information to
subscriber’s video display terminals was not subject to sales or use tax;
transaction did not constitute sale or rental of tangible personal property). The

Florida Department of Revenue has also applied the electronic delivery exception
to a situation in which customers paid subscription fees for remote access to
certain business and financial software applications. See Florida Department of
Revenue TAA 10A-052 (December 3, 2010). In addition, states such as Iowa and
California provide express statutory and regulatory exemptions from their sales
tax for electronically delivered pre-written software. See, e.g., Cal Code Regs. tit.
18 § 1502(f)(1)(d) and Iowa Code § 423.3(67). In a recent policy ruling, the Iowa
Department of Revenue concluded that a ‘hosted software’ arrangement did not
constitute a taxable sale of tangible personal property, but rather was exempt as
electronically delivered software, because the software was only available for use
electronically. See Iowa Policy Letter 12300002 (January 11, 2012). Thus, even
if the Cloud Collaboration Service Offering was found to constitute a transfer of
software, it should nevertheless be exempt from tax because a transfer would
occur electronically.
The Services provided by the Cloud Collaboration Service Offering are not
taxable telecommunications services.
Certain states impose tax on telecommunications services. Such taxes are
generally imposed on the charges for the transmission of messages or
information, rather than for the content of the message or information that is
transmitted. See generally Walter Hellerstein, State Taxation, ¶ 15.10[1] (WG&L
2012). COMPANY 2 does not itself provide a customer with the ability to
transmit messages or information across any telephone, Internet or other network
lines, and thus, is not providing a taxable telecommunications service. Indeed,
COMPANY 2’s customers continue to communicate over the PSTN, and continue
to pay their telecommunications provider the same charges and taxes, both before
and after signing up for the COMPANY 2, Cloud Collaboration Service Offering.
Rather, as described above, the Offering provides a customer with the ability to
access various applications that enhance the functionality of a customer’s own
communication equipment.
While COMPANY 2 is providing services over a customer’s phone or Internet
connection, it is not COMPANY 2 that provides the ability to transmit or route
information and communicate across such lines.
The customer’s
telephone/Internet provider provides the connection line through which the
customer utilizes the software applications provided by the Offering.
Furthermore, because COMPANY 2 is not providing the transmission or routing
of messages, data or information, there are no such charges listed on the
customer’s statement of work, customer service order or invoice for the Offering.
In short, through the Offering, COMPANY 2 will be providing the described
functionality previously performed by the customer in-house, none of which was
subject to sales tax, and nothing more. COMPANY 2 will not be providing the
services that are provided to a customer by its third-party telecommunications
carrier; rather, it will merely be hosting the hardware and software historically

located at the customer site that is utilized to enhance the customer’s own
telecommunication capabilities. Indeed, as stated above, a customer’s contract
with its telecommunications carrier for telecommunications services will remain
in place and unaltered both before and after the customer signs up for the
Offering.
Thus, for the foregoing reasons, the Offering does not constitute a taxable
telecommunications service.
The Services provided by the Cloud Collaboration Service Offering are provided
in Illinois
The software-applications licensed by COMPANY 2 that are the engine of the
Cloud Collaboration Service Offering are run on COMPANY 2-owned hardware
that is located in Illinois. COMPANY 2 personnel located in Illinois provide onsite professional services to maintain the hardware and the software. Even though
the Services may be utilized by customers nationwide, the Cloud Collaboration
Service Offering are performed by COMPANY 2 wholly from the state of Illinois
(although certain remote services are provided from STATE, including remote
monitoring and troubleshooting, necessary adds, moves, changes and deletions).
Therefore, such Services should only be taxable, if at all, by Illinois. In this
regard, several states have determined that hosted software transactions should be
sourced to the location of the server on which the hosted software is stored. See,
e.g., Tennessee Department of Revenue Letter Ruling 11-58 (October 10, 2011)
(concluding that a taxpayer’s remote access of software was not subject to tax by
Tennessee when the software was located on a server outside of Tennessee); Utah
Private Letter Rulings No. 08-012 (January 21, 2009) and No. 09-003 (April 7,
2009) (prior to amendments to Utah’s sales and use tax statute, concluding that
certain transactions in which Utah customers remotely accessed software were not
taxable by Utah because the Company’s servers on which the software was
housed were not located in Utah); Kansas Private Letter Ruling No. P-2011-010
(December 27, 2011) (noting that remotely-accessed software was not subject to
tax because no software was delivered to a customer in Kansas; rather, the
software was stored on the service provider’s servers located outside of Kansas).
In this case, the hosted software is housed and operated in Illinois (with certain
remote management and troubleshooting taking place from STATE). Therefore,
the Services should be treated as provided in Illinois.

Thank you for your consideration of this request. Please do not hesitate to contact
me if you have any questions, or would like any additional information. We
respectfully request a conference in the event you tentatively conclude that an
adverse ruling would be warranted. A power of attorney authorizing the
undersigned to represent COMPANY 2 in this matter is attached as Attachment
C. This ruling request pertains only to periods beginning after June 30, 2012, and

none of COMPANY 2 or any of its affiliates operating in your state is under audit
for sales and use tax for such periods.

DEPARTMENT’S RESPONSE:
The Department’s regulation “Public Information, Rulemaking and Organization”
provides that “[w]hether to issue a private letter ruling in response to a letter ruling request is
within the discretion of the Department. The Department will respond to all requests for private
letter rulings either by issuance of a ruling or by a letter explaining that the request for ruling will
not be honored.” 2 Ill. Adm. Code 1200.110(a)(4). The Department has decided that it will not
issue a Private Letter Ruling in regards to your request and issue this General Information Letter
instead. Please note, though, this General Information Letter is limited to the issue you raised
regarding whether your client is providing services subject to the Telecommunications Excise
Tax Act.
The Illinois Telecommunications Excise Tax Act imposes a tax on the act or privilege of
originating or receiving intrastate or interstate telecommunications by persons in Illinois at the
rate of 7% of the gross charges for such telecommunications purchased at retail from retailers by
such persons. 35 ILCS 630/3 and 4. “Telecommunications,” in addition to the meaning
ordinarily and popularly ascribed to it, includes, without limitation, messages or information
transmitted through use of local, toll and wide area telephone service; private line services;
channel services; telegraph services; teletypewriter; computer exchange services; cellular mobile
telecommunications service; specialized mobile radio; stationary two way radio; paging service;
or any other form of mobile and portable one-way or two-way communications; or any other
transmission of messages or information by electronic or similar means, between or among
points by wire, cable, fiber-optics, laser, microwave, radio, satellite or similar facilities.
“Telecommunications” do not include “value added services in which computer processing
applications are used to act on the form, content, code and protocol of the information for
purposes other than transmission.” See 35 ILCS 630/2(a) and 2(c). If telecommunications
retailers provide these services, the charges for each service must be disaggregated and
separately stated from telecommunications charges in the books and records of the retailers. If
these charges are not thus disaggregated, the entire charge is taxable as a sale of
telecommunications.
“Gross charges” means the amount paid for the act or privilege of originating or receiving
telecommunications in this State and for all services and equipment provided in connection
therewith by a retailer, valued in money whether paid in money or otherwise, including cash,
credits, services and property of every kind or nature, and shall be determined without any
deduction on account of the cost of such telecommunications, the cost of materials used, labor or
service costs or any other expense whatsoever. “Gross charges” do not include “charges for the
storage of data or information for subsequent retrieval or the processing of data or information
intended to change its form or content.” See 86 Ill. Adm. Code 495.100(c).
In general, when a customer utilizes services provided by a company as described herein,
by means of the customer’s existing telecommunications, internet, or network connections, for

which the customer pays its own third-party telecommunications provider, the company would
not be providing telecommunications under the Telecommunications Excise Tax Act.
Consequently, the customer would not incur Telecommunications Excise Tax on those services.
Note, in Illinois, information or data that is electronically transferred or downloaded is
not considered the transfer of tangible personal property in this State. See 86 Ill. Adm. Code
130.2105(a)(3). However, canned computer software is considered taxable tangible personal
property regardless of the form in which it is transferred or transmitted, including tape, disc,
card, electronic means or other media. See 86 Ill. Adm. Code 130. 1935. If the computer
software consists of custom computer programs, then the sales of such software may not be
taxable retail sales. See Section 130.1935(c). Custom computer programs or software must be
prepared to the special order of the customer.
I hope this information is helpful. If you require additional information, please visit our
website at www.tax.illinois.gov or contact the Department’s Taxpayer Information Division at
(217) 782-3336.
Very truly yours,

Debra M. Boggess
Associate Council