🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
IL ST 12-0020-GIL Illinois Hotel Operators' Occupation Tax 2012-04-02

Did a hotel-room membership reseller owe Illinois Hotel Operators' Occupation Tax on its full member charge or only the hotel's discounted room price?

Short answer: IDOR did not answer whether the membership club owed tax on its $40 markup or whether the taxable amount was $100 or the hotel's $60 receipt. It explained that Hotel Operators' Occupation Tax is imposed on a person engaged in renting hotel rooms and is measured by rent received for occupancy. The hotel operator—not the room occupant—incurs the tax even if it does not collect reimbursement from the guest. Whether the club itself was a hotel operator, and the amount of its taxable rent, were left unresolved.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2012. Ezel answers yours, under current Illinois tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2012
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Illinois Department of Revenue General Information Letter (GIL), issued under 2 Ill. Adm. Code 1200.120. A GIL is NOT a statement of Department policy and is NOT binding on the Department. IDOR explained HOOT's structure but did not decide whether the room reseller was a hotel operator or whether $60, $100, or the markup was taxable. This is historical April 2012 guidance; verify current hotel-reseller, marketplace, and local hotel-tax rules. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A membership club bought hotel rooms for a discounted $60 price and charged members $100 plus tax. It asked whether hotel tax applied to $100, only the hotel's $60 receipt, or the club's $40 spread.

IDOR described the structure of the Hotel Operators' Occupation Tax without resolving that calculation. The tax applied to persons engaged in renting, leasing, or letting hotel rooms. “Rent” included consideration received for occupancy, and “occupancy” included the right to use the room, its furnishings, and accompanying services.

The hotel operator—not the occupant—incurred the tax on rental receipts. The operator could add a reimbursement charge to the guest's bill and label it hotel tax, but the charge was only reimbursement; the operator remained liable even if the guest did not reimburse it. Applicable local hotel taxes could be additional.

The response did not determine whether the membership club itself was a hotel operator or state whether the relevant taxable rent was $60, $100, or the $40 difference.

Common questions

Did IDOR say the club should tax $100? No.

Did it approve taxing only the hotel's $60 receipt? No.

Who legally incurred HOOT under the explanation? The hotel operator, not the room occupant.

Citations and references

  • 35 ILCS 145/2(1), 145/2(3), and 145/2(6)
  • 86 Ill. Adm. Code 480.101

Source

Original ruling text

ST 12-0020-GIL 04/02/2012 HOTEL OPERATORS' TAX
The Hotel Operators' Occupation Tax Act is imposed upon hotel operators engaged in the
business. Hotel operators are permitted to reimburse themselves for this tax liability by stating
such amount as an additional charge to persons renting rooms. 86 Ill. Adm. Code 480.101.
(This is a GIL.)

April 2, 2012

Dear Xxxxx:
This letter is in response to your letter that we received on January 30, 2012, in which you
request information. The Department issues two types of letter rulings. Private Letter Rulings
(“PLRs”) are issued by the Department in response to specific taxpayer inquiries concerning the
application of a tax statute or rule to a particular fact situation. A PLR is binding on the Department,
but only as to the taxpayer who is the subject of the request for ruling and only to the extent the facts
recited in the PLR are correct and complete. Persons seeking PLRs must comply with the
procedures for PLRs found in the Department’s regulations at 2 Ill. Adm. Code 1200.110. The
purpose of a General Information Letter (“GIL”) is to direct taxpayers to Department regulations or
other sources of information regarding the topic about which they have inquired. A GIL is not a
statement of Department policy and is not binding on the Department. See 2 Ill. Adm. Code
1200.120. You may access our website at www.tax.illinois.gov to review regulations, letter rulings
and other types of information relevant to your inquiry.
The nature of your inquiry and the information you have provided require that we respond with
a GIL. In your letter you have stated and made inquiry as follows:
We represent a client who resells hotel rooms in CITY to its members. They have
engaged us to determine if they are obligated to collect and remit sales and hotel taxes
on the rent that they receive from their members.
Members pay a membership fee to join our client’s club. Once they are a member, they
have access to hotel rooms around the world at discounted rates. Our client purchases
rooms from hotels at a discounted rate.
Is our client obligated to collect and remit sales and lodging taxes on the full amount of
rent received from the renter, or just on the discounted price that they remit to the hotel?
Below is an example of a typical transaction:

A member rents a hotel room via our client for $100 plus tax

Our client collects the $100 plus tax from the renter/member

Our client remits $60 plus tax for the room to the hotel
Should our client charge sales and lodging taxes on the $100 or the $60?
The hotel will remit tax on the $60, so should our client remit tax on the $40, or is the
$40 considered a commission and not taxable?

Please feel free to call me with any questions.

DEPARTMENT’S RESPONSE:
The Hotel Operators' Occupation Tax Act (“HOOT”) imposes a tax upon persons engaged in
the business of renting, leasing or letting rooms in a hotel, as defined in the Act. HOOT defines “hotel”
to include any building or buildings in which the public may, for consideration, obtain living quarters,
sleeping or housekeeping accommodations. See 35 ILCS 145/2(1). See also 86 Ill. Adm. Code
480.101, which explains the nature, rate and scope of HOOT. This tax may be in addition to any local
hotel taxes that may be applicable.
HOOT defines “rent” as “the consideration received for occupancy, valued in money, whether
received in money or otherwise, including all receipts, cash, credits and property or services of any
kind or nature.” See 35 ILCS 145/2(6). The definition of “rent” must be read in conjunction with the
term “occupancy.” HOOT defines “occupancy” as “the use or possession, or the right to the use or
possession, of any room or rooms in a hotel for any purpose, or the right to the use or possession of
the furnishings or to the services and accommodations accompanying the use and possession of the
room or rooms.” See 35 ILCS 145/2(3).
As noted above, HOOT is a tax upon persons engaged in the business of renting, leasing or
letting rooms in a hotel (i.e., a hotel operator). There is no corresponding tax imposed upon hotel
room occupants. Rather, a hotel operator may reimburse himself for his HOOT liability by collecting a
corresponding reimbursement charge from a room occupant. Although a hotel operator may state the
reimbursement charge as "hotel tax" on his bill, it is nothing more than a reimbursement charge.
Given the structure of the tax, the hotel operator will incur HOOT liability on the rental receipts even
when he is not reimbursed by the room occupant.
I hope this information is helpful. If you require additional information, please visit our website
at www.tax.illinois.gov or contact the Department’s Taxpayer Information Division at (217) 782-3336.
Very truly yours,

Debra M. Boggess
Associate Counsel
DMB:msk

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2012 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Illinois tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.