🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
IL IT 11-0012-GIL Illinois Income Tax 2011-07-07

Did a donee include the donor's holding period when calculating Illinois's subtraction for pre-August 1969 appreciation?

Short answer: Yes, provided federal law included the donor's holding period in the donee's holding period. Illinois Section 203(f) used a holding-period fraction when the property's August 1, 1969 value was not readily ascertainable. Because the Illinois Act did not define holding period, Section 102 adopted the comparable federal meaning. The gifted farmland's eligible period therefore included the grandfather's pre-gift ownership for the valuation-limitation calculation.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2011. Ezel answers yours, under current Illinois tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2011
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official 2011 Illinois Department of Revenue General Information Letter applying federal holding-period principles to Illinois's valuation-limitation subtraction for gifted property. A GIL is NOT a statement of Department policy and is NOT binding on the Department. Gift validity, federal carryover basis and holding period, August 1, 1969 value, gain character, ownership records, tax year, and current Illinois law can change the calculation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The donee could count the donor's holding period if federal law did. Illinois's valuation limitation removed qualifying appreciation attributable to periods before August 1, 1969.

When the property's value on that date was not readily ascertainable, Section 203(f) used the months before August 1969 over the entire holding period. Illinois did not separately define holding period, so Section 102 imported the federal meaning.

Because federal gift rules could tack the grandfather's ownership onto the recipient's period, the same combined period applied to the Illinois fraction.

What this means for you

Preserve donor acquisition, gift, basis, and ownership records. The subtraction depends on the federal holding period and the Illinois valuation method for the property.

Common questions

Q: Did the period start only when the taxpayer received the gift?
A: No, if federal law tacked the donor's period.

Q: Was the conclusion unconditional?
A: No. It depended on the federal holding-period result.

Citations and references

  • 35 ILCS 5/203(a)(2)(G), 203(f)
  • 35 ILCS 5/102

Subject

Subtraction Modifications – Valuation Limitation

Source

Original ruling text

IT 11-0012-GIL 07/07/2011 SUBTRACTION MODIFICATIONS – VALUATION LIMITATION
General Information Letter: A donee’s holding period of property acquired by gift
includes the holding period of the donor prior to time the gift was made.
July 7, 2011
Dear:
This is in response to your letter dated June 9, 2011 in which you request information related to the
Illinois income tax. The nature of your letter and the information provided require that we respond
with a General Information Letter (GIL). A GIL is designed to provide general information, is not a
statement of Department policy and is not binding on the Department. See 86 Ill. Adm. Code
1200.120(b) and (c), which may be accessed from the Department’s web site at www.ILtax.com.
Your letter states as follows:
We recently contacted the Illinois Department of Revenue through the toll-free help line with a
question regarding gains from sales or exchanges of property acquired before August 1, 1969.
The individual providing assistance and his supervisor had differing opinions about the
treatment in our situation and suggested that we contact the Office of the General Council for
guidance.
The instructions for Schedule F state that the amount of appreciation that is attributable to
property acquired before August 1, 1969 is not subject to Illinois income tax when the property
is sold. For properties whose fair market value was not readily ascertainable on August 1,
1969, the non-taxable portion of the gain which is attributable to appreciation before August 1,
1969 is calculated by multiplying the federally calculated gain by a fraction, whose numerator
is the number of months you held the property before August 1, 1969 and whose denominator
is the total number of months you held the property.
The taxpayer in question was an Illinois resident in 2009 and sold property (farmland in Illinois)
which was “gifted” to her by her grandfather in 1978. The property was originally acquired by
her grandfather in 1929. In calculating the holding period and gain or loss on the sale of the
property, we followed the guidelines in IRS Publications 544 and 551. These Publications tell
us that in the case of property received as a gift, the taxpayer’s basis in the property is the
same as the donor’s adjusted basis (this property was sold at a gain) and the holding period
includes the donor’s holding period. Applying these rules, the taxpayer’s holding period of this
property was from 1939 until 2009.
Our question now is whether the donor’s holding period is taken into consideration when
determining the number of months that the taxpayer held the property for purposes of
completing Illinois Schedule F. Does the taxpayer’s holding period only include the number of
months that she held the property, or does her holding period include her grandfather’s holding
period?
RULING
Section 203(a)(2)(G) of the Illinois Income Tax Act (“IITA”; 35 ILCS 5/203(a)(2)(G)) provides a
subtraction modification equal to the valuation limitation amount. IITA Section 203(f) defines the term
“valuation limitation amount” as follows:

IT 11-0012-GIL
July 7, 2011
Page 2
(1) In general. The valuation limitation amount … is an amount equal to:
(A) The sum of the pre-August 1, 1969 appreciation amounts (to the extent consisting of
gain reportable under the provisions of Section 1245 or 1250 of the Internal Revenue
Code) for all property in respect of which such gain was reported for the taxable year;
plus
(B) The lesser of (i) the sum of the pre-August 1, 1969 appreciation amounts (to the extent
consisting of capital gain) for all property in respect of which such gain was reported for
federal income tax purposes for the taxable year, or (ii) the net capital gain for the
taxable year, reduced in either case by any amount of such gain included in the amount
determined under subsection (a)(2)(F) or (c)(2)(H).
(2) Pre-August 1, 1969 appreciation amount.
(A) If the fair market value of property referred to in paragraph (1) was readily ascertainable
on August 1, 1969, the pre-August 1, 1969 appreciation amount for such property is the
lesser of (i) the excess of such fair market value over the taxpayer’s basis (for
determining gain) for such property on that date (determined under the Internal
Revenue Code as in effect on that date), or (ii) the total gain realized and reportable for
federal income tax purposes in respect of the sale, exchange or other disposition of
such property.
(B) If the fair market value of property referred to in paragraph (1) was not readily
ascertainable on August 1, 1969, the pre-August 1, 1969 appreciation amount for such
property is that amount which bears the same ratio to the total gain reported in respect
of the property for federal income tax purposes for the taxable year, as the number of
full calendar months in that part of the taxpayer’s holding period for the property ending
July 31, 1969 bears to the number of full calendar months in the taxpayer’s entire
holding period for the property.
(C) The Department shall prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the
purposes of this paragraph.
Although Section 203(f) does not define the term “holding period,” IITA Section 102 states:
Except as otherwise expressly provided or clearly appearing from the context, any term used
in this Act shall have the same meaning as when used in a comparable context in the United
States Internal Revenue Code of 1954 or any successor law or laws relating to federal income
taxes and other provisions of the statutes of the United States relating to federal income taxes
as such Code, laws and statutes are in effect for the taxable year.
Applying the above provision in Letter Ruling 96-0002 (January 5, 1996), the Department observed
that the IITA follows the federal rules for determining “holding period” for purposes of the valuation
limitation amount under IITA Section 203(f). In the ruling, the Department determined that a taxpayer
who acquired property by gift in 1973 qualified for the valuation limitation subtraction because under
federal income tax law the taxpayer’s holding period included the donor’s holding period commencing
in 1952.
Accordingly, provided that for federal income tax purposes the holding period of the taxpayer(s)
includes the grandfather’s holding period, the same is true for purposes of the valuation limitation
subtraction under IITA Sections 203(a)(2)(G) and 203(f).

IT 11-0012-GIL
July 7, 2011
Page 3

As stated above, this is a GIL. A GIL does not constitute a statement of policy that applies, interprets
or prescribes the tax laws, and it is not binding on the Department. If you have further questions
regarding this GIL, please call (217) 782-7055. If you have additional questions regarding Illinois
income tax laws, please visit the Department’s website at www.ILtax.com.

Sincerely,

Brian L. Stocker
Associate Counsel (Income Tax)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2011 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Illinois tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.